SIGNAL PROCESSING

It was submitted in January 18, and it was stayed with the editor for a month, and then it became under review. After almost two months, it became under editor evaluation. After waiting for more than one month, it got one rejection, one major revision, and one minor revision. The editor required a major revision. After revised and submitted, it was changed to under review after in the hands of the editor for a week, and two months later, the status changed to required reviews completed. Then a week after minor revision, it was accepted. The third reviewer still had some minor problems, and it took about one month for the resubmission to be accepted. It took more than 9 months from submission to acceptance.

(2) Thank | fcq009

The reason I submitted to this journal was because I had heard that the journal was reviewing quickly. For me, the entire review process was very smooth and there was a reply in 2 months. Both reviewers suggested that minor revisions be made and then it could be published. The journal's submission system is relatively complete and lets you recommend reviewers, so you can recommend a professor who knows your research. The staff is very responsible, the whole system works very well! Personally, I think this is a good journal.

(3) Thank | Anonymous

2016.12.6, I remember that it was rejected in 2017.4, but only returned the comments of a reviewer, and his opinion is actually quite good.

(1) Thank | Martin

Submitted for 2 weeks, the editor said that I did not understand some of the formula descriptions in my article!tragedy!However, you can select again

(0) Thank | Radar

is not very good, after all, it is a good journal in signal processing.

(8) Thank | ll

first submissionThe 2 month review was directly rejected, and the rejection was re-submitted.Experienced the following time process:2017.03.31: Submitted to Journal2017.04.04: With Editor2017.04.21: Under Review2017.05.08: Under Review2017.06.16: Under Editor Rvaluation2017.06.22: Revise2017.07.10: April Submitted to Journal2017.07.11: With Editor2017.07.19: Under Review2017.09.10: Complete Accepted

(43) Thank | tyjia1992@163.com

3月29Submission, July 10 rejected,One of the two reviewers felt unfamiliar with the content of the article, and the other commented on it was very pertinent.

(0) Thank | snbsh

Contributed to the Ching Ming Festival (April 4th), June 27th, replied to the minor repair.Very good journal.

(11) Thank | mjhcq

Qingming Festival (April 4th) contribution, June 27th, reply to minor repairs.Very good journal.

(0) Thank | mjhcq

has passed 3 articles.Two of the most recent ones have been drafted: one after the overhaul (1A, 1R); the first one is based on (2A, 2R).The difficulty of recruitment has increased, and the impact factor has increased year by year. It is already a 2 district journal in the field of signal processing.

(4) Thank | 行者

Two-month reviewer refused to engage, edit refused to engage

(4) Thank | aaa

before submiting in a paper, all four reviewers refused.I selectd for one this year, selectd in June, returned in the first trial in October, three review drafts, two minor repairs, one overhaul, the editor gave the overhaul, and returned to the revised draft one week later, which was edited to the accept one month later.The language and innovation requirements are still relatively high

(0) Thank | 陈锋

selectd for a week, or Submitted to Journal, when to start reviewing, a little anxious.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The first submitment in 2011, the editor directly refused because it was not suitable for this journal.The second submitment, 12 years in December, 13 years in late February, the small change notice, received in March.The format requirements are very strict.A reviewer can be suggested.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Fortunately, one of the reports of Signal Processing has a mixed level of feelings. If you want a manuscript, you need a bit of luck!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

AE The team is very perfect.Voted twice: once is a long article, directly acceptd after the overhaul, it took seven months to submit the manuscript to the recruitment; one was a newsletter, and after three months, the manuscript was rejected, and the question was very sharp.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submit twice, one reviewLess than three months, nearly four months, the speed is faster; both encounters unfortunate, I feel that the reviewers are very professional, and the opinions are very specific.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

09 submitted on November 9th, and received the manuscript notice on January 28th, 2010.The speed is still very fast, and the evaluation of the four reviewers is not very good.Two of them suggest modifying the form of the essay.A reviewer made a bunch of comments.The other is more neutral.The overall feeling is that the journal reviewers are more professional and require a deeper theoretical depth to be able to accept.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Research direction: Information Science Electronics and Information System Signal Theory and Signal Processing Submission Period: About 13 months I have been submiting in this journal for more than 13 months, and minor repairs have been 2 months now.The status is still: Under review, I don't know how long it will take to get results.I hope to be able to.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Editor-in-Chief said that the title of my thesis does not seem to be suitable for the journal. It was rejected within a week and depressed.Change to other.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Research direction: Information Science Electronics and Information System Signal Theory and Signal Processing Submission Period: About 6 months Recruitment: The result has been unknown

(0) Thank | Anonymous

我After submitting the journal, more than 9 months of review comments, a reviewer agreed to modify the acceptance, a reviewer made some comments, saying that the innovation is not enough, did not say accept or not, the editor gave the opinion is rejected.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I have been submiting in this journal for more than 3 months, and the status is still: Under Review, I don’t know how long it will take.It seems that the hit rate is not high!I hope to be able to.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

"I feel that the amount of manuscripts is very large recently. I submitted the manuscript recently. The editor-in-chief said that my thesis title does not seem to be suitable for the journal (the journal has actually published this article), and it directly retreats.Manuscript. Depressed."

(1) Thank | Anonymous

selectd this journal for no reason, was rejected, and finally submitted another IF higher than it.

(0) Thank | Anonymous