X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

SIGNAL PROCESSING

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[SIGNAL PROCESSING]Hello, you are Visitor Number 81328 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleSIGNAL PROCESSING
Journal Title AbbreviationsSIGNAL PROCESS
ISSN0165-1684
h-index115
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
8.801.0642.055
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Control and Systems Engineering
Q121 / 242
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Signal Processing
Q114 / 103
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Q163 / 670
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Software
Q141 / 373
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Q110 / 84

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)10.10%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/product/cws_home/505662
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/SIGPRO
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1979
Annual Article Volume331
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0165-1684%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 6.1 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 6.8 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 50%
Data from Elsevier: 18%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 8.1 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【SIGNAL PROCESSING】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on SIGNAL PROCESSING: Write a review
Author: fcq009


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-05-07 15:55:42
It was submitted in January 18, and it was stayed with the editor for a month, and then it became under review. After almost two months, it became under editor evaluation. After waiting for more than one month, it got one rejection, one major revision, and one minor revision. The editor required a major revision. After revised and submitted, it was changed to under review after in the hands of the editor for a week, and two months later, the status changed to required reviews completed. Then a week after minor revision, it was accepted. The third reviewer still had some minor problems, and it took about one month for the resubmission to be accepted. It took more than 9 months from submission to acceptance.

(2) Thank | fcq009

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 信号处理
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-15 18:40:00
The reason I submitted to this journal was because I had heard that the journal was reviewing quickly. For me, the entire review process was very smooth and there was a reply in 2 months. Both reviewers suggested that minor revisions be made and then it could be published. The journal's submission system is relatively complete and lets you recommend reviewers, so you can recommend a professor who knows your research. The staff is very responsible, the whole system works very well! Personally, I think this is a good journal.

(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Martin


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-20 15:38:14
2016.12.6, I remember that it was rejected in 2017.4, but only returned the comments of a reviewer, and his opinion is actually quite good.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Martin

Author: Radar


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-14 16:06:28
Submitted for 2 weeks, the editor said that I did not understand some of the formula descriptions in my article!tragedy!However, you can select again
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Radar

Author: ll


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-02 12:58:10
is not very good, after all, it is a good journal in signal processing.
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | ll

Author: tyjia1992@163.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-11 09:31:21
first submissionThe 2 month review was directly rejected, and the rejection was re-submitted.Experienced the following time process:2017.03.31: Submitted to Journal2017.04.04: With Editor2017.04.21: Under Review2017.05.08: Under Review2017.06.16: Under Editor Rvaluation2017.06.22: Revise2017.07.10: April Submitted to Journal2017.07.11: With Editor2017.07.19: Under Review2017.09.10: Complete Accepted
Show Review in Original Language
(43) Thank | tyjia1992@163.com

Author: snbsh


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-12 12:26:43
3月29Submission, July 10 rejected,One of the two reviewers felt unfamiliar with the content of the article, and the other commented on it was very pertinent.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | snbsh

Author: mjhcq


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-04 16:28:58
Contributed to the Ching Ming Festival (April 4th), June 27th, replied to the minor repair.Very good journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | mjhcq

Author: mjhcq


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-04 16:28:46
Qingming Festival (April 4th) contribution, June 27th, reply to minor repairs.Very good journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | mjhcq

Author: 行者


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-21 10:20:58
has passed 3 articles.Two of the most recent ones have been drafted: one after the overhaul (1A, 1R); the first one is based on (2A, 2R).The difficulty of recruitment has increased, and the impact factor has increased year by year. It is already a 2 district journal in the field of signal processing.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 行者

Author: aaa


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-28 11:36:23
Two-month reviewer refused to engage, edit refused to engage
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | aaa

Author: 陈锋


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-12-23 16:24:37
before submiting in a paper, all four reviewers refused.I selectd for one this year, selectd in June, returned in the first trial in October, three review drafts, two minor repairs, one overhaul, the editor gave the overhaul, and returned to the revised draft one week later, which was edited to the accept one month later.The language and innovation requirements are still relatively high
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 陈锋

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-27 22:40:00
selectd for a week, or Submitted to Journal, when to start reviewing, a little anxious.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-09 15:06:00
The first submitment in 2011, the editor directly refused because it was not suitable for this journal.The second submitment, 12 years in December, 13 years in late February, the small change notice, received in March.The format requirements are very strict.A reviewer can be suggested.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-05 18:35:00
Fortunately, one of the reports of Signal Processing has a mixed level of feelings. If you want a manuscript, you need a bit of luck!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-20 10:23:00
AE The team is very perfect.Voted twice: once is a long article, directly acceptd after the overhaul, it took seven months to submit the manuscript to the recruitment; one was a newsletter, and after three months, the manuscript was rejected, and the question was very sharp.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-07 23:17:00
Submit twice, one reviewLess than three months, nearly four months, the speed is faster; both encounters unfortunate, I feel that the reviewers are very professional, and the opinions are very specific.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-08 17:34:00
09 submitted on November 9th, and received the manuscript notice on January 28th, 2010.The speed is still very fast, and the evaluation of the four reviewers is not very good.Two of them suggest modifying the form of the essay.A reviewer made a bunch of comments.The other is more neutral.The overall feeling is that the journal reviewers are more professional and require a deeper theoretical depth to be able to accept.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-18 22:12:00
Research direction: Information Science Electronics and Information System Signal Theory and Signal Processing Submission Period: About 13 months I have been submiting in this journal for more than 13 months, and minor repairs have been 2 months now.The status is still: Under review, I don't know how long it will take to get results.I hope to be able to.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-28 09:05:00
Editor-in-Chief said that the title of my thesis does not seem to be suitable for the journal. It was rejected within a week and depressed.Change to other.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-17 23:17:00
Research direction: Information Science Electronics and Information System Signal Theory and Signal Processing Submission Period: About 6 months Recruitment: The result has been unknown
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-14 15:54:00
我After submitting the journal, more than 9 months of review comments, a reviewer agreed to modify the acceptance, a reviewer made some comments, saying that the innovation is not enough, did not say accept or not, the editor gave the opinion is rejected.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-14 00:04:00
I have been submiting in this journal for more than 3 months, and the status is still: Under Review, I don’t know how long it will take.It seems that the hit rate is not high!I hope to be able to.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-09 10:19:00
"I feel that the amount of manuscripts is very large recently. I submitted the manuscript recently. The editor-in-chief said that my thesis title does not seem to be suitable for the journal (the journal has actually published this article), and it directly retreats.Manuscript. Depressed."
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-23 11:44:00
selectd this journal for no reason, was rejected, and finally submitted another IF higher than it.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [SIGNAL PROCESSING]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service