REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT

It took over half a year to write the manuscript and the review comments were returned two and a half months after the submission. Rejected. It was recommended that I resubmit after modification. After four months of revision, I resubmitted and made a peer-to-peer reply to the review comments. The manuscript will be accepted after 3 weeks, and will be published online within 10 days of acceptance. If your research theme is suitable for the journal and your method shows obvious innovation, you will have a better chance with the editors. My review comments were mainly about technical issues, including language expression, literature review, results validation, and model stability. In order to answer the questions of the reviewers, a large number of experiments had to be added, and the structure, charts, etc. of the articles underwent major adjustments. If you have time, energy, and good research results, you can be accepted too!

(7) Thank | Anonymous

中过一篇。现在投不中了，因为换了部分编辑。某个中国编辑从不给我送审，理由是主题与RSE不符，方法不属于遥感方法。同意之前留言，不是编辑圈子的不给送审。改投Bulletin of American Meteorological Society顺利接收。

(0) Thank | friedrichwilhelm@gmail.com

Waiting for review results ah

(1) Thank | Jun_Pro

It's too difficult. I want to have a remote sensing. I want to have a story.

(21) Thank | Xin

It is just around the corner that the Chinese have been arrested.Four or five years ago, who had an RSE was a must, and now there is almost a basic person.

(16) Thank | SWR

Editor-in-chief for another session, the level is getting more and more

(8) Thank | 3ER

Your uncle or your uncle

(1) Thank | RS

contributed on March 6, 2018Delivered to Chinese editors on March 8, 2018Submitted on March 9, 2018May 3, 2018 was rejected, the reason is no new ideasRepresentation was rejected again on May 4, 2018, on the grounds that RSE only received high-level articlesNND, I want to say that there is no new editor to submit for review!!!!

(3) Thank | 一起学猫叫

A few years ago, I selectd for RSE. Now how is it, editorsAre they inflated?

(3) Thank | 佛系

although RSE is the originator of remote sensing, but not in the editorial circle, can'tCast, the probability of reception is too lowUnless the Nature Science level, it is not recommended to select

(7) Thank | 89757

is so slow, I am going to delay it now.It is not recommended for submission, and the editor is the same as S, and does not speak people.

(5) Thank | 白云

5 monthly submission, and returns to the first-instance opinion after three months.There are three reviewers, one directly, one with relatively few opinions (but not good), one with the most comments (including many minor repairs and overhauls), and the editor's comprehensive opinions have been overhauled.The overhaul was still very painful. It was changed for more than three months and returned to the revised draft in November.It was very strange to wait for more than two months, and was informed in February of the following year that it was accepted and published online more than ten days later.As a top publication in the field of remote sensing, it is very powerful, including the review of the paper, the processing of the manuscript by the editorial department, and feedback.At the same time, the comments given by the reviewers are straightforward, and they have to say that their eyes are still very sharp.I hope that more good things can be accepted by RSE in the future.

(1) Thank | RSer

A certain editorial level is limited, but the junior high school students have made a low-level mistake but they don’t dare to admit it. They don’t want to correct it. The right and wrong are turned into a story here, and they will not select again. The editor is a journal for blackening

(7) Thank | 云淡风轻

is particularly disappointed with RSE, especially the female editor Crystal L. Schaaf is particularly unprofessional and terrible, feels no editorial experience, and has a rude attitude, deliberately without the bottom line.I finally waited for review and it was very powerful, but she gave a rejection directly.Angry, she does not respect the time of reviewers and authors at all.Indignantly changed to JGR, and then there will be a few times to accept (minor revison).I wondered how RSE would choose her at the time. It is no wonder that such editors are invincible. It is no wonder that the influence factor of RSE has recently fallen lower than ISPRS and has been overtaken by others.However, the editor of RSE has just been adjusted, and Crystal L. Schaaf and another Chinese editor, Chuanmin Hu, have come down.I hope that the new editorial team will be more serious and responsible, and can be as dedicated as its old editor Marvin Bauer.The authors will be more grateful for their efforts.

(10) Thank | MODIS之梦

just selectd for one rejection, the request is very high, and the reviewer is estimated to be a veteran old man, posing a bunch of references around 1980, which I have seen..

(0) Thank | 1911128870@qq.com

3Submission on the 5th; On April 8th, I returned to the first-instance opinion. The three reviewers fully affirmed the innovation of the article and raised the corresponding questions. The editor gave the Major Revision; 7On March 6th, the change was returned; on August 4, the second-instance opinion returned. All three reviewers believed that the revision of the paper was significantly improved. Two reviewers agreed to publish, and the third reviewer raised a question; AugustThe second revision was returned on the 6th; the paper was accepted on August 16.This is the first paper I read about Bo. I feel that the Remote Sensing of Environment journal is very powerful in the processing of paper review and feedback.

(13) Thank | xinfang@csu.edu.cn

Three reviewers, two suggestions for revision, one proposal for change, the editor gave the opportunity for overhaul, only two review opinions were returned after the revision, and accepted after minor repairs.From submission to receiving online available for a total of 7 months.

(12) Thank | 遥感

RSE,The absolute amnesty of remote sensing journals is the dream of every remote sensing scholar and the goal pursued by some scientific research institutions.The editorial review is very strict, and the manuscripts that are not suitable or have not yet met the requirements will be rejected directly, but will give very reliable advice; the accepted articles need to be reviewed by 3 or more experts, and many reviewers will holdThe attitude of "choosing the bones in the egg" points out the problem of your article. If you don't answer it seriously, any expert gives a negative opinion and your article will be shot.

(8) Thank | 遥感人

IF is currently 4.57, long-term as a TOP1 journal in remote sensing.

(5) Thank | Anonymous

1-2 Reviewing the draft, the efficiency is high; after the second revision, the reviewer also put forward a lot of opinions, but fortunately, after the revision, the editor directly received.

(3) Thank | Anonymous

is very difficult, 3 submissions, 2 editors directly rejected.However, we must continue to work hard to be able to publish the papers on the RSE

(3) Thank | Anonymous

the top journals in the field of remote sensing. It has long been ranked first in the IF ranking of remote sensing journals, which is very difficult.I selectd once, and the review was quick, giving the news about 2 months.Three reviewers, one minor repair, one overhaul, one suggested to change the select, the editor gave the rejection, and suggested to change.Later, this article was submitted to the International Journal of Remote Sensing and was successfully received.My tutor selectd once, reviewed the draft for 3 months, four reviewers, three minor repairs, one suggested a change, and the editor gave a rejection and suggested a change.Later, this article was submitted to IEEE T Geoscience and RS and was successfully received.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

The journal is very difficult, it is the top journal in the remote sensing profession.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

In the field of remote sensing, this journal is still relatively bullish, the industry is more recognized

(0) Thank | Anonymous