Science China-Technological Sciences

The review process is very fast, but they have been in the state of “PRODUCTION” since the completion of the English draft. I have not received a formal notification.  1. Apr. 30, 2011: New Submission 2.June 3, 2011: Major Revision 3.June 6, 2011: Revision Submitted.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal seems to be better,

(6) Thank | Anonymous

submission steps are similar to those of other people. Below I will talk about my review to accept.Process:

(5) Thank | Anonymous

At the end of March, I recommended the reviewer, returned two comments, received the revised, July network publication, SCI can be retrieved at the end of September, springer published, feelingAlso

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I am 9.20 direct submitment in English, for a half-month or Awaiting Reviewer Selection, have experienced similar situations?#21031

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The speed is not bad, I also recommended the reviewer, one directly passed, one pointed out a small problem, another problem is more,Finally gave a major repair, 5 days time limit.About 5 days after the rehabilitation, the manuscript will be reviewed and submitted for resignation. The whole period is about 3 months.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Editing is very responsible, and people are very nice.My article lasted 10 months from submission to publication.The review period is longer, and the publication speed is very fast after the appointment.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is almost four months old, or in the external audit.Motivated 2 times No reply!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

submitted on November 12, 2012, about four months later, on March 4, 2013, the review comments were received (post-revised, given 7 days to modify),Revised on March 8th, reviewed English version on March 11th, reverted to English on March 19th, rehabilitated on the morning of March 20th, and received on the afternoon of March 20.The overall progress is slow, but it is content for our civilians.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Technological Sciences Engineering Sciences, is this journal to English review, is it even accepted?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

reviewed for 4 months and was rejected.Telephone consultation on the journal, only 12% of the employment ratio, such as non-heavy extra-large results, Shentou

(0) Thank | Anonymous

selectd for both, and the first-instance cycle of the two is more than a month.The external audit entered on the same day or the next day.The first overhaul, the second trial took another month; the second minor repair, there is no second trial.After this step is completed, the English draft will be reviewed, about a week later, and then you will be sure that they will modify the English and further modify it according to their format. After this return, it will be finalized after about ten days. The status is production.Medium, ie production.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

9 Submitted on the 21st, and returned to the revised opinion on October 15th (small repair), originally only gave 7 days to modify the time, temporarily something else, and applied to the editor to extend the modification time, 10Return to the revised draft on the 31st.On November 7th, I returned to modify some formats, returned to the revised draft at noon on November 8, and received a notice of acceptance at 4 pm.Generally speaking, the submission is relatively smooth and the speed is relatively fast. It is a good journal.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

My is a manuscript submitted on June 29th, recommended three reviewers, and the external audit on the same day; August 1st, received review comments, overhaul, deadline 15Tian Xiu back.There are language aspects, but also content, but fortunately, it is not particularly difficult to answer. On the same day, I will return the revised draft. On August 23, I received a review opinion. This time I mainly talked about the language. I returned the revised draft the next morning and picked it up in the afternoon.To the mail, the notice is acceptd.Overall evaluation: The editor is very responsible and efficient. The reviewers, especially the English reviewers, are particularly careful about the manuscript review. Thanks to the reviewers, their language level has been greatly improved.If you have an interdisciplinary and focused on basic research, you can consider submitting it to the above.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Dear ***,I am very pleased to inform you that your manuscript entitled "***" has now been accepted for publication in SCIENCE CHINA Technological Sciences.Register Number:***Title: ***Author(s): Author list (* for corresponding au

(0) Thank | Anonymous

11 selectd in October, noticed at the end of December! Voted for more than a month, overhauled once, changedAfter that, another month passed, and the editor sent an email saying that it was already accepted. I feel that the reviewer is still very responsible.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Let's change it twice and finally accept it. It feels quite good. I thought it was not SCI, but the core is not at ease!!I am very happy now!!!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Please ask this journalIs it good? Springer published it is generally very difficult. Does this have a tendency for Chinese people?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Springer is published, the speed is relatively fast, three reviewers, feel the editor is veryResponsible, sent to the trial on the same day, I feel that one is sent to the judges recommended by myself. Research focuses on the results and reports, especially as some big projects make progress, what is more acceptable.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.springer.com/engineering/journal/11431

(0) Thank | Anonymous

To original papers!!!!!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I am talking about my situation. I recommended the reviewer, but it should not be the reviewer recommended by me. The draft submitted on March 24th will be reviewed on May 16th.Edit the result, modify it and post it, then go through the process, first modify it according to the editor's opinion, then submit it, soonYou will start to review the English, and then you will be allowed to modify the English manuscript, and then formally accept it in about 1-2 weeks.Our group has issued 3 articles on China Science E so far, which is almost the same progress. The online estimates that the Chinese Science E review is very slow are special cases. I think most of them should be within 3-4.Let's go.The hit rate is my random fill, I am not sure how much this hit rate.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has a low impact factor and requires three reviewers. The difficulty is large. The review period is relatively long, which is mainly determined by the reviewer's response speed.Recommend a reviewer;

(0) Thank | Anonymous