X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

PHYSICS LETTERS A

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[PHYSICS LETTERS A]Hello, you are Visitor Number 74463 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePHYSICS LETTERS A
Journal Title AbbreviationsPHYS LETT A
ISSN0375-9601
h-index159
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
3.600.5130.864
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: General Physics and Astronomy
Q267 / 224

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)6.10%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505705/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/PHYLA
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaPhysics
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencyWeekly
Year Publication Started1967
Annual Article Volume619
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0375-9601%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.8 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Data from Elsevier: 30%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 4.1 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PHYSICS LETTERS A】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on PHYSICS LETTERS A: Write a review
Author: pla12345


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-30 03:56:54
Submitting a manuscript must now write a 6 words highlights.Is it a little difficult for people to oh
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | pla12345

Author: WT323@mail.nwpu.edu.cn


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-12-03 10:58:10
contribution about 2 days under review, review 52 days first trial, looks likeMinor repair, repaired after a week, the same day about one hour with editor, the day after the day directly accepted.Still very fast, I hope to hurry online, hurry up SCI search
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | WT323@mail.nwpu.edu.cn

Author: samurai


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-10-10 15:48:30
I feel that the editor is very responsible. The judges give a lot of suggestions and apply it according to the reviewer's suggestion.The editorial department gave a lot of small changes to the grammar, and felt very responsible.From submission to recruitment, it takes 2 months.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | samurai

Author: letpub12345


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-07-20 15:17:08
Qilian selectd 11 times and all were rejected.Old petitioners.
Show Review in Original Language
(19) Thank | letpub12345

Author: letpub12345


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-07-20 15:16:42
俺11 was selectd 11 times, all of them wereRefused.Old petitioners.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | letpub12345

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-25 19:22:00
has a technical review, so it is best to check and modify it carefully before submitting the manuscript, in strict accordance with the format of the submission requirements, otherwise it will delay the time.I was because the first technical review was not over, and then I carefully changed it for two or three weeks.Looks like a reviewer.The speed is still very fast, the following two or three months can be seen in the following post http://emuch.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=6662936&fpage=1
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-13 15:43:00
The manuscript of the day, now the state is with the editor, I wish you good luck.If you swear, you will be immersed in gold coins.prayer.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-19 09:26:00
This journal reviewer is very serious. The reviewers I met were much more serious than the mentor’s revisions, even punctuation, grammar, etc. Sometimes the language touches were modified.More than 50 times.Often overhauled, minor repairs, and the speed of publication is fast. Sometimes, if the article is not new, the general editor will consume it first, and don’t worry. After a while, it will be rejected. Every time, the copy of the sentence will be given.The innovation is very strong, and the editor feels that he will handle it quickly.One of the most famous journals is Physica D, which concentrates on the manuscripts of many international big cows, so this journal editor is more interesting. If your article is bad, he will spend more than half a year to give you a rejection, so that you never bother them.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-04 23:44:00
I don’t know if it’s bad luck or awkward.This journal is really rubbish. It was submitted on August 28, and it became the editor after September 2, and it is still with editor until today (October 4).I really can't stand it. I wrote a letter on September 28th and I didn't respond to it today.I really want to retract the manuscript, and I first encountered this journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-20 10:09:00
I selectd on September 5th, at the beginning of the state is to joural, then changed to technic in check after two days, then changed to with editor after a day, then receivedGo to an email and say that my article number has been generated. You can log in to the homepage to check the progress. After two days, the status is changed to under review. A total of 7 days have been reviewed, and it is still relatively fast.I chose the editor to introduce the manuscript in the field from the homepage. At least his research direction should be related to me, or I am afraid to directly pass
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-06 23:42:00
for the second time to submit the PLA.After receiving the minor repair in one and a half months, the revised submission was accepted two days later, and the speed is OK.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-03 12:34:00
really slow, not like the rhythm of letter for half a month, or with editor9yue 5hao submitted for review on October 7th under review according to the statement of the 213 upstairs 2013-10-19: Sometimes if the article is not new, the general editor will consume it first. Don't worry, it will be rejected after a while.... This journal editor is more interesting. If your article is bad, he willIt takes you more than half a year to give you a rejection, so that you will never bother their brother's article is nothing new?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-30 20:35:00
14 Status update to with editor, today is still with the editor on the 30th, I wonder if it is submitted for review, how long will it take?Anxious.....
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-22 13:12:00
After submitting the manuscript, it is quite quick to start reviewing this week. However, it is necessary to see the editors who have encountered the first trial for two months. It is estimated that the editor did not find other reviewers, so there is only one review comment for one week.After more than two revisions, I received the second trial speed for two days.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-11 13:40:00
My is also, with editor
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-01 10:08:00
Why recently selectdAlways with the editor, January 8th so far
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-31 08:19:00
Recently very strange, has not been submitted for review, has been with the editor for more than half a month.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-17 00:36:00
It became with editor on December 25, and has been with editor for more than 20 days. I don’t know how this is so long, it’s really awkward....
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-16 22:01:00
Submitted from January 2, has been with editor for half a month, do not know whether the specific external audit, the status is not updated.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-27 10:42:00
Put a phonon heat transfer, receive it directly in one and a half months!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-07 20:44:00
11 At the end of the year, the speed was relatively fast, and the review comments were fair. After the minor repair, it was accepted, which took about two months.not bad.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-03 17:36:00
It is recommended to list the names of the assigned editors. The following bugs can be submitted for reference.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-17 08:16:00
(1)Invested in 2006, oneThe results of the review will be given around the month, and will be directly acceptd after the minor repair.(2) In 2010, I selectd for one. Because there was no innovation and tragedy as a result of the work, I personally felt that the article was very general and could accept this result.(3) The manuscripts submitted around Christmas 2011, so delayed for a long time (can understand, foreign holidays), in 2012 to give revisions, 2 reviewers, modified after uploading the second day was edited, the speed is veryfast.Summary: The speed is faster, our group can reach the revised opinion as soon as it can reach about 20 days, and it will be accepted after a few days. The editor is very responsible, and the reviewers are all cattle.Small shortcomings: There is a technical review after submission, which is also to improve the quality of the journal, so be sure to check the article before submitting it.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-13 12:13:00
Physics Letters A, has been with editor, changed the date in the middle, what does it mean?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-29 10:29:00
once selectd for one article, was shackled two months later, said that it is not enough innovation, after submiting in physcia script, has just selectd for an article, I hope good luck!The format requirements are more formal, and the height is very fast!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [PHYSICS LETTERS A]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service