My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

OPTICS EXPRESS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[OPTICS EXPRESS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 186143 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleOPTICS EXPRESS
Journal Title AbbreviationsOPT EXPRESS
ISSN1094-4087
h-index240
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
6.701.5331.651
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
Q126 / 183

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)16.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/home.cfm
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://account.osa.org/home.aspx?topredirect=1&url_success=http://www.opticsinfobase.org%2Foe%2Fadsonline%2Fdefault%2Ecfm%3Fevent%3Dauthor%2Estart%26r
Open AccessYes
PublisherOPTICAL SOC AMER, 2010 MASSACHUSETTS AVE NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20036
Subject AreaPhysics
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1997
Annual Article Volume3303
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1094-4087%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.2 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 50%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【OPTICS EXPRESS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)
  Reviews on OPTICS EXPRESS: Write a review
Author: 匿名人士


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-18 07:20:19
My most recent paper was rejected from this journal, and I disagree with some of the reviewer’s comments. I wrote to the staff noting this. However, the editor quickly replied to the message "I believe there are good reasons why this manuscript is not suitable for Optics Express.” Frustrating. My Conclusion: If you are unfortunately rejected, especially in the OSA journal, unless it is an editorial mistake, no matter how justified your opinion, you are out of luck.

(11) Thank | 匿名人士

Author: 翼博


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-29 10:18:42
Two and a half months of overhaul, the second reviewer asked questions and did not hesitate to reply.The first reviewer considered the theory to be problematic, but his arguments proved to be wrong. We added proofs in both the respond letter and the original text that the errors raised by the first reviewer could be avoided.The result of replying back was that it did not meet the requirements of reviewer and refused to submit.Editors recommend switching to AO or their new OSA journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 翼博

Author: Joe_s


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-17 10:42:45
was rejected after about 1 month of review, and then changed to a reviewer after the appeal, and waited for more than a month to overhaulAfter accepting, but the production status has been almost a month, has not been published, do not know the situation.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Joe_s

Author: 与可


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-15 11:45:26
oe status: productionThere is a temporary delay in publication. There is no news for 2 months. Is there any state like me?Thank you
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 与可

Author: YYAA


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-19 14:48:43
After all, it is a journal with a face-to-face fee, and the service is very good.It may be that the annual demand is large, and the quality of the article is generally high, and it is getting more and more water.
Show Review in Original Language
(12) Thank | YYAA

Author: tieger


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-25 10:18:35
The first time to send an article, the journal reviewer is very professional, pointed out a lot of mistakes.The process was difficult and it took two revisions to finalize the reception, which lasted three months.I wish the journals better and better.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | tieger

Author: TSU


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-03 20:42:45
Although there are many articles about the Chinese people in OE, it shows that OE is very important in the hearts of Chinese people.As a classic journal in the field of optics, the review manuscript is highly efficient, the editor is responsible and the review comments are also rigorous.The articles published not only need to be innovative but also require system integrity.Keeping up with OL and being able to post articles on it is worthy of recognition.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | TSU

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-01 22:42:02
1 month back, overhaulSubmitted after 10 days, 2 hours receptionSee more than one month laterIn general, the requirements for innovation are high and the content needs to be perfect.Responding to the reviewers' opinions requires detailed refinement, don't be lazy, and respond carefully.
Show Review in Original Language
(12) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 天桥上的人


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-14 06:32:18
This is the fourth article published on OE. It is also a reviewer. To tell the truth, from my own experience, I really feel that the journal is not very good!Every time I have more than 3 reviewers, the question is really not very good!Of course, this is also a way for OE to guarantee the quality of the paper.Summarized as follows:1. Compared with JLT and PTL, reviewing and editing, the decision is faster. This has a lot to do with the journal's thoughts and editorial style. For example, OE may soon assign editors.Peer review can be entered very quickly, and the entire process editor is paying attention to progress.2, the paper must be innovative, and requires a certain amount of work.
Show Review in Original Language
(34) Thank | 天桥上的人

Author: JEAN


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-17 21:08:21
OA, thousands of articles a year, the Chinese accounted for half.
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | JEAN

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-28 09:05:12
just two months, from submitted to acceptThis is the only good news in the first half of the year.Three editors, one overhaul, two minor repairs, and the editor gave the overhaul, giving only ten days.Very good journal, the layout fee is slightly more expensive.However, the second district is also very good.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Tra


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-27 07:30:31
While demanding innovation, OE has a higher systemic requirement for the article, and the overall quality of the paper is quite good. It is one of the most mainstream journals in laser and optoelectronics..The impact factor is bullish!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Tra

Author: xcshen@aofm.ac.cn


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-11 10:47:50
The layout fee is a little expensive, the recruitment period is longer
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | xcshen@aofm.ac.cn

Author: wangzi@hfut.edu.cn


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-04 08:27:25
Received a review opinion for one month, it should be a minor repair, and it will be acceptd in an hour or so. I want to say that you don’t take a closer look at the editor. Overall, OEHigh demand for innovation, high level of reviewers
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | wangzi@hfut.edu.cn

Author: heming


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-22 15:01:34
found 2 reviewers, 1 change comments within 5 days, 1 editor urged 2 comments, 1 overhaul, 1 rejected.The editor gave the rejection.The opinions given by the experts are still very high, and they are ready to change the submitment AO.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | heming

Author: wuxingBIT


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-16 21:23:37
Submitted in October 2017, the editor found 5 reviewers, 3 of which were reviewed by the reviewer and received all after 3 weeks.Review comments, 2 minor repairs, 1 overhaul.It took 25 days to make a careful revision (11 pages of the paper, 30 pages of the reply), and then repaired.After 10 days, I will receive a notice of employment and then enter the proof.I feel that the reviewer is very professional and has a level.At least the articles in the peer field OE are still very innovative.
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | wuxingBIT

Author: sun


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-22 12:17:38
1 months after the minor repair directly acceptd, very good open source journals, the quality of manuscripts is uneven.Better than some entry-level journals, although there is no need for innovation in the overall article.Now the Chinese manuscripts account for nearly 50%, and some are scary.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | sun

Author: s de


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-15 08:24:04
listen wellFor beginners, it is very expensive, spend more money
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | s de

Author: s de


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-15 08:23:59
listen to the good, suitable for beginners, is very expensive, spend more money
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | s de

Author: wyl1993@163.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-17 20:57:13
The first submission, one reviewer suggested minor repairs, and another reviewer believed that there were several major flaws and was rejected.After detailed revision according to the reviewer's comments, re-submit and attach a response.The second editor contacted four or five reviewers. After two months, only one gave the review comments, minor repairs, and received them directly after the revision.Counting the first submission, the cycle is three and a half months.Some experiences:1. OE has only two options, reject and provisionally accept.So even if reject can modify the re-submitment, it can be treated as a major overhaul of other journals;2. OE's requirements for innovation are not particularly high, but they are very important for the rationality of the article model (not necessarily universal, at least in optical communication).3. I don't know if anyone has used overleaf to compile the latex file online. The compiled zip will be uploaded to the OE submission system and there will be problems.Before submitting a manuscript, you must check it carefully. After all, typography and language are the facades of the article. Small problems in these areas will cause big losses, giving the reviewers a bad impression of being preconceived.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | wyl1993@163.com

Author: wyl1993@163.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-17 20:55:50
The first submission, one reviewer suggested minor repairs, and another reviewer believed that there were several major flaws and was rejected.After detailed revision according to the reviewer's comments, re-submit and attach a response.The second editor contacted four or five reviewers. After two months, only one gave the review comments, minor repairs, and received them directly after the revision.Counting the first submission, the cycle is three and a half months.Some experiences:1. OE has only two options, reject and provisionally accept.So even if reject can modify the re-submitment, it can be treated as a major overhaul of other journals;2. OE is not particularly demanding for innovation, but it pays attention to the rationality of the article model.3. I don't know if anyone has used overleaf to compile the latex file online. The compiled zip will be uploaded to the OE submission system and there will be problems.Before submitting a manuscript, you must check it carefully. After all, typography and language are the facades of the article. Small problems in these areas will cause big losses, giving the reviewers a bad impression of being preconceived.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | wyl1993@163.com

Author: fan6398@163.com


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-08 08:41:38
4, selectd for 26 times, changed once, directly accepted after modification, June 8th, I am very happy that the first article can be accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | fan6398@163.com

Author: 你猜我是哪只喵


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-06 23:35:07
Soon.AE people are very good.The reviewer has a high evaluation of the work, and the AE receives it directly, and receives it after modifying the format twice.I heard that the OE submission system has changed, only the provisional acceptance and resubmission.It should be for the review process to be faster.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 你猜我是哪只喵

Author: 1072353554@qq.com


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-06 12:43:14
has been rejected and not comprehensive.After the revision, it was rejected. The reason for the rejection was still very bad.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 1072353554@qq.com

Author: maoshan8633@sina.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-23 10:31:07
has been acceptd~~ but I don't know how to pay the layout fee
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | maoshan8633@sina.com

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)

Start your review of [OPTICS EXPRESS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service