X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 136943 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Journal Title AbbreviationsPHYS REV LETT
ISSN0031-9007
E-ISSN1079-7114
h-index567
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
15.603.5882.370
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: General Physics and Astronomy
Q110 / 224

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)8.60%
Official Websitehttp://prl.aps.org/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://authors.aps.org/ESUB/
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER PHYSICAL SOC, ONE PHYSICS ELLIPSE, COLLEGE PK, USA, MD, 20740-3844
Subject AreaPhysics
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyWeekly
Year Publication Started1958
Annual Article Volume2644
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0031-9007%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.1 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 50%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-08-11 09:35:00
PRL After deciding to limit the number of articles in 2009, the receiving rate has dropped. From ~30% to ~20%.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 纳米
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-27 17:08:00
personal feeling PRLThe editor is quite reasonable, and is similar to nature. Sometimes it rejects the manuscript directly, but they actually read your article.Recently, the editors of PRL started to love IF a bit, and personally did not appreciate it.Say a successful experience of the argument.After a total of eight months and three rounds of review, it was finally drafted.Later, I analyzed it and thought that there was still a chance to fight back, so I wrote to DAE, the deputy editor of the division, and DAE received it directly.So everyone must have confidence.With such positive encouragement, send me more gold coins.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-22 11:02:00
PRL is the top journal of the physical class. Since PRL decided to limit the number of articles published, it is more and more difficult to select. Only the significant talents can be submitted up. Otherwise, the editors will be rejected directly.Very serious
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-16 15:15:00
The top journal of physics is the dream of most physics people.The journal takes all directions in physics and its articles are extremely ideological and novel.At the same time, because of its most avant-garde content, some opinions will be commented.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-15 20:33:00
The most cattle journal of physics, now the review is getting more and more strict, the hit is getting harder and harder, and the editor's direct rejection rate is getting higher and higher.Emphasis on the breadth of innovation and readership, while focusing on theory and results.It can be said that the depth of the article above PRL is much deeper than that of Nature Physics, which seems to be more difficult than NP.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service