X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Materials Horizons

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[Materials Horizons]Hello, you are Visitor Number 51528 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleMaterials Horizons
Journal Title AbbreviationsMATER HORIZ
ISSN2051-6347
E-ISSN2051-6355
h-index52
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
18.004.7982.365
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Materials Science
Q115 / 460
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Process Chemistry and Technology
Q12 / 58
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Mechanics of Materials
Q17 / 367
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Q110 / 670

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)2.90%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/mh#!recentarticles&adv
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/materhoriz
Open AccessNo
Publisher
Subject AreaCHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication Frequency
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume193
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2051-6347%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors:
Competitiveness *Data from Authors:
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Materials Horizons】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on Materials Horizons: Write a review
Author: penguin


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-12-22 14:58:02
By December 22, 2019, real-time impact factor: materials horizons=11.63, advanced science=14.82 energy storage materials=15.86, ACS energy letters=17.64, AEM=23.51, materials today energy=5.43, nano research=7.81, CC=5.73, Chemical Science=8.88, ACS central science=11.69, JACS=13.7, nanoscale=6.13, JEC=6.8, JMCA=10.8, CEJ=10.44, EA=6.05, AMI=8.41, JPS=7.9.

(8) Thank | penguin

Author: 小白白不白


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-20 15:11:46
A flagship publication of RSC in materials field. Two manuscripts were submitted and one has been accepted for publication. The status from submission turns to with editor usually takes less than one week. External review is about 20 days. I resubmitted the paper after major revision, and it was then sent for review. 10 days later, the comments returned requiring a minor revision. I resubmitted it after revision again, and it was accepted in two days. Another one was rejected because there was too much content, which didn’t meet the requirements of the communication format. So it was suggested to reject after sent for review.

(3) Thank | 小白白不白

Author: 小白白不白


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-20 15:08:47
A flagship publication of RSC in materials field. Two manuscripts were submitted and one has been accepted for publication. The status from submission turns to with editor usually takes less than one week. External review is about 20 days. I resubmitted the paper after major revision, and it was then sent for review. 10 days later, the comments returned requiring a minor revision. I resubmitted it after revision again, and it was accepted in two days. Another one was rejected because there was too much content, which didn’t meet the requirements of the communication format. So it was suggested to reject after sent for review.

(2) Thank | 小白白不白

Author: 璐璐


Subject Area: Multidisciplinary
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-21 18:44:28
6 days after submission, the status became with editor at 4:30 pm, and the paper was rejected at 7:00 pm. The editor said that the experiments showed novelty, but the depth of the concept was not sufficient. I think the editor only read the Conceptual Insights statement. I did not see how the Conceptual Insights statement is defined in the format guidelines. It’s a pity that it was rejected. Later on when I thought about it, I think my research is novel concept-wise. I hope people who submit in the future would pay attention to the Conceptual Insights statement. “I do not feel that it represents work of exceptional scientific significance that demonstrates a ground-breaking new conceptual insights into the topic as is required for Communications in Materials Horizons, and it thus does not have the exceptionally high impact required to appeal to our readership.”

(8) Thank | 璐璐

Author: 小白白不白


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-20 15:11:46
be the flagship publication of RSC's material field.Two articles have been submitted, and one has been accepted for publication.Submission to the editor within a week.The external audit cycle is about 20 days.Submitted after major revised, and sent to the external audit for 10 days, the opinion is minor repair, submitted again after revise, received two days later.In addition, after the submission of the external review, because the content is too much to meet the format requirements of the communication, it is recommended that reject
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 小白白不白

Author: 小白白不白


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-20 15:08:47
The flagship journal in the field of materials for RSC.Two articles have been submitted, and one has been accepted for publication.Submission to the editor within a week.The external audit cycle is about 20 days.Submitted after major revised, and sent to the external audit for 10 days, the opinion is minor repair, submitted again after revise, received two days later.In addition, after submitting the external review, because the content is too much to meet the format requirements of communication, it is recommended that reject
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 小白白不白

Author: a5010574@126.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-22 09:33:58
2018, January 25, contribution, the middle of the new year, the reviewer changed a batch of a batchOn February 8, 2018, I finally found a reviewer. I may have changed several reviewers because of the New Year’s reasons.March 12, 2018 Received three reviewers' opinions. One suggestion accepts a proposal to change to a lower grade journal. The third arbitration proposes to accept the editor.March 15th, 2018, returning to the revised draft, mainly small problems, no big problem.March 22, 2018, today I finally received the message of acceptance.Provide information for your reference
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | a5010574@126.com

Author: shalanzui


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-10 09:21:18
The review is very strict, one and a half months after the initial review, one overhaul, and two minor repairs are accepted.The editor is also very cautious about the data format and TOC, and requires minor modifications to be accepted!Finally, I gave cover invitation,
Show Review in Original Language
(34) Thank | shalanzui

Author: 29964095@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-09 16:26:05
The article was received on 07 Jul2017, accepted on 07 Aug 2017 and first published on 07 Aug 2017
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 29964095@qq.com

Author: PEDOT_in_a_MOF


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-30 05:35:44
is mostly review and communication (letter).Communication requires a novel concept and may have some influence in related fields.In addition to the abstract, you need to write a "Conceptual insights" to illustrate the conceptual innovation and potential of the work.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | PEDOT_in_a_MOF

Author: dr10292000@yahoo.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-14 05:57:12
New journal, requires higher positioning according to AM, less number of reviews, influence factor will increase
Show Review in Original Language
(22) Thank | dr10292000@yahoo.com

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [Materials Horizons]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service