OPTICS COMMUNICATIONS

Content: fiber optic and light source. Here’s the timeline. Submission on 2019.01.25. Sent for review on 2019.02.05. First review comments received on 2019.03.07. Major revision was required and there was 1 reviewer with 4 questions, which were not difficult to answer. Revised submission on 2019.03.13. The format had some problems and it was sent back. With editor on 2019.03.18. Second review comments received on 2019.04.08. Accepted. Other notes: OC number is: **-###, ** is the abbreviation of the editor's name, and ### is the number. Because the article was required for the purpose of graduation, we urged the editors for the first review and the second review of the manuscript. They were very responsible, and returned the review comments quickly in these two times.

(2) Thank | pwu9

This journal can be tough if you are not a native English speaker; my writing is typically pretty good and it was still tough for me to get a paper accepted.

(6) Thank | lql

It’s been more than a month, it’s always under review, I don’t know what it means.

(0) Thank | cy232123

Get the review results in about 2 and a half months, update the review status twice, and edit the reply is still very fast.The article was received after minor repairs, quite good.

(0) Thank | Arkstephen

Other students in the lab contributed very quickly, and the results were more than a month.I have been in this trial for 3 months, and the second trial is another month. Fortunately, I finally acceptd it.

(0) Thank | orca

An article about lasers.Submitted at the end of October, received review comments after two weeks, minor repairs.Give one month to modify the time, use one week to modify the reply and then accept it one week.The speed is very fast, and the editors and reviewers are very responsible and have some good comments.

(0) Thank | 逸潇

The speed is very fast, but it has been rejected. I feel that one of the contents can be sent EI. When I combine the whole system relationship, the reviewer will know the result at a glance., Halo, maybe I didn't highlight my method, the process is too brief, maybe I share the analysis results too much, or the reviewer is a big cow, in short, very sad, full of hope, the result is poured a cold water, the heartCool and transparent

(2) Thank | 毛毛虫

Will the oc in the under review status be submitted for review?

(2) Thank | xiaolinzi

2018.6.19 selectd over, 7.25 notice accept, 7.27onlinethe speed is very fast!awesome!Xiao Shuoyan made the first submission, felt the goodwill of the editors and reviewers, and continued to work on the second!

(5) Thank | 1362151657@qq.com

Do you have a OC word template for submission?How can I find it?!!

(3) Thank | 785487973@qq.com

2018.04.30Submission, 2018.05.21 Received, replied to several questions of reviewers, provided high-resolution pictures of the paper, published in 2011.06.26, very good submission experience.

(0) Thank | 科研小生

is really awesome. 4.28 submissions 5.3 or so will return to 5.17 return revision 5.18accept This speed is faster than letterer

(2) Thank | 北邮小只

praised Professor Qiu Yu, from submission to revision to recruitment for a total of 25 days, the efficiency is very high, the fifth article of the doctor's first grade, can be properly graduated.

(8) Thank | jhzr

oc prefers to have innovative things, and requires experimental completeness, its review speed is relatively fast, and online publishing is also very fast

(1) Thank | optical204

oc Journal is a veteran journal in the field of optical communication, and its reputation is still good.The reviewer is still very good in professionalism and can recommend reviewers.It is also timely to edit and process the manuscript. It will not be delayed for a week. The speed of review is determined by the reviewer.The journal looks at the completeness of theory and experiment. As long as there is innovation, there is a great opportunity. Thank you for your first journal after graduation.

(13) Thank | wxx

The review is very fast, and the reviewer is professional, 10.25 submission, 11.28 first review comments, received in January, very few!

(0) Thank | Mr Huang

min qiu Professor is very efficient, responsible, praise one!

(7) Thank | vigour2

has been used for 1 month from the initial review result. The opinion is not bad.Modifications were made for another week, and the editor Lawrence Chen was extremely efficient and the manuscript was processed in one day.After receiving a notice of employment a week later, the first SCI was quite exciting.

(0) Thank | chen

The review speed is very fast, from submission to recruitment less than three months, the reviewer gave very good advice, directly after the overhaul, edited by Professor Min Qiu veryresponsibly handle.thank.

(4) Thank | 景泓紫瑞

Two months, no news

(400) Thank | 1111

Submitted Sep 19, 2017, Accepted Sep 30, 2017.Editing Lawrence R Chen is so fast that every manuscript is processed in one day.The reviewer's speed is also amazing. The review is completed in 4 days, and the two comments are minorly revised. The modification will be received directly within half a day.Submitted to receive but received 12 days!!During the revision period, it was delayed for a few days because of something, otherwise it will be received within ten days.Especially like and admire efficient people!I wish you all the best!

(4) Thank | hahahha

The first trial was 40 days. The reviewer gave more than a dozen suggestions, demanding overhaul, changing for two weeks, and accepting the second trial for ten days. It feels very fast, and the reviewer’s suggestions are alsoVery pertinent, very helpful for the modification, in general, a good journal in the industry reputation

(1) Thank | jay

Photonic crystal fiber sensor design, one month later, comments, four reviewers 15 comments, one suggestion to receive directly, one suggested overhaul, the editor gave overhaul, changed for a week, responseTo the comments wrote nearly 4,000 words, received after ten days.

(0) Thank | 木木

The reviewer recommended by himself is a reviewer. The direction should not be exactly the same, so there is no problem.

(0) Thank | 353393934@qq.com

This journal still has certain requirements for the thesis, and it has certain innovation. The editor did not submit the trial and rejected the draft directly.

(0) Thank | cc