X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 300533 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleAPPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Journal Title AbbreviationsAPPL PHYS LETT
ISSN0003-6951
E-ISSN1077-3118
h-index401
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.001.3431.252
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
Q15 / 54

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)7.60%
Official Websitehttp://apl.aip.org/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://apl.peerx-press.org/cgi-bin/main.plex
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER INST PHYSICS, CIRCULATION & FULFILLMENT DIV, 2 HUNTINGTON QUADRANGLE, STE 1 N O 1, MELVILLE, USA, NY, 11747-4501
Subject AreaPhysics
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyWeekly
Year Publication Started1962
Annual Article Volume1898
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0003-6951%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.4 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 88%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)
  Reviews on APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-16 00:23:00
To SUSAN in the ferroelectric area, the first-instance minor repair, the second trial and the reviewer to the overhaul, raised a few more difficult questions, but fortunately discussed with the boss to repair it, wrote a letter to seriously write 5 pages, and then selectd revisedReceived in 4 days, the review speed is super fast, and the 77-day two repairs are finally acceptd.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-14 20:35:00
The review speed is very fast. One reviewer has a high requirement for the novelty of the paper. If it is not new enough, it will be directly rejected by the editor.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-19 11:13:00
The review speed is very fast, a reviewer, novel work, beautiful figures are very important, technical editors are very strict, and the chart format, font size, and clarity requirements are very strict.Overall, it is very good. In the field of applied physics and materials, the authoritative journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-10 13:09:00
APL does not need to say more about the authority of applied physics. In addition to the novelty of the article, it is more focused now.There are physical contents, the length has been increased to 4 pages, the reviewers are very professional, and the opinions are very pertinent. Although the impact factor is not too high, for people who engage in physics, the meaning is far from what the influence factor can represent...It can be said that the physics does not know APL, and it is also awkward to submit in SCI...Personally feel that APL, JAP these old journals are still very good..
Show Review in Original Language
(29) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-07 00:13:00
The journal with good physical class, the first select, the reviewer is very professional, revised twice, although the time of the support is a bit long, but I also learned a lot from it, next timeThen select
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-29 23:11:00
is more fortunate, the results will be less than one month after the select, it is recommended to make a small change.There is only one reviewer, I feel that I am not a peer, and the question I ask does not hit the key.I changed it one month before and after (my boss was more picky), and immediately accepted it after I turned it in, and then waited for more than a month before I came out.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-12 18:55:00
APL is the highest journal of applied physics, and its authority is beyond doubt.However, APL also has a lot of hydrology. Personally, the first choice for pure physics is PR series, followed by APL.In particular, PRB, many of them changed to APL after the PRB was rejected.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-20 17:22:00
selectd for one and found that it was rejected directly.Later I just wanted to understand that there might be a function in the submission system to see if there is any reference to the APL literature. If not, it would be rejected directly.The letter sent to me by the editor is also written directly, saying that it is still published in the journal you quoted.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-27 10:08:00
I also come to the top, good journals, no need to say more, scientific research does not know APL, and the papers are also awesome!The first choice of the lab's teachers and brothers and sisters' papers was APL. They recorded a lot of articles, and they made a small thing, a little creative, but they are far apart from the papers of the index!With the encouragement of the teacher, a detailed manuscript was written. After the teacher looked at it, he proposed three points, which is the essence of APL: A stands for application background extension, P stands for physical model analysis, and L stands for novelty and innovation.The importance of the paper is first, L, then P, and finally A!Under the guidance of such a thought, I firmly implemented the L-P-A sequence to reorganize the paper: L is the teacher to point it out; P, it took a long time, about a month, read more than 30 related articles,
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-27 10:56:00
This is a relatively fast journal. It is very fast to accept and reject. If you are more innovative, you can choose to contribute. Last year, you selectd for one.3 months, this year submited two, one submission was accepted four days later (this has a certain luck component, but this article has been prepared for a year and a half, before the revision is more), another is still under trial, because ChristmasFestival, I don’t know if it’s time for delay. I’ve been reviewing it for a while... From my point of view, APL does have a lot of good articles, but there is no shortage of irrigation. From the trend of IF decline in recent years, I feel Chinese.There is a lot of irrigation (personal opinion).In terms of submission, the first submission may be annoying, and it will be fine in the future.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-15 18:20:00
just submitted an article, in the under review, I hope that I am lucky!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-21 13:35:00
Some time ago, I submitted an article about molecular dynamics simulation to the journal (with the background of the application). I received the review comments yesterday. The editor said that it was rejected, but the system showedLet the select be revised, wondering?If I refused to submit the manuscript when I selectd in the past, I would not let the display of the revised manuscript continue. Please enlighten the heroes. Is it revised according to the review comments?Decision letter:
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-24 17:36:00
The authoritative journal for the application of physics is very efficient.I selectd for an article, and the review was done in a few hours.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-13 22:43:00
is relatively lucky.The biggest feeling is that it is not dragging at all, too fast!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-05 19:53:00
In 2008 and 2010, I selectd twice, the first time I was rejected, because the intersting item is No, I think it should be the direction that is not hot.The second acceptance, it seems that there is no modification, it is about the algorithm.The overall feeling is that because it is a journal of the nature of express, there are novel and unique articles, but some swords are slanted or articles with not much theoretical innovation or application background are also collected, and the collection is inexplicable.In short, IF does not mean everything, good journals also have junk articles.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-23 10:52:00
has submitted a total of five submissions, two of them, one for review.The article should have a very new physics thought. If the result is not good, it is necessary to read the whole article.In recent years, the standard of manuscripts has improved, and the most common reason is often because the manuscript lacks profound physical connotations.Therefore, the most suitable job for submitting APL is that it is sufficiently innovative and, through in-depth discussion, draws very clear and straightforward conclusions.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-18 20:56:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://apl.aip.org/
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-15 19:30:00
The world knows that APL is the top journal of condensed matter and material physics.The first review is for one month, minor revision, and acceptance.However, the second shot, just in time to catch up with AIP to reduce the amount of manuscripts, Appeal post-review is still a tragedy, reviewers believe that there is a problem with the methodology, and there is some truth to it.In short, good journals.There are 2 articles in
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-07-27 08:52:00
, which are more authoritative in this field.I see publications every day.The articles are mixed, but they are good.Reviewers are all good, academic big cattle, generally rejected and fast.There are also reasons for being rejected, and many submissions do not work.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-07-21 15:02:00
That heroes help me find the template of Applied Physics Letters
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-07-16 08:31:00
Reviewer is very professional, more difficult
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-07-03 09:01:00
Creative novelty is very important
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-07-02 20:47:00
Editing is very strict.I have planted an article this year.It's not easy
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-29 21:29:00
selectd twice, once accepted, and the trial was quick.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-29 03:11:00
If2010 3.82
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)

Start your review of [APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service