OPTICS EXPRESS

My most recent paper was rejected from this journal, and I disagree with some of the reviewer’s comments. I wrote to the staff noting this. However, the editor quickly replied to the message "I believe there are good reasons why this manuscript is not suitable for Optics Express.” Frustrating. My Conclusion: If you are unfortunately rejected, especially in the OSA journal, unless it is an editorial mistake, no matter how justified your opinion, you are out of luck.

(11) Thank | 匿名人士

Two and a half months of overhaul, the second reviewer asked questions and did not hesitate to reply.The first reviewer considered the theory to be problematic, but his arguments proved to be wrong. We added proofs in both the respond letter and the original text that the errors raised by the first reviewer could be avoided.The result of replying back was that it did not meet the requirements of reviewer and refused to submit.Editors recommend switching to AO or their new OSA journal.

(0) Thank | 翼博

was rejected after about 1 month of review, and then changed to a reviewer after the appeal, and waited for more than a month to overhaulAfter accepting, but the production status has been almost a month, has not been published, do not know the situation.

(0) Thank | Joe_s

oe status: productionThere is a temporary delay in publication. There is no news for 2 months. Is there any state like me?Thank you

(0) Thank | 与可

After all, it is a journal with a face-to-face fee, and the service is very good.It may be that the annual demand is large, and the quality of the article is generally high, and it is getting more and more water.

(12) Thank | YYAA

The first time to send an article, the journal reviewer is very professional, pointed out a lot of mistakes.The process was difficult and it took two revisions to finalize the reception, which lasted three months.I wish the journals better and better.

(2) Thank | tieger

Although there are many articles about the Chinese people in OE, it shows that OE is very important in the hearts of Chinese people.As a classic journal in the field of optics, the review manuscript is highly efficient, the editor is responsible and the review comments are also rigorous.The articles published not only need to be innovative but also require system integrity.Keeping up with OL and being able to post articles on it is worthy of recognition.

(1) Thank | TSU

1 month back, overhaulSubmitted after 10 days, 2 hours receptionSee more than one month laterIn general, the requirements for innovation are high and the content needs to be perfect.Responding to the reviewers' opinions requires detailed refinement, don't be lazy, and respond carefully.

(12) Thank | Anonymous

This is the fourth article published on OE. It is also a reviewer. To tell the truth, from my own experience, I really feel that the journal is not very good!Every time I have more than 3 reviewers, the question is really not very good!Of course, this is also a way for OE to guarantee the quality of the paper.Summarized as follows:1. Compared with JLT and PTL, reviewing and editing, the decision is faster. This has a lot to do with the journal's thoughts and editorial style. For example, OE may soon assign editors.Peer review can be entered very quickly, and the entire process editor is paying attention to progress.2, the paper must be innovative, and requires a certain amount of work.

(34) Thank | 天桥上的人

OA, thousands of articles a year, the Chinese accounted for half.

(8) Thank | JEAN

just two months, from submitted to acceptThis is the only good news in the first half of the year.Three editors, one overhaul, two minor repairs, and the editor gave the overhaul, giving only ten days.Very good journal, the layout fee is slightly more expensive.However, the second district is also very good.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

While demanding innovation, OE has a higher systemic requirement for the article, and the overall quality of the paper is quite good. It is one of the most mainstream journals in laser and optoelectronics..The impact factor is bullish!

(1) Thank | Tra

The layout fee is a little expensive, the recruitment period is longer

(1) Thank | xcshen@aofm.ac.cn

Received a review opinion for one month, it should be a minor repair, and it will be acceptd in an hour or so. I want to say that you don’t take a closer look at the editor. Overall, OEHigh demand for innovation, high level of reviewers

(2) Thank | wangzi@hfut.edu.cn

found 2 reviewers, 1 change comments within 5 days, 1 editor urged 2 comments, 1 overhaul, 1 rejected.The editor gave the rejection.The opinions given by the experts are still very high, and they are ready to change the submitment AO.

(1) Thank | heming

Submitted in October 2017, the editor found 5 reviewers, 3 of which were reviewed by the reviewer and received all after 3 weeks.Review comments, 2 minor repairs, 1 overhaul.It took 25 days to make a careful revision (11 pages of the paper, 30 pages of the reply), and then repaired.After 10 days, I will receive a notice of employment and then enter the proof.I feel that the reviewer is very professional and has a level.At least the articles in the peer field OE are still very innovative.

(10) Thank | wuxingBIT

1 months after the minor repair directly acceptd, very good open source journals, the quality of manuscripts is uneven.Better than some entry-level journals, although there is no need for innovation in the overall article.Now the Chinese manuscripts account for nearly 50%, and some are scary.

(4) Thank | sun

listen wellFor beginners, it is very expensive, spend more money

(2) Thank | s de

listen to the good, suitable for beginners, is very expensive, spend more money

(3) Thank | s de

The first submission, one reviewer suggested minor repairs, and another reviewer believed that there were several major flaws and was rejected.After detailed revision according to the reviewer's comments, re-submit and attach a response.The second editor contacted four or five reviewers. After two months, only one gave the review comments, minor repairs, and received them directly after the revision.Counting the first submission, the cycle is three and a half months.Some experiences:1. OE has only two options, reject and provisionally accept.So even if reject can modify the re-submitment, it can be treated as a major overhaul of other journals;2. OE's requirements for innovation are not particularly high, but they are very important for the rationality of the article model (not necessarily universal, at least in optical communication).3. I don't know if anyone has used overleaf to compile the latex file online. The compiled zip will be uploaded to the OE submission system and there will be problems.Before submitting a manuscript, you must check it carefully. After all, typography and language are the facades of the article. Small problems in these areas will cause big losses, giving the reviewers a bad impression of being preconceived.

(7) Thank | wyl1993@163.com

The first submission, one reviewer suggested minor repairs, and another reviewer believed that there were several major flaws and was rejected.After detailed revision according to the reviewer's comments, re-submit and attach a response.The second editor contacted four or five reviewers. After two months, only one gave the review comments, minor repairs, and received them directly after the revision.Counting the first submission, the cycle is three and a half months.Some experiences:1. OE has only two options, reject and provisionally accept.So even if reject can modify the re-submitment, it can be treated as a major overhaul of other journals;2. OE is not particularly demanding for innovation, but it pays attention to the rationality of the article model.3. I don't know if anyone has used overleaf to compile the latex file online. The compiled zip will be uploaded to the OE submission system and there will be problems.Before submitting a manuscript, you must check it carefully. After all, typography and language are the facades of the article. Small problems in these areas will cause big losses, giving the reviewers a bad impression of being preconceived.

(2) Thank | wyl1993@163.com

4, selectd for 26 times, changed once, directly accepted after modification, June 8th, I am very happy that the first article can be accepted.

(11) Thank | fan6398@163.com

Soon.AE people are very good.The reviewer has a high evaluation of the work, and the AE receives it directly, and receives it after modifying the format twice.I heard that the OE submission system has changed, only the provisional acceptance and resubmission.It should be for the review process to be faster.

(1) Thank | 你猜我是哪只喵

has been rejected and not comprehensive.After the revision, it was rejected. The reason for the rejection was still very bad.

(4) Thank | 1072353554@qq.com

has been acceptd~~ but I don't know how to pay the layout fee

(0) Thank | maoshan8633@sina.com