Food & Function

The research is on the health effects of food and its influence on the digestion of fats. I’m considering whether to submit it to this journal or Food and Function. It feels that IF of Journal of Functional Foods has been declining.

(1) Thank | Tianlynn

19.12.4, checking submission and files; 19.12.6, with editor; 19.12.23, in peer review; 19.2.9, major revision; 19.2.20, revision submitted; 19.3.10, accept. The review speed was average. There were 2 reviewers. The questions were all basically related to the organization of the article. One reviewer requested to supplement one datum. There was no kit with high specificity, and it happened to catch up with the COVID-19. After explaining the reason, the revision was submitted. Thanks to the reviewers who didn't make trouble for me.

(4) Thank | 若此朝阳

My research direction was the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases by nutritional active ingredients. The research was based on animal experiments. The amount of data was quite large. At that time, in order to catch graduation in December, I submitted it to this journal for guarantee. If it weren't for graduation in a hurry, looking back, a manuscript with so much data can be submitted to a journal with IF over 5. The in vitro experiment part and the experimental data of the population was published in MNFR. This animal experiment part was published separately. The manuscript was submitted on July 26, 2019. Unexpectedly, it was still with Editor at the end of August. It was sent for an external review in the middle. Perhaps some reviewers didn’t have time to review it, so it was sent back to Editor again. I was so anxious to death. The boss asked me to wait slowly and not to urge the Editor. Later, at the beginning of September, it was finally sent for review. The review comments returned during the National Day. A total of 2 Reviewers. The first reviewer asked two small questions. The second reviewer asked the question of dosage. In short, they were all minor problems. They didn't let me supplement the experiments. I revised and returned it on October 8. It was accepted on October 15. So, it took almost 3 months from submission to acceptance. The main reason was that the review process was too slow, and the subsequent acceptance was very fast.

(0) Thank | 冰冷的落叶1

I feel the review process is fast. Some people say that the review time is long, may be because their papers are on different topics than mine. The initial review is took one month, and the decision was major revision, no deadline. However, I felt I shouldn’t wait too long to resubmit, so I set a timeframe of 45 days for myself. However, something happened and I felt I wouldn’t be able to finish on time so I wrote to the editor. The editor quickly responded. Eventually I used months to revise the paper. The editor was very nice, replied soon, and accepted the paper about one month after my re-submission. Very efficient, I think.

(1) Thank | 小面鱼

Fancy the reputation of RSC, submitted it for 4 days and have not submitted it for review. Expect good results.

(0) Thank | 我是31235

Junk Journal!!!In October last year, the first trial took more than six months to overhaul. The problem was not a lot. It was also seriously revised. After the repair, I continued to wait. After 4 months, I was rejected. I did not explain why.

(0) Thank | 23145736@qq.com

The submission speed is slower than JAFC.The article is not too strong.

(0) Thank | han

Submitting the review speed is slower than JAFC.The article is not too innovative.

(0) Thank | han

Check the weight before submiting?

(3) Thank | 来了

submitted in February, acceptd in May, the interim trial time is relatively long, the editor is super nice, and it is so patience to encounter such procrastination as me.I am very grateful. The external review opinion is very pertinent. It is directly accepted after the revision of the opinion. It is the animal experiment that requires ethical certification. This part is only reissued after the notification is received, but it is best to write it when submitting the manuscript.

(2) Thank | sunyifan529@163.com

3月31SubmissionApril 6th external auditReturn opinion on May 9th, minor repairRevised on May 16Accepted on May 21Overall, it is still very fast, and the opinions are very fair.

(3) Thank | 爱科研的小萝卜

Seeing the reputation of RSC, the submission was really not disappointing.Innovative requirements, strong experimental design, editorial and reviewers are very professional, and very small questions are pointed out.The review status changes quickly. Each time the revision is made, the editor will send it to the reviewer for re-examination. It is a journal that is flourishing and expects a new breakthrough in the impact factor.

(2) Thank | 彦北

Submitted on January 21, overhauled on March 5, rehabilitated on March 20, accepted on April 18.The reviewers are friendly and the questions they ask are not difficult to answer.Overall it is better.Hope it could help everyone!!!

(4) Thank | 花逝

I would like to ask if this journal is a district of the Academy of Sciences.

(3) Thank | 花逝

7月3日,Submission 8.19 Received feedback for repair; 9.5 days for submission; 9.8 days for about 2 months before and after acceptance!

(2) Thank | Anonymous

was invited as a reviewer and there is no deadline for reviewing!19天审会

(2) Thank | Anonymous

The quality of the article is not bad, but the impactThe factor is not high, only the first estimate is to compare with ACS's jafc. If you select for this journal, don't worry about IF. After all, RSC's reputation is there

(2) Thank | Anonymous