| Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Title | PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Journal Title Abbreviations | PEST MANAG SCI | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN | 1526-498X | ||||||||||||||||||||
| E-ISSN | 1526-4998 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| h-index | 107 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 11.50% | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Official Website | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1526-4998 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Online Manuscript Submission | http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/pm-wiley | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Publisher | JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD, THE ATRIUM, SOUTHERN GATE, CHICHESTER, ENGLAND, W SUSSEX, PO19 8SQ | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject Area | Agriculture and Forestry | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Country/Area of Publication | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Publication Frequency | Monthly | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Year Publication Started | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Annual Article Volume | 369 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1526-498X%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 2.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: Moderate | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| *All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| |
| First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
| Reviews on PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE: | Write a review |
| Author: Chilo Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-12-25 16:24:58 A TOP journal in the field of entomology, focusing on prevention and control, with slow review speed. Since this journal climbed to Q1, there has been an increase in the number of manuscripts, and the impact factor is also rising steadily.  (1) Thank | Chilo  |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-02-19 11:46:00 This journal’s processing speed seems slow and several of my papers were directly rejected (desk rejections)… (1) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: 1181039407@qq.com Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-04 10:59:31 submitted, with editor Two months, under review for two months, modify, various small problems, modifyAfter returning, with the editor for two months, refused to draft, all kinds of problems, the subject does not meet what.I made glyphosate, this month of rejection, the journal made a special issue about glyphosate. (1) Thank | 1181039407@qq.com |
| Author: 15013006232@163.com Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-08-20 20:15:50 Submitted in mid-April 2017, returned on June 5th, 2 reviewers, one gave more opinions, and the second reviewer wrote the whole articleModifications, from beginning to end, including the table title are modified, very serious, is equivalent to help us to polish the article for free.Then, on July 5th, I will return to receive it directly. On August 18th, I will reply directly to the reception. Due to the second language modification, the journal will be published directly online and will not be minor.Received for less than 4 months in total. (3) Thank | 15013006232@163.com |
| Author: 15013006232@163.com Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-08-20 20:15:44 Submitted in mid-April 2017, returned on June 5th, 2 reviewers, one gave a more extensive opinion, and the second reviewer wrote the whole article on the writing of the paper.Modifications, from beginning to end, including the table title are modified, very serious, is equivalent to help us to polish the article for free.Then, on July 5th, I will return to receive it directly. On August 18th, I will reply directly to the reception. Due to the second language modification, the journal will be published directly online and will not be minor.Received for less than 4 months in total. (0) Thank | 15013006232@163.com |
| Author: fafupuyuchen@163.com Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-07-29 20:08:26 The impact factor is increasing year by year, it is a good journal, and the requirements are stricter. (0) Thank | fafupuyuchen@163.com |
| Author: ZHOULI5850120@163.COM Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-06-16 17:35:13 reviewer's attitudeOk, the impact factor rises to 3.253 (0) Thank | ZHOULI5850120@163.COM |
| Author: ZHOULI5850120@163.COM Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-06-16 17:34:54 Reviewer's attitude is good, the impact factor rises to 3.253 (0) Thank | ZHOULI5850120@163.COM |
| Author: ZHOULI5850120@163.COM Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-06-16 17:33:20 Reviewer's attitude is good (0) Thank | ZHOULI5850120@163.COM |
| Author: zcq@njau.edu.cn Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-08-04 21:19:35 This journal is a district in our academic field. Although the impact factor is not high, it has a high impact.The review speed is average, but the second trial is very fast.The editor is more picky.But if the data or research content is very similar, it is worth trying. (3) Thank | zcq@njau.edu.cn |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-08-17 15:27:00 is a marathon review, submitted in 2009.12, received in 2011.05, officially published in 2012.02, revised three times, and tortured for nearly two years.However, the editor is really good, very patient, and the reviewer is impatient and refuses to submit the manuscript. I don't know if it is luck. (2) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-02-21 22:39:00 The editorial attitude is very nice, and I gave a reply in a month.Overhauled once, also for a month; after a few more minor sentences, I received it for a total of two and a half months.But now I don't know the time of online. It seems to be a long time. It has been two months, and there is no news. (1) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-01-28 15:01:00 The journal reply is very nice, the article I selectd for, it is recommended to overhaul one month after the first trial, and the advice given by the second trial for about 15 days is Xiaoxiu. After 10 days of minor repair, I feel that the speed of reviewing can still beIt was published online 2 months after the acceptance, but it took more than 4 months for the online official release. The overall feeling of reviewing the paper is very fast. The lack of publication is very slow! (1) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-12-18 16:12:00 contributed on November 23, 2011, Under Review on 26th; Awaiting Decision on December 18.It feels a bit fast, and the first-instance cycle is more than a month longer than the last published article (published article). (2) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-12-13 15:40:00 Editing attitude is good, the first trial is not too slow (one month), I don't know how to judge the second trial (1) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-10-15 15:23:00 first trial: my two months reply on time, the comment is fair,A minor repair, a major overhaul, and finally a major overhaul; second trial: two weeks to reply, receive.Publishing may be slower... (1) Thank | Anonymous |
| Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-01-18 17:25:00 The reply is quite gentle, but it is relatively slow, two months, and the first-instance opinion draft (1) Thank | Anonymous |
| First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |