X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 112630 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleAPPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsAPPL MICROBIOL BIOT
ISSN0175-7598
E-ISSN1432-0614
h-index198
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
6.701.0581.179
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Biotechnology
Q145 / 275
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Q116 / 105

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)8.00%
Official Websitehttps://www.springer.com/journal/253
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/AMAB
Open AccessNo
PublisherSPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10013
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationGERMANY
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1975
Annual Article Volume742
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0175-7598%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 50%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-22 14:26:00
7.6Submission, 7.13 Under review, 7.25 status change is still Under review.No. 9.21 results.2 reviewers: one raised a lot of comments, details.Another objection directly to the paper research content, that the experimental part of the data is incomplete and needs to be supplemented.After editing the comprehensive opinions, they are directly involved.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-20 14:47:00
6 At the end of the month, the editor directly called back, saying that the wild strain must provide the number of the public deposit. After the revision, it was re-submited in early July. With the editor, it will be under review for almost 10 days, one month later.At the end of the manuscript, it took another week to return to the comments. The two reviewers had a harsh opinion, lacked new ideas, and the experimental part was not complete. One was not very picky. The editor decided to reject the draft, but allowed the supplementary experiment to be greatly revised.hard pitch.I feel that AMB is currently submiting too many people. The results of the review that may have been overhauled in the past are now rejected directly by the editor. I just don't object to your re-entry, and the shelves are getting bigger and bigger...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-18 03:55:00
I tried to select for it, and I quickly returned to the editorial opinion, saying that the picture could not be in the text, it must be placed in the document or in a separate file, and one page at a time, saying nothing can beWhat conclusions. The editor received a rejection letter the next day after the rehab, the cup was set, but the editor said that I asked for AMB express, I checked it, charged, and was not included in the SCI, ready to change.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-09 10:34:00
This is the second AMB of 俺, both of which combine molecular simulation and biochemical properties of enzymes.The manuscript selectd on June 20th, officially accepted on September 4th, and was revised twice in the middle. The first time was a major overhaul. The result received on July 13th was revised back on July 23, 8On the 6th of the month, the editor said that he was dissatisfied and needed to continue the overhaul. He was repaired on August 29 and received on September 4.The experience of this submission is: 1. Don't have small grammar and spelling mistakes, it will affect the reviewer's evaluation of your article. 2. Modify every comment of the reviewer as much as possible, no matter if you think he is notIrrational
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-11 16:14:00
The editors and reviewers are very rigorous, the review speed is very fast, and the opinions are very pertinent. Generally speaking, the journal level is average.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-20 07:16:00
Give everyone my contribution history for reference.Apr-17 submitted to journalApr-17 under reviewMay-10 major revisionMay-25 revision to journalMay-26 major revision The editor of the revision is not satisfied, and the overhaul must be meticulous. Every comment of the reviewer must take care of Jun-5.Revision to journalJun-9 minor revision
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-03 00:32:00
The speed of review is indeed very fast, and the comments are returned in less than a month. Unfortunately, the tragedy, the two reviewers made a lot of comments, but did not refuseIt is said that it can be received after modification, and the result is edited and rejected.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-13 16:24:00
Editing is very NICE, and the review speed is also very fast.The first draft was submitted on March 5, and it was rehabilitated on March 29. Two reviewers submitted some comments, Major review, revised on April 9 and accepted on April 11.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-12 22:15:00
just entered the subject, read a lot of literature and wrote a review, starting from high to low to start the journal, the first one is AMB, after three or four days after submission, the status becomes under review.More than seven weeks to give the review comments, denied, the results are not unexpected, but the review comments are only one reviewer, it is very uncomfortable, this is not a bit strange, generally at least two reviewers,I recommended that there are ten reviewers. The editor-in-chief encourages a good re-submitment, but I plan to change the journals with lower grades and try again
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-27 18:30:00
journal soon.On January 31st, it will return on March 10th, major revision, re-submitment on March 14th, and reception on March 15th.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-29 12:51:00
The first-instance cycle is about 1 month. The format and language requirements are high. The requirements for innovation are increasing year by year. Although it has been rejected, this journal is still good in the field of microbial technology.Fighting for
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-19 15:32:00
Although the tragedy, but the journal is still very good, the advice is very pertinent, the speed is also very fast!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-09 11:00:00
SCI(2010):3.28 SCI(2009):2.896 SCI(2008):2.569
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-19 16:43:00
I feel that the review speed is OK, I selectd once, oneThe result of the month is nothing but a tragedy.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-19 14:09:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://www.springer.com/chemistry/biotechnology/journal/253
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-17 16:23:00
I have submitted more than 3 monthsIn the results of the review, I thought that this journal is relatively fast, and the result is tragedy
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-14 10:13:00
I have seen the feeling, I have the opportunity to select for a try
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-07-07 14:55:00
Easy.In less than one month, I gave the review comments, and gave me three weeks to modify the time. After the revised manuscript was returned, I received the
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-21 23:41:00
journal. The amount of manuscript is relatively large, and the editor is very dedicated!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-31 10:35:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-16 19:19:00
Magazine is quite good, good influence, edit dedication
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-08 16:00:00
3 Submitted on the 26th draft, April 28No. Revised, two reviewers submitted some comments, submitted the revised draft on May 6, and accepted it the next day (May 7 is Saturday, admire the editorial spirit).The article is best to have innovations and higher language requirements.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-04-15 21:20:00
The review period is fast, generally recommend more than three reviewers, preferably not home.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-04-12 16:52:00
The review cycle is very fast. One month or less must be separated from the discussion part. In addition, it is relatively easy to be innovative.There is also a recommendation for reviewers.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 微Life Science技术各方面
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-01-21 10:48:00
The data volume is quite large
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service