PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT

This journal’s EIC is very responsible. The entire process was 31 days. The reviewers were very professional, but the requirements may be easier than PP. In addition, refusing and encouraging re-submission is similar to other journals.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Two months from the time of submission to receiving a share, the review comments will be returned one month after the submission.No need to make up the test, just raised a lot of questions, asking 28 days to answer all the questions.On the 27th afternoon, the comments were returned, and the article was accepted three days later.Overall, the review time is relatively short.Finally, I wish the research dogs a smooth experiment and graduate soon!!!

(0) Thank | calvo

The submission process was very difficult. After two "rejection re-submissions" and one "small repair", it was finally accepted.As far as I know, this journal does not have the option of "overhaul". It may have been there before, but I learned in the email from the assistant editor that there is no option for overhaul.Every review is actually very fast, with an average of 1-2 months, but it has been delayed for a long time because of the change of the tutor every time, so it will be accepted from September 2017 and will be accepted in August 2018.It has been going through a whole year.

(2) Thank | 253860142@qq.com

First refused to make a heavy shot, and then accepted it after 1 major overhaul.Very good journal, fortunate to be able to get one.

(20) Thank | 1093476429@qq.com

refuses to make a heavy shot first, and then accepts it after 1 overhaul and 1 minor repair.Very good journal, fortunate to be able to get one.

(11) Thank | 1093476429@qq.com

2Submission No.9, February 13th under reivew, March 6th pending recommendation, March 7th under review, the current result is unknown.

(0) Thank | bioxf

has been submitted for more than two months, and is still under review... A little nervous, check the status every day, I hope there is good news.I have submited in an article in 15 years and received it in less than a month.

(3) Thank | 小蜻蜓

1 month later minor revision, one-week re-submitment, accepted in 3 days.

(3) Thank | hali

more than a month, still under review, so slow!

(0) Thank | hali

Get review comments within three months.Published online for four months.The review cycle is fast.The review comments are very professional.I am Lin Xuekou.I feel that the article in this forest model is worthy of the journal of Lin Xuekou.So I chose this.The evaluations of the two reviewers obtained were all very positive.But a reviewer said that your model has never been published in this journal.The editor said that the forest model article we also sent, such as a certain model is the first to be sent here.Received after minor repairs.After a few years, I checked the current citation rate, and my article was probably the second lowest in that period.There is no way, after all, what is done is more partial.I also worked as their reviewer.It is required to complete the review in three months.

(2) Thank | EP

was submitted on December 3, 2016, and the revised opinion was received on January 8, 2017. The change was returned on February 19 and accepted on February 24.Very fast journal

(2) Thank | 小蛤蜊

3月13#SubmissionMarch 14 under reviewMay 5th pending recommendationMay 22, send a letter to the editorPending decision on May 24 and received the result:A reviewer said that the experiment was done very well, the article was written very systematically, and it was suggested that the minor was accepted; one reviewer said that the experiment was done well, but the new idea did not meet the journal standard; the associate edtior agreed to the second review.The commentary of the manuscript, the editor-in-chief finally rejected the manuscript and did not encourage re-submitment.

(2) Thank | xxxx

After the external audit result came back, the pending recommendation was 15 days, and the status remained unchanged.Does anyone know what is going on?

(0) Thank | 823532524@qq.com

8 weeks of external trial, pending recommendation There is still no result in this week, this rhythm...

(0) Thank | 000

said that this journal is fast, one month to the news, the next day the submission is under review, but after six weeks, there is still no first-instance result, there is a classmate who knows, this is an embarrassing situation.?

(0) Thank | xxxx

The review speed is very fast, and the message was given in January

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This review is very slow, submitted eight months ago, and the two rounds of minor repairs accepted.I feel that the editor is very responsible.Under normal circumstances, the review is very fast, probably my direction is relatively small, the reviewer is not easy to find

(0) Thank | Anonymous

review speed is very fast, editing services are efficient, can be rejected

(0) Thank | Anonymous

, the review comments will be given about one month after the submission, and will be received the next day after the minor repair.You can check the various status of the article online, the review efficiency is very high, the result is given after one month, there is no layout fee, but the color map fee.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

First month of trial, received two days after the minor repair, the efficiency is quite high.Before entering the judging stage, the editor will first check the review to see if it is suitable for publication in the publication.One of my brother's articles was rejected three or four days after the select, and did not enter the judging stage.If you enter the review stage, the editor is optimistic about your article.The reviewer should recommend it himself and find a counterpart who compares the cow. Once it is recognized, the success will not be far away. Even if it is not, it will provide revision opinions, which will facilitate the revision of the article.There is no review fee and layout fee for the article, but the color map is charged, the first color map is free, and the second one costs £50 each.I wish you all success.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Plants are relatively unpopular, but the requirements are also very high, now IF5 points more.The range of feelings is relatively narrow, and it is recommended to check on the website to see if it is suitable for the journal.Experience rejection and encourage re-submitment - minor repair - minor repair - finally received.Really feel that it is not easy.Before the review was 6 weeks, after the small repair, the second day of the opinion came back quite quickly!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-3040

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Preliminary review is fastThe same day, the next day, the feedback will be sent back to the author in the next day, which is suitable for publication in this publication.The threshold is a bit high.

(0) Thank | Anonymous