Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | PLANT CELL REPORTS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | PLANT CELL REP | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0721-7714 | ||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1432-203X | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 96 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 2.30% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://www.springer.com/journal/299 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/PCRE | ||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | Yes (Hybrid OA journal) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | SPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10013 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Biology | ||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | GERMANY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Monthly | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1981 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 121 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0721-7714%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 3.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 33.33% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on PLANT CELL REPORTS: | Write a review |
Author: Doctor-Smith Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-03-02 20:33:45 I have followed this journal before, and it seems to be known for its speed and responsible attitude of the editors after online review, but there are no details of submissions in the past 2 years. 2018.12.22 I submitted the manuscript; 2018.12.23 I revised the format, added Key Message and statement of contribution and conflict of interest. Because it was during the Christmas holidays, I didn’t expect that the responsible editor replied in time; 2019.01.02 Under review; 2019.01.19 Still under review, time was changed; 2019.02.07 The editors of the journal re-invited the reviewers. I didn’t know the reason. I guessed it maybe that one of the reviewers did not response to the comments within the specified time, or the opinions of the two reviewers were inconsistent. 2019.02.08 The status returned to under review. It only took 1 day to invite reviewers; 2019.02.26 Still under review, the time was changed again to now. I am counting on this article can catch up with the graduation in June, but maybe there’s no hope, and I don't dare to hasten by email. The information queried on MedSci and Xiaomuchong said that the review speed is fast, and the results are usually published in one month. Maybe it depends on editors and reviewers. Keep waiting… ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-08-07 08:51:00 This journal is very fast. Generally, the external review begins one week later. My two submissions were completed in 2 weeks. The total time is no more than 4 weeks. The journal requirements are not very high. ![]() ![]() |
Author: shuicaonianhua Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-08-08 16:12:11 Returning speed after reviewing and modifying is very fast, from submitteding to modification to receiving less than 2 and a half months, the editor is very responsible ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-06-25 08:47:00 This publication is really good, very fast and efficient.It took less than 3 months to submit the draft to the revised acceptance! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-03-13 21:46:00 This journal is the most junk journal, and the review is very slow!!!! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-08-18 22:04:00 Journal Homepage URL: http://www.springer.com/life+sciences/cell+biology/journal/299 ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: 农杆菌转化 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-07-18 15:21:00 PCR I was most impressed by the speed of review.One of the features of the journal is that the article has a dedicated editor, and each published article will be noted as being influenced by-- which editor is responsible. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |