X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

AIP Advances

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[AIP Advances]Hello, you are Visitor Number 112951 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleAIP Advances
Journal Title AbbreviationsAIP ADV
ISSN2158-3226
h-index44
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
2.600.4450.669
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: General Physics and Astronomy
Q294 / 224

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)6.50%
Official Websitehttp://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/adva
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://aipadvances.peerx-press.org/cgi-bin/main.plex
Open AccessYes
Publisher
Subject AreaNANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication Frequency
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume1445
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2158-3226%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: Fast, 2-4 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【AIP Advances】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on AIP Advances: Write a review
Author: xpznb


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-01 10:50:10
Here is my struggle to publish this paper. I study electronic devices, and I have a paper submitted to APL, EDL, JAP, all rejected. At each journal, the review took  more than a month, two months at JAP. Each time there were two reviewers, who disagreed; Plus the time I spent on revising the paper and adding new experiments, it took a total of more than 9 months. Only someone who has such experience would know how hard it was. Eventually, the JAP editor suggested me to transfer it to AIP Advances. After the transfer, the AIP Advances editor found another reviewer. It took only one week for the review, and a total of only 12 days before the decision was made: accept as is. The efficiency is truly high. Although this journal is Q3, and publication is not free, I am satisfied with it because it is so fast. Finally, I strongly recommend people who want to publish soon should consider submitting here if the publication fee is not an issue. The speed is really fast (but may be because my paper was transferred there).

(2) Thank | xpznb

Author: plasmatreat


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-01 23:39:21
aip advances overall speedIt's still very fast, but it will take some time for the reviewer to find it.There are certain requirements for innovation and importance, and the overall feeling is moderately difficult.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | plasmatreat

Author: 海上明月


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-01 12:42:55
Submitted in early September, APL was reviewed, two reviewers: one minor repair, one rejected the manuscript did not give specific amendments, said that it is not suitable for the journal, the editor said can be transferred to AIP AdvancesPublished after minor repairs.After the article was transferred, AIP Advances found a new reviewer, and the new reviewer gave a minor review after reviewing the manuscript. After reviewing the manuscript, he asked for a touch of English.The English was revised at the end of October and accepted two days after the manuscript.The overall feeling of AIP Advances is also a certain depth and novelty requirements, the review period is two months, AIP journals still have a certain quality, before the APL, I feel that some reviewers have higher requirements for manuscripts.It is the same as APL's review rigor. Before a friend submitted a review, it was rejected. It is not a kind of journal that can be submited. I hope that AIP can improve the quality of this journal to a new level..
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 海上明月

Author: 112


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-20 14:37:30
Refunded once, 63 days, these two days waiting for the editor to decide Associate Editor Decision Started
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 112

Author: 等着毕业的娃


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-18 23:25:50
This time, submiting in AIP is really a rough energy:1) Editor rejection: representation, approval;2) Looking for a reviewer: I have been looking for more than a month, but I have not found it. In the end, I came to four, breaking the tradition of a reviewer.3) Minor repair: Ask for the experiment, decisively reply to his length is not enough, follow-up articles will be in-depth study.4) Recruitment: Directly acceptd after ten days of minor repairs.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 等着毕业的娃

Author: 不收收费期刊


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-30 06:12:20
I saw the words "open access journal focused on rapid publication of original" and decided not to switch here. Let's take a look at everyone's opinions.At this point, you should rely almost entirely on earning Chinese money.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 不收收费期刊

Author: liangshao9564@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-24 10:36:32
just submitted out today, still do not know the result
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | liangshao9564@163.com

Author: 烟雨蓝晨


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-22 15:47:58
spent 30 days from submission to returning the revised manuscript, gave a minor repair, and changed it in 5 days. The previous period was stagnant for half a month in the editor's hand, which may be the reviewer's comparison.It's hard to find, but the overall speed is still very fast, I hope the journals will be better and better.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 烟雨蓝晨

Author: 真话


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-17 22:40:13
The point is like, the review speed is very fast.After submitting the manuscript, it took about a month to securing reviewers, but the reviewer was given a revised opinion in the next few days.There was only one reviewer, but the review was very careful. Many of the identifier errors and grammatical errors in the article were raised. I didn't realize it before.I gave it two weeks to modify the time and returned it directly after receiving the revised draft.I feel that the editor is very dedicated. The impact factor is not so high now, but I think it is a good journal. This is the first SCI of my doctor's direction. I am very grateful to AIP Advances.I hope that this journal will be better and better!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 真话

Author: liuyi


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-12 10:37:04
JAP review submitted a month later, JAP two reviewers agreed to receive, one did not agree to receive, tragedy ... modified a month later changed to Aip Advances, one month plus seven or eight daysReceived a minor repair, changed back one day, received one week later.Generally speaking, the quality of the article above is OK, the reviewer is not so watery, and will not give the review comments, but the review speed is not as fast as imagined
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | liuyi

Author: 凉凉


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-06 02:33:51
rejected in the first trial, transferred to the journal of materials science directly acceptd
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 凉凉

Author: 凉凉


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-06 02:33:48
rejected in the first trial, transferred to the journal of materials science directly acceptd
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 凉凉

Author: jxsddsxx


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-14 12:43:52
Manuscript Returned to Author for Corrections 03-Oct-2017 13:15:28Manuscript Ready for Production 03-Oct-2017 13:13:19Decision Sent to Author 03-Oct-2017 13:13:19Submission Check by Journal Office Started 02-Oct-2017 20:01:56Going to Physics of Plasmas and then Transfer to AIP Advances, the next day was acceptd, and the page fee was quite high.I thought that I could spend money, but I found out later. I selectd for two more articles. I was rejected. The impact factor of 1.5 was quite good. I introduced it to many younger brothers and sisters. Only one person was acceptd.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | jxsddsxx

Author: 啦啦


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-23 08:21:22
off the four districts and heartbreak according to the Chinese Academy of Sciences this year's beta database rsc advances four districts aip advances four districts energies four districts sr three districts speechless
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 啦啦

Author: 加菲归来


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-10 22:31:55
APL, which just started to select, did not submit for review. The editor suggested to select for AIP Advances and directly transferred to AIP Advances.The first-instance reviewer spent a month, completed the review in one week, received the first-instance opinion in 45 days, overhauled, only one reviewer, and raised 10 questions. In general, the question was more professional, not imagined.So water.Changed the re-submitment within two weeks, received the second-instance news in 10 days, and raised a question, minor repair.Revisited in two weeks, the editor received directly.It took about two months from the time of shooting to receiving, and the efficiency was relatively high.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 加菲归来

Author: 加菲归来


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-10 22:31:31
APL, which just started to select, did not submit for review. The editor suggested to select for AIP Advances and directly transferred to AIP Advances.The first-instance reviewer spent a month, completed the review in one week, received the first-instance opinion in 45 days, overhauled, only one reviewer, and raised 10 questions. In general, the question was more professional, not imagined.So water.Changed the re-submitment within two weeks, received the second-instance news in 10 days, and raised a question, minor repair.Revisited in two weeks, the editor received directly.It took about two months from the time of shooting to receiving, and the efficiency was relatively high.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 加菲归来

Author: 加菲归来


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-10 22:31:30
APL, which just started to select, did not submit for review. The editor suggested to select for AIP Advances and directly transferred to AIP Advances.The first-instance reviewer spent a month, completed the review in one week, received the first-instance opinion in 45 days, overhauled, only one reviewer, and raised 10 questions. In general, the question was more professional, not imagined.So water.Changed the re-submitment within two weeks, received the second-instance news in 10 days, and raised a question, minor repair.Revisited in two weeks, the editor received directly.It took about two months from the time of shooting to receiving, and the efficiency was relatively high.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 加菲归来

Author: 895365716@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-02 11:30:34
APL has not been submitted for review, so it has been transferred to AIP advance. It has been half a month, and the status has been assigned to the academic editor. Is there any such situation?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 895365716@qq.com

Author: xww


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-22 22:14:43
the Creative Commons license for 4 months.Help
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | xww

Author: lanksandy@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-02 10:05:10
The overall speed is very fast, the editing process is very timely, and domesticThe time difference is more than 10 hours, but it can be processed in time, and thanks to the academic editors, I often process my manuscript in the middle of the night.Submitted on August 15th, because the reviewer is not easy to find (this can be seen that the journal is biased towards the processing of physics and related materials), the trial time is a little longer, and it is revisited on September 23, which may lead to the eleventh festival., on October 25th, the result was processed and received!What needs special attention here is that this journal needs to be typeset and proofreaded by itself. There is no strict process of proofing!11.1online!Thank you, academic editor, thank you AIP adv for the hard work!
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | lanksandy@163.com

Author: 着急毕业的人


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-22 12:55:40
Many of the articles that were rejected from APL here are still available in the 3rd and 4th districts, although there are also hydrology.Because the APL has been carefully revised according to the reviewer's comments, there is not much change in the change of submitment here, and efficiency is also ok.The reviewer at the APL second trial said that you answered the reviewer's opinion very well, but the physical mechanism description was not enough..Not suitable for APL.Forget it, there are good articles, there are also garbage, but it is important to graduate early.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 着急毕业的人

Author: 非线性物理


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-13 06:55:56
The above article is generally level. There is nothing too valuable. It belongs to a barely medium-sized journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 非线性物理

Author: lipy


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-02-11 12:33:57
I selectd for APL, was rejected by the editor and recommended to select for AIP Advances. I reviewed the manuscript in less than a month, made a small revision, and then acceptd it, but the layout fee is really expensive, plusThe exchange rate is long, and it is six or seven hundred yuan more than last month.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | lipy

Author: YANAN


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-02-04 16:51:48
The engineering department can do the physics papers later, there is no way to select for non-state journals, the price is high and scary, take a look at the evaluation of OA journals, scare a sweatFortunately, the journal did not have the same tens of thousands of years as some journals, and hoped that she would abide by the bottom line of research. After all, I spent my own money and sent me a good paper I felt like.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | YANAN

Author: luren


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-01-12 00:18:19
Recommended to change here, the editing speed is super fast, the reviewer's speed is also fast, less than 1 week, the decision really took 2 weeks, very good!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | luren

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [AIP Advances]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service