WASTE MANAGEMENT

20180203-Submitted to Journal/sent back to author20180204-with editor20180205-editor invited/with editor20180206-under review20180329-Under Editor Evaluation20180330-significant revision20180521-Revision Submitted to Journal20180522-Under Review20180616-Accept. The overall efficiency is high, the review time is about 1 month (I have a reviewer who did not return their comments for a long time, and that why the review was from February 6  to March 29.

(2) Thank | S3709

2018.10.28 Submitted2018.10.30 reviewer(s) invited2018.11.09 under review2018.11.11 under review2018.11.12 under review2018.11.12 reviewer(s) invited2018.11.16 under review2018.11.27 with editor2018.11.28 with editor2018.12.02 with editor2018.12.03 with editor2018.12.04 major revison2019.01.13 submitted2019.01.15 accepted

(0) Thank | Mr.c

7.26 submit9.28significant revision10.22submit revision11.12minor revision (that is, a figure)11.18accept

(3) Thank | 张军强

The time of rejection is really long and drunk.

(0) Thank | 123zy

One day is rejected, saying that it does not meet the scope of the journal., 干干脆脆

(5) Thank | 3275

Journal processing manuscript is highly efficient, editing professional.

(0) Thank | ht1104705720qq.com

Received 6 April 2017Overhaul twice in the middleRevised 18 September 2017Accepted 19 September 2017Available online 10 October 2017Published in DecemberImpressions for editors are better. As long as the article has innovations, it feels that it will not be rejected due to language problems, and it will generally give you a chance to overhaul.

(0) Thank | yuantian3873@163.com

Nov 13 2017: Initial Date SubmittedNov 16 2017:with editorNov 27 2017: rejectOk, I said that I didn’t agree with the scope, but fortunately I didn’t delay too much time, and I changed one.

(1) Thank | o(∩_∩)o 哈哈

The three reviewers in the first trial had differences, and they found two reviewers, which slowed down the speed of review, but explained that the attitude was relatively strict.

(11) Thank | Z

After two months of submitteding, I directly told me that the subject does not meet the rejection... Two months... served.

(4) Thank | HeHe

Three and a half months without review, and then directly rejected, the middle of the Cui draft once, I feel that some old editors are too slow, processing editor Hans Albert van der Sloot

(3) Thank | 12345

submitted in December 2016, and will be returned in April 2017, received on May 10, 2017.It lasted for a long time, but it was finally received.

(0) Thank | jianwang4455@126.com

Real-time impact factor: 3.905.It is not low in the environment or engineering category.

(0) Thank | 江湖小生

This journal is biased towards the disposal of solid waste. The editor is very responsible. If the submission is not rejected, there will be a great chance.After submitting the manuscript for 2 months, I gave my review comments. The two reviewers gave a 20-day revision time and asked me to add some research methods.After returning, it is accepted after one month notice.It took a total of four months before and after, not too long.

(2) Thank | 江湖小生

This journal is biased towards solid waste disposal, editVery responsible, if the submission is not rejected, there is a big chance.After submitting the manuscript for 2 months, I gave my review comments. The two reviewers gave a 20-day revision time and asked me to add some research methods.After returning, it is accepted after one month notice.It took a total of four months before and after, not too long.

(0) Thank | yushengrong@163.com

This journal is an authoritative journal for the environment and waste management. The quality of the articles in it is obvious to everyone.The number of manuscripts per year is nearly 4,000, while the number of publications is about 400, and the rejection rate should be around 80% to 90%.Recently, I have submitted a paper on the impact of landfills on the surrounding environment. The review period is two months. The previous period with the editor is slow, and the review process is very fast.The journal currently has at least three reviewers, a more rigorous journal in the Environment and Waste Management journal, three reviewers, two minor revisions, and a final deputy editor who also participated in the review. A total of four reviewersThe opinion finally gave twenty days of overhaul.The paper was carefully revised, and the opinions of the four reviewers were replied one by one. After two days, the paper was received and proof was taken three days later.

(0) Thank | 飘絮人间

The difficulty is lower than RCR, mainly the direction of construction waste resources, and the reviewer's recommendation can be properly grasped.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Editing is very responsible.Personally feel that from the perspective of academic rigorous responsibility, it is stronger than hazardous materials.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

submitted for two months, still under review, will graduate soon, anxious ah

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Contribution: 2013/2/20 Reply: 2013/The 9/2 select was a review, which was drafted on August 22, because it was just half a year, and soon I received the result, which was unfortunately rejected.Two reviewers, I wonder if it is because the third reviewer has not given the results, so there are only two.The views of the two reviewers are quite the opposite. The first one is very good and basically accepted directly. The second one is very critical and directly rejects the draft.The comments of the two reviewers are attached below for your reference.Reviewer #1: The manuscript submitigated the *********. The results are

(1) Thank | Anonymous

The existing journal homepage URL is wrong and should be: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/waste-management/#description

(1) Thank | Anonymous

submitted out in April, now in mid-October, there is no result, I believe everyone sees me like thisDu Shuxin

(1) Thank | Anonymous

has been going out for a month now, but it is still under review. I saw that my predecessors have encountered it several times, so it is also peaceful, huh, huh.Hope to be in!==============================================================================The editor directly refused, and the editor was a half-month, and even the opportunity for the under review was not given.Do not understand ~~~ Is my theme biased?It is very consistent with ah~~

(1) Thank | Anonymous

This submission rate is unbelievable, and it is rejected after one month of submission.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal homepage: http://www.Journals.elsevier.com/waste-management/#description Latest rating: 2.4

(0) Thank | Anonymous