X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

WATER RESEARCH

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[WATER RESEARCH]Hello, you are Visitor Number 162473 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleWATER RESEARCH
Journal Title AbbreviationsWATER RES
ISSN0043-1354
E-ISSN1879-2448
h-index263
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
14.502.9322.542
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Engineering
Q11 / 132
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Waste Management and Disposal
Q11 / 100
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Ecological Modeling
Q11 / 31
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Civil and Structural Engineering
Q11 / 310
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
Q13 / 120
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Water Science and Technology
Q11 / 217

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)10.40%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/309/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/WR
Open AccessNo
PublisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEnvironmental Science
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1967
Annual Article Volume940
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0043-1354%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 4.4 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 53%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 3 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【WATER RESEARCH】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on WATER RESEARCH: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-27 09:29:00
reviewed the draft for nearly 3 months, and the comments I came back made me speechless.The editor said that he has found 9 reviewers. No one can review it. It does not meet the scope of the journal. I suggest you select for other journals.... This is the first time I got this opinion
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-17 04:34:00
5.31 submission, 8.28 return revision, moderation revision, a total of two reviewers, 10.22 return to review comments, 11.15 received.The review period is longer than EST. If you are not using the article urgently, you can try it.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-13 08:14:00
Talk about the submission experience of WR. Now the review cycle of WR is too long. It is normal for more than three months. This is one of them. Second, I don’t know why. WRAs long as one reviewer rejects the manuscript, it will reject the manuscript directly, even if the other reviewer gives a minor repair, and some reviewers are very irresponsible. This review should be said to be more pertinent and more positive, butThe reason for a reviewer's direct refusal made me speechless: because the basic grammatical errors were found in the article (he only pointed out a number after the absence of a half), indicating that the author did not write the article himself.Sufficiently perfect, the article is very good, but not suitable for publication in the WR journal. I don't believe that the articles published are not wrong. This is not a principled error. At least there should be opportunities for revision. I have also tried many drafts.#
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-12 14:18:00
water research China's contribution hit rate is 1%, and India is almost
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-01 15:18:00
speed is not generally slow, selectd in April, put in the editor's handOne month, there is a problem with the format to re-edit.Re-submitment, the news given in September.After the modification, Editor Assigned for one month and received in December.Submitted to receive eight months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-11 10:28:00
Water Research Although it’s a big name, it’s really not recommended.The editor was very irresponsible. 1. The review speed was slow, and it took 2 months to select.2. After reviewing for more than a month, the comments came back.3. Two reviewers, the first reviewer did not understand my work at all, even the basic photocatalysis is far from understanding, completely outside the door, I am doing research on photocatalytic mechanism, reviewer,Actually raised the question: "The confusing abbreviation "h+" is used where it seems to imply a proton. Normally &qu
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-06 16:11:00
recently selectd 1 and just got a notice of acceptance. WeThe article was pushed down by est. At that time, the four reviewers were over, but the editor didn't let it go, so the wr was transferred. Because the content competes with a big cow, we pay special attention to the speed of the journal. But unfortunately,It is not appropriate to choose wr. One month after submitting the manuscript, it is urged once to submit the review. After the review, the state becomes the editor for 2 months, and it is dragged for another month in the hands of the editor.It was a spokesperson who replied, and it almost collapsed during the period. However, it was over, and the result was changed slightly. It was received one week after returning. It is recommended that you do not choose wr for speed-critical research.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-30 10:13:00
From submissionTo receive a reply oneA total of 70 days of topic topic problems, reviwers think there are problems, and these problems lead to disagreement with WR scope, rejected..... Various tragedies~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-29 06:36:00
2February 2 submission, editor invited nearly one month, editor assigned one month, estimated to have entered the review, under reviewy one month, May 3 review review, major revision, MayOn the 21st, I was repaired. One day later, the editor invited, on May 24th, desicion in process, May 28th accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-15 22:04:00
11 selectd out, and received a rejection letter on the 15th.Requires innovation is very high, it seems that it is necessary to make great efforts in innovation.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-14 11:44:00
WR Speed ​​is not generally slow!Super bad, really will not select for this journal again!!Submitted in early November, the first-instance opinion came back on February 29, minor repair, and returned to the revised draft on March 12; on April 3, one reviewer passed, and another reviewer seized a question and did not let go!Continue to answer the question and revision; on April 12, the second revision of the draft, and then select; now and today!!Still no news!!Metamorphosis!!Md, I am going to graduate, and I have been in charge for half a year. NND wants to refuse to accept a direct sentence, metamorphosis, and now minor revisions, answered a few questions, the second trial revised and submitted out, all for more than a month, actually arrivedNo news yet!!!!!Abnormal!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-24 17:27:00
The second one has been acceptd, one month under review, overhaul, 1 week change, another month under review, minor repair, changed 2 days, received after 3 days
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-07 18:51:00
Initial Date Submitted is 05 Mar 2012, Status Date has changed to 15 Mar 2012, the second is 29 Mar 2012, the third is 06 Apr 2012, and Current Status is always Under Review, I don't know whatReason.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 24.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-01 19:28:00
I think WR is a rogue journal. I selectd in December last year. The status of editor assigned lasted for 3 months. The middle asked the editor for the reason, but the status is stillEditor assigned, after sending a letter with the editor, he said that it will be processed as soon as possible, today received the mail article directly rejected by the editor, the reason is a sentence.In the past two years, there have been several articles related to me published in each issue. I feel that some articles are not as creative as me.I am thinking about whether to send articles now, but also to see people, the same level of articles, even better than others, others sent out, your article has no chance to submit the trial, but also dragged on by the editor for more than 3 months, countOk, I don't need an article to graduate, or I really have to go crazy.Our group last year reviewed a total of 4 articles
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-29 15:01:00
last September, and sent back the review comments in January this year, overhaul, limited to one month, and returned to the revised draft on February 15th.Up to the present state is still editor invited, hey, speechless
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-16 15:24:00
feels quite fast from the select to accept just 3 months
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-07 13:03:00
article submittedThere are quite a few twists and turns.After being rejected for the first time, he was rejected one month later. After the teacher raised the point, he refuted the editorial opinion and agreed to re-submit after the revision.After that, I went back to the process again. After 2 months, I overhauled it and acceptd it a few days after submission.Therefore, if you feel that rejection is not very reasonable, you can try to refute it and try it. Maybe there will be good results.Come on!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-24 22:37:00
Submitted from May 6th to October 24th, it lasted for 5 and a half months. After a big change, I felt that WR was first given to a reviewer. If passed, thenGive another reviewer.The first review opinion was given on August 30th. The big change was returned to the editor on September 20th, and the process of editor invited, editor assigned and reviewer invited, under review, with editor, decision in process was experienced.On October 10th, the second reviewer commented that the first reviewer passed and the second reviewer requested a minor change.Returned to the editor on October 14th, first editor invi
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-16 23:21:00
water treatment NO.1, selectd twice, the editor is very serious and timely, replying questions quickly and patiently, better than some journalsNot a little bit.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-29 15:25:00
One no opinion, one refused to engage, refused, the opportunity to defend the defense is not
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-15 21:45:00
very agree with this statement "review is fast, 1 month is goodAfter the review, I will use the editor again. I will accept it directly after the revision of my manuscript. It seems that the editor will participate in the review." After about one month with my editor, the editor refused according to the opinions of two people, but the actualThe last two people seem to have said nothing about death.And the journal asks that once the rejection is rejected, the editor is not allowed to submit it again.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-13 09:18:00
Reviewing is fast, 1 month is fine, and Under review will be followed by editor.I will accept it directly after the revision of my manuscript. It seems that the editor will participate in the review.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-19 10:43:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-29 15:54:00
2010 impact factor 4.546, 0.2 higher than the previous year, continue to pay attention.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-28 20:15:00
The general review period is 3-6 months, and it is relatively fast. About one and a half months, it depends on the speed of reviewers and editors. In addition, the general requirements are relatively high
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [WATER RESEARCH]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service