X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 45116 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleAPPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsAPPL SOIL ECOL
ISSN0929-1393
h-index99
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
6.501.2431.369
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
Q17 / 85
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Ecology
Q138 / 400
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Soil Science
Q118 / 135

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)6.40%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/524518/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/APSOIL
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaAgriculture and Forestry
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1994
Annual Article Volume246
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0929-1393%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 4.5 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 12.3 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 25%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 5.2 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY: Write a review
Author: xina


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-03-14 08:34:01
The article was submitted in October 2018. After an extremely long review, it was rejected and suggested being resubmitted in April, 2019. The more amazing experience is: The article was resubmitted in July 2019. One of the reviewers required minor revision, another one rejected it. The editor gave 28 days for revision. It was submitted in October, and the result was given at the end of December: Three of the reviewers agreed to accept it, and the other one rejected it (he was the one who rejected it in the first round). The editor gave 60 days, but I have no idea how to revise it! (Because the person who rejected the article said, the experiments were lacking in innovation, so it was rejected directly). It was submitted in early February, and it was with editor for 30 days. It received the notice on March 1, and it said “Please submit a clear copy, which I then will accept”. (Because the person who was always rejecting the article rejected the article with the reason that there were no changes found in the article. I had changed all the revision with red marks, and it may not be clear copy). So I canceled all the red marks and submitted the clear copy, and waited for good news. The strange thing was: It was sent for review again yesterday!!! Can I withdraw it? I really feel that this journal was not so good now, and the speed of processing articles was too slow, and the attitude of the reviewers was not responsible! If you are anxious to graduate, you should avoid it as you can.

(5) Thank | xina

Author: 白云


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-04-04 14:32:49
I submitted the paper on October 22, 2018, and there was no more news. I was not in a hurry to graduate, and I just waited in patience. This semester I received review comments (February 16). There were not too many comments. I carefully revised the paper and responded the comments one by one, mainly for the sentences of high similarities. I wrote it entirely by myself, but it still repeated more than 20%. Every sentence had been revised as much as possible. When it was resubmitted, I waited for a few days. On March 12, they required us to modify the highlighted sections, and modified them twice. (Actually, I had no idea what the editor-in-chief means. It didn’t exceed the word limit, and I thought I had made the focal points stand out. But to meet the requirement of the editor-in-chief, I revised it again and again, trying to make it more and more concisely). It got accepted in about a week after resubmission! After acceptance, the post-editing process is very efficient. In general, the efficiency is relatively good, the editor is very responsible. At least it didn’t make me wait in vain.

(21) Thank | 白云

Author: guopeng.sci@gmail.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-14 09:33:30
We had a so-so experience with this journal. The first round of reviews took 7 months. We re-submitted after completing the revisions, and the review period was even longer the second time. If you need to publish quickly, I don’t recommend this journal. However, with that said, the reviewers were very professional and the editor was communicative and helpful.

(0) Thank | guopeng.sci@gmail.com

Author: zhouxjwhu@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-01 09:37:33
It’s true that it’s true, and I’m thinking about the direction before I select, and I’m lucky.On the second day of the select, I saw someone on the small woodworm asking, with the editor for a month, the reviewer invited is another month, that is, there is no under review for two months.I asked him to know the editor-in-chief of me, the Italian Judith Ascher-Jenull.After half a month, my status is still with editor. Waiting for graduation is really anxious. I regret to select for this journal and I want to withdraw the manuscript.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | zhouxjwhu@163.com

Author: 405314408@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-15 20:46:28
This journal is too slow, 10 months have not given the result
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 405314408@qq.com

Author: Alice


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-15 15:43:19
under review has been almost two months, no news, it is really slower review
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Alice

Author: wanghanbo0014@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-29 15:41:40
After giving the result for 6 months, it was rejected.So disgusting, can quickly point out the results, a bit of pit 爹
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | wanghanbo0014@163.com

Author: gao


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-18 18:38:27
is too slow, no receipt for ten months,
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | gao

Author: 646483242@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-03 11:48:46
has been submiting for 4 months. I haven't returned in the first trial. It is really super invincible.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 646483242@qq.com

Author: guopeng.sci@gmail.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-14 09:34:53
Received at Editorial Office 24 Feb 2017Article revised 8 Sep 2017Article accepted for publication 11 Sep 2017This paper was re-submited after the reviewer rejected the manuscript.The first reviewers did not agree to the publication and gave comments on the review.I found that all the opinions can be explained, and after re-submitment, the time period is longer.But editors and reviewers are very responsible.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | guopeng.sci@gmail.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-29 10:01:35
The speed of reviewing is already relatively fast, no need for layout fees and review fees.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 1739885233@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-07-05 16:21:46
has been submitted for two months,Always process the underreview state, I don't know what message will be when there is a message last?Slow down!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1739885233@qq.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-01 19:41:00
has been submitted for more than 4 months, and there is no news yet, hey, it is really slow, I suggest you switch to other related journals.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-06 11:06:00
is more difficult, time is longer, it took 5 and a half months.The first overhaul was 3 months, and the second minor repair was 2 months.Students who are anxious to graduate, it is recommended to select for others.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-11 21:17:00
This journal is really slow.The first rework was about three and a half months, and the opinion was overhauled. The second rework was about one and a half months. The opinions were minor, and there was basically no opinion. Both reviews agreed to accept. The second rework went back and waited for two days to be acceptd.It took a total of 6 months to complete.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-23 14:11:00
A little bad select,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-19 14:23:00
Journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 土壤动物
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-20 23:51:00
This journal is also good. It is a journal in the second district, focusing on ecological research related to soil animals.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service