X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 300496 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleAPPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Journal Title AbbreviationsAPPL PHYS LETT
ISSN0003-6951
E-ISSN1077-3118
h-index401
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.001.3431.252
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous)
Q15 / 54

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)7.60%
Official Websitehttp://apl.aip.org/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://apl.peerx-press.org/cgi-bin/main.plex
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER INST PHYSICS, CIRCULATION & FULFILLMENT DIV, 2 HUNTINGTON QUADRANGLE, STE 1 N O 1, MELVILLE, USA, NY, 11747-4501
Subject AreaPhysics
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyWeekly
Year Publication Started1962
Annual Article Volume1898
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0003-6951%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.4 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 88%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)
  Reviews on APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS: Write a review
Author: zhujiakun@hust.edu.cn


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-29 19:38:45
review 5 days directly edited to the data, now it is more and more difficult to select for an APL
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | zhujiakun@hust.edu.cn

Author: asiawan


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-23 08:00:33
A reviewer is a bit slow, dragging for more than 2 months.The journal has been submitted to the reception for a total of 101 days.I feel that if I am more biased, I still provide several professional reviewers.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | asiawan

Author: arlafa@yeah.net


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-05 09:57:01
The first independent completion of writing and modifying APL, lasting 100 days, the early selection of reviewersThe stage was delayed for nearly one month. From the time of the select to the first review, it took two months, a little longer than the APL average review cycle. Three reviewers were found, but they are usually two reviewers.People, for the first time, replied to the opinions of the three reviewers and returned to the minor repairs. Only the opinions of the second and third reviewers were returned, and they returned to minor repairs and acceptd.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | arlafa@yeah.net

Author: anqi1986@126.com


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-16 11:23:06
The first sci, I feel very lucky, it lasted 69 days.APL efficiency is much higher than most domestic journals.A total of 2 reviewers are in related fields, and the opinions put forward are also very good, which is conducive to improving the quality of the article. Personally, there is no such thing as watering by individual people.The status of the manuscript given by the journal is very detailed. It is clear that you know which step to take and the feedback is timely.During the period, I often come to the forum to see everyone's posts, and now I will give back.
Show Review in Original Language
(46) Thank | anqi1986@126.com

Author: Thermal


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-14 13:12:27
The number of papers published in 2016 is half of that in 2014, and as the volume of submission increases,The difficulty of submitting trials has increased by many times, and the number of reviewers has increased substantially. The review is obviously stricter. It can be seen that the ambitious APL has returned since the editor-in-chief.It is now much harder to publish an APL than it was a few years ago, and it is almost a PRL.
Show Review in Original Language
(79) Thank | Thermal

Author: LW


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-09 09:47:40
has published 4 APLs before and after.Two of the results are very good, in fact, the PRL is also able to select.Now the references to these two articles have exceeded 200.Unfortunately, the influence of APL is gradually declining now.
Show Review in Original Language
(18) Thank | LW

Author: wsl


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-01-03 12:27:00
Real-time impact factor 2.92
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | wsl

Author: kiss


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-22 09:14:02
Irrigation Journal, will definitely blacklist in the future, not worth submiting.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | kiss

Author: 探索者


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-23 11:56:35
APL allows the Chinese to fill too much water, lacking the original highlights, and really declining, and the influence is as straight as his IF.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 探索者

Author: galaxy


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-22 11:44:50
is so slow, let the editorial department delay two weeks, sweat...Manuscript Submitted to Editorial Office 29-Jun-2016 05:03:27Decision Sent to Author 02-Sep-2016 16:03:14Revised Manuscript Received from Author 15-Sep-2016 07:30:40Decision Sent to Author 20-Oct-2016 10:09:47Manuscript Sent to Production 20-Oct-2016 11:39:44
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | galaxy

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-08 21:48:16
APL The editing efficiency is really high. After the revision, the results of the format review will be answered within one day!give it a like!
Show Review in Original Language
(17) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 疯狂猪头


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-07-30 22:41:57
This journal is mixed, but there are too many differences, especially Chinese people like to fill this journal, do not meditation to do research, the picture is short and fast, many research and garbage are similar, more than 90%APL articles are basically garbage.
Show Review in Original Language
(20) Thank | 疯狂猪头

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-15 21:47:00
The first time I selectd for APL, it was not easy.After the first draft was submitted, the revised comments were received within one and a half months of the month; after one and a half months of revision, the revised manuscript was submitted, and it was accepted for about one month.It took almost 4 months before and after.The reviewer's review is quite fast, two weeks for the first trial and three days for the second trial.However, it was a long time in the editorial office and the requirements were strict.The overall feeling is that the requirements for novelty and physical mechanism are high.
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-07 03:35:00
quite awesome!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-06 15:19:00
Stage Start Date Under Review 2012-11-12 21:55:56 Securing Reviewer(s) 2012-11-04 15:57:45 Figure Quality Analysis Completed 2012-10-23 02:33:52 Securing Reviewer(s) 2012-10-20 23:22:55 Under Consideration - Editorial Office
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-27 09:41:00
has been submitted for review, and the results are expected to be reviewed. 40 minutes... StageStart DateEditorial Evaluation - Editor2012-12-12 15:11:10Under Review2012-12-12 14:31:32Securing Reviewer(s)2012-12-06 10:42:09Under Consideration - Editorial Office2012-12-05 16:18:14Figu
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-28 17:00:00
first time select, reviewer review is very carefulAfter reviewing for one month, the reviewer Reconsider for APL after mandatory revision (major), the overall feeling of reviewer direction is biased, do not understand the application value of the material; after the revision, Securing Reviewer (s) directly accepted for two weeks, I still feelVery unexpected.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-04 02:13:00
APL is now basically unlimited, and has been seen on pages 4-6 after typesetting, and it also allows for the addition of supplementary information.It can be seen that the journal has been changing.However, there is no substantial improvement in the level of his article.After the space limit is relaxed, the features are no longer obvious. There will be more and more articles focusing on comprehensiveness, but will reduce the proportion of articles with strong innovation.And now it's time to start collecting the face fee.In general, APL's articles can still be handed.It is not very difficult to submit a manuscript, and the review speed is very fast, which is worth a shot.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-22 22:42:00
APL Review is very fast, of course, the editing requirements of each district are different.The first article in the APL submitted iron and electric area is about the high K aspect. When it comes to SUSAN, the first trial minor repair, the second trial overhaul, the same is to ask a few very difficult problems, we must seriously change, and receive it one week after repair.Submitted in 2012.2.28, received in 5.14.The second part of the optoelectronic district, only one reviewer, 8.27 submission, 9.18 directly received, the evaluation is 11 Yes, Very Good.In general, APL reviewers are big bulls in the industry. As long as your articles have bright spots, novel enough, theoretical support is very important, and then there are more references to APL articles. I have a total of 29 references, including 1
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-31 14:40:00
The younger brother just selectd for an APL, and the editor gave it to Xiao Xiu. He just submitted the revised draft the day before. I don’t know if he will find the reviewer again.忐忑~~~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-23 10:11:00
The younger brother recently got an APL!The review is fast!How do the impact factors always falter?!!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-21 12:17:00
A manuscript of 2009, after nearly a year of tossing, was JAP.So it has only been quoted a dozen times.A short manuscript in 2012, after 150 days, first refused to draft (fair); do not give up, appeal to select again, then consider (good) after modification; modify, directly accept (very good).During the period of review, it was very long to find several reviewers for each review.I later forgot to have this manuscript.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-14 09:01:00
So far 3 articles
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-03 14:16:00
Upload files of the submission interface How to select the file, press upload always does not respond, have you encounteredA similar situation of the bug to give advice
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-19 14:35:00
2012.05.11 contribution 2012.06.04 Return to the comments, minor repair 2012.06.12 select revised draft 2012.06.19 Receive
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)

Start your review of [APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service