Frontiers in Microbiology

is very fast, I feel that this journal is very good.Everyone thinks that the article can be tried almost

(0) Thank | sanyah@126.com

very fast, I feel this journal is very goodEveryone thinks that the article is almost the same.

(0) Thank | sanyah@126.com

There are results in two months, after the overhaul, you can try

(1) Thank | 行走的侠客

Submission for half a month, e did not invite the editor, is it awkward, can you send an email to ask ah

(0) Thank | 知了

10 monthly submission, 20 days to be assigned to the editor, 1 month to find the reviewer, now two months, no news, the end of the year summary, the boss forced tight...Listening to a journal recommended by a teacher, she received it in the week she told me, so the difference is so big..I hope that there will be good news before the end of the year

(2) Thank | 1650345438@qq.com

04 Aug 2017Article accepted for publication.31 May 2017Interactive review forum activated.28 Apr 2017Corresponding Author submitted manuscript.

(0) Thank | longxiang8802@163.com

The scope of reception is very wide. The key issue is that the manuscripts received in these two years have increased substantially, with an average of 20-30 articles per day. There are still many irrigations in it.Will be poured like plos one

(7) Thank | Seaweed

contributed a week to invite the editor, and then another week, I haven't found a reviewer yet...

(1) Thank | 寻那温柔的暮色

has been submitted for ten days, and has not invited editor

(0) Thank | ljb05243@163.com

I feel that a lot of articles are in the water, everyone is careful, I have seen a lot of this field.Within the article, the impact factor is a bit illusory.

(4) Thank | 668

Is there a reply letter from each author after submitting this journal?

(0) Thank | sunflower

selectd for half a month has not been with editor relatively slow

(1) Thank | Anonymous

15 In the middle of the year, the opinions of the two editors were very pertinent, and the article accepted within 3 months.So in October 15th, I selectd again, the process was rather rough, but it was not the quality of my article. It was some drag on the performance of the editorial department. I said that I didn’t find the reviewer twice. The article was not accepted until April of the 16th.In the past six months, my research results have not been the latest.But in the middle of it, the journal is still very strong.

(1) Thank | huisheng113905@163.com

is generally high.However, after the manuscript is modified, it will communicate with the reviewer by means of online interaction, that is, reply to the reviewer's comments on the review website of the journal. If the reviewer has an unclear or dissatisfied place, he will express his opinion and know the answer.Satisfied.The reviewer's information is published after the article is acceptd.

(2) Thank | wuweihui@yahoo.com