Frontiers in Plant Science

Publish fast journals, suitable for students who urgently need to graduate, but the layout fee is expensive

(0) Thank | chf

The article has been selectd "Frongtier in Plant Science", edit status display: Edited by: No Associate Editor assigned.Some people say that his article will display the editor's name directly after the select. What should I do with this situation?

(5) Thank | liaoyongxiang123@163.com

The journal was reviewed very quickly, but the articles included were varied.Some physiological articles are watering, and the same routines as PO and SR.Some research institutes have ruled out the assessment, and applying for funds is also a negative impact.

(10) Thank | foxdd

Layout fee thank you

(1) Thank | 456

A total of three reviewers were found. Two reviewers agreed to receive it one month ago. The other reviewers have not responded for more than 40 days. Slow

(0) Thank | 风中的蝴蝶

The editorial department is very efficient. The review was submitted for more than one month, and the revision was given to 35 days. The two reviewers did not request additional experiments, but only required to explain some experimental results.The opinions put forward are very pertinent. It may be that the first time the writing is too bad, and it will be accepted within one week after the modification.

(1) Thank | zhongchu2011@126.com

This journalIt is recommended not to select, the review time is long, and one of the reviewers, I spent a lot of energy and time to supplement the experiment he asked, answer all the questions, but an experiment did not make up, explain the reason to him, hope toExtension of time.As a result, he directly quit.This is too sad. In order to make up the experiment, I spent tens of thousands of dollars. Even the Spring Festival was not too good. So I quit directly, and the journal invited the third reviewer.This is not harmful to me!

(14) Thank | quhaiyong@126.com

This journal's impact factor is rising very fast, I hope that the editor can continue to improve the quality of the article, so that the impact factor continues to climb, rising to more than five.加油

(6) Thank | 542951928

I feel very confident. There are already two articles on it, and they are all accepted after the revision.The review comments were very pertinent, there was no suspicion, and no experiment was required.Finally, the editor and reviewer names are published, which may serve as an author.However, looking at other related papers, the level difference is large, and the estimated impact factor will fall.

(5) Thank | j316wenmingwang@163.com

After receiving a week, I received an editor to send an email to another section, taking it for granted.By default, after two months, the editor once again asked for confirmation to go to another section, only to know that his intention caused the article to drag for 2 months, and promptly replied to the editor’s consent, and then sent it out for external review.I came back in a month, one reviewer asked for language retouching, the other asked several pages of questions, one by one, and went back and forth to modify the five drafts. Accepted, editors and reviewers' opinions were very pertinent, from reviewingIt was accepted in the end, it took 2 months, I lost 2 months, and I published it online for 4 months!

(2) Thank | wujianzhong176@163.com

The impact factor is worrying. I don’t know if I can still keep the four points next year. Now the immediate impact factor is less than three points. 唉

(1) Thank | 123

The impact factor is worrying.I don't know if I can still keep the four points next year. Now the immediate impact factor is less than three points. 唉

(1) Thank | 123

was converted to TAGS three times before, the editing efficiency is very very low, one time is shared for one year, the result is rejected, it is finally edited by the editor, and the reviewers have noThe problem, and later checked the editor found that this person is very abnormal, there is no high-level article, but it can be used as Editor.Later, it was unfortunate to switch to this journal. The reviewer gave a good review and reasonable opinion. Immediately after the response, the editor responded to provisional accepted, and then received it one week later.It is estimated that the Frontiers in plant science impact factor will also climb. Although the publication cost is expensive, it is very important to select reviewers and editors.The editor is responsible, and the proofreading edited at the end of the article is very careful and very certified.

(0) Thank | tsu2@ualerbta.ca

This journal,When the comment is activated, it usually gives the reviewer how long it takes to reply. A reviewer has completely disappeared.

(0) Thank | 123

has been submitted for more than four months. At the second trial, one reviewer quits the review, and one reviewer accepts it. Nearly two months later, the editor did not find the third reviewer.Late can not give the final result.This time can't afford it...

(4) Thank | 123

I have been more than a month, or submitted state @879358970@qq.com

(0) Thank | qq

9月3# selectd, is still submitted, how slow, ah,

(0) Thank | 879358970@qq.com

You usually have a few days to submit a review, I have submitted a week, and have not submitted for review.

(1) Thank | 499981806@qq.com

4.4Submission, 5.8 returns the opinion, and it is revised for 25 days. Now I am going to submit the revised draft. The submission system will not be used. Which god can give pointers, why can’tIs it necessary to submit a revised article before the reviewer agrees to my changes before submitting it?In addition, is it necessary to answer every question, or just answer the questions raised by the reviewer?You are pending to respond to Reviewer 2 and/or resubmit a new version of your manuscript.Reviewer 1 is/are pending to respond in the discussion forum. What does it mean, my response has been submitted successfully?

(3) Thank | hyj1009@163.com

is temporarily accepted, do not know what state this is, how long it will take, hope to have a good result

(0) Thank | 499981806@qq.com

My article was submitted at the end of January 2015, and the first trial was completed at the end of March, and the experiment was repaired within one month.The reviewer made the revision, and the revised draft was returned within one week. It was a minor repair. After the minor repair returned, it waited for 2 months. During the period, one reviewer agreed to accept, and another reviewer estimated the vacation...Silent.Two months later, at the end of July, the reviewer asked Xiao Xiu, who returned to the reviewer one week later to support the recruitment, and waited a few days until the beginning of August to edit the offer.I just want to say that this open journal is not as quick and easy to receive as everyone thinks.The journal has high requirements, and the reviewers have changed very carefully and the level is good.If you want to review the manuscript, you have to look at what kind of reviewer

(5) Thank | zly19860823zly@126.com

has been submitted for more than 10 days, has not been reviewed, what is the situation, not to say that the editing process is fast, wait for death

(1) Thank | jane

The review is quick, the review process is open and transparent, and the reviewer's information is finally published.Recommended!

(5) Thank | 水玉

review articles, review is quick, no problem is some smallCorrection of the language error.

(3) Thank | ln6488@gmail.com