Food & Function

I feel the review process is fast. Some people say that the review time is long, may be because their papers are on different topics than mine. The initial review is took one month, and the decision was major revision, no deadline. However, I felt I shouldn’t wait too long to resubmit, so I set a timeframe of 45 days for myself. However, something happened and I felt I wouldn’t be able to finish on time so I wrote to the editor. The editor quickly responded. Eventually I used months to revise the paper. The editor was very nice, replied soon, and accepted the paper about one month after my re-submission. Very efficient, I think.

(1) Thank | 小面鱼

Fancy the reputation of RSC, submitted it for 4 days and have not submitted it for review. Expect good results.

(0) Thank | 我是31235

Junk Journal!!!In October last year, the first trial took more than six months to overhaul. The problem was not a lot. It was also seriously revised. After the repair, I continued to wait. After 4 months, I was rejected. I did not explain why.

(0) Thank | 23145736@qq.com

The submission speed is slower than JAFC.The article is not too strong.

(0) Thank | han

Submitting the review speed is slower than JAFC.The article is not too innovative.

(0) Thank | han

Check the weight before submiting?

(3) Thank | 来了

submitted in February, acceptd in May, the interim trial time is relatively long, the editor is super nice, and it is so patience to encounter such procrastination as me.I am very grateful. The external review opinion is very pertinent. It is directly accepted after the revision of the opinion. It is the animal experiment that requires ethical certification. This part is only reissued after the notification is received, but it is best to write it when submitting the manuscript.

(2) Thank | sunyifan529@163.com

3月31SubmissionApril 6th external auditReturn opinion on May 9th, minor repairRevised on May 16Accepted on May 21Overall, it is still very fast, and the opinions are very fair.

(3) Thank | 爱科研的小萝卜

Seeing the reputation of RSC, the submission was really not disappointing.Innovative requirements, strong experimental design, editorial and reviewers are very professional, and very small questions are pointed out.The review status changes quickly. Each time the revision is made, the editor will send it to the reviewer for re-examination. It is a journal that is flourishing and expects a new breakthrough in the impact factor.

(2) Thank | 彦北

Submitted on January 21, overhauled on March 5, rehabilitated on March 20, accepted on April 18.The reviewers are friendly and the questions they ask are not difficult to answer.Overall it is better.Hope it could help everyone!!!

(4) Thank | 花逝

I would like to ask if this journal is a district of the Academy of Sciences.

(3) Thank | 花逝

7月3日,Submission 8.19 Received feedback for repair; 9.5 days for submission; 9.8 days for about 2 months before and after acceptance!

(2) Thank | Anonymous

was invited as a reviewer and there is no deadline for reviewing!19天审会

(2) Thank | Anonymous

The quality of the article is not bad, but the impactThe factor is not high, only the first estimate is to compare with ACS's jafc. If you select for this journal, don't worry about IF. After all, RSC's reputation is there

(2) Thank | Anonymous