X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 60646 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleNEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
Journal Title AbbreviationsNEW J PHYS
ISSN1367-2630
h-index142
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
6.801.7341.089
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: General Physics and Astronomy
Q123 / 224

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)7.00%
Official Websitehttp://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc04.manuscriptcentral.com/njp
Open AccessYes
PublisherIOP PUBLISHING LTD, DIRAC HOUSE, TEMPLE BACK, BRISTOL, ENGLAND, BS1 6BE
Subject AreaPhysics
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyIrregular
Year Publication Started1998
Annual Article Volume626
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1367-2630%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 37.5%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS: Write a review
Author: Handsomesix


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-01-10 20:56:52
This is the best work during the PhD. Because it’s impossible to be accepted by PRL as there is no experiment, I tried submitting to NJP. Both reviewers are small peers and understand it very well. It is recommended to accept with very small changes. It is estimated that the editorial office is very careful, and it should be with editor for at least 2 weeks till a minor revision was required. But there was one Indian, who was very disgusting and asked us to cite two articles of Indian. I even don't know what journal it is. According to the reviewer's request, it was revised for 1 hour. After resubmitted, it was accepted. But the publication process is a bit slow. One month has passed and it has not been published yet.

(5) Thank | Handsomesix

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-17 14:36:00
I have an article that was accepted to this journal. The two reviewers were professional and helpful. They made my article better in significant ways. The reviewers’ review speed was relatively fast. This is an open source journal with an impact factor of about 3.8 and a layout fee of more than 6,000 RMB.

(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 小二哥


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-09 08:02:01
Submitted on September 26th, then the two reviewers gave the revised comments, the editor felt that there was nothing new, and the revised draft was submitted on November 26, December 5, twoThe reviewers all felt that the questions were answered, and the editors did not say anything. They passed it directly. Personally, the reviewers’ suggestions were very insightful and professional. They should carefully answer the suggestions from the reviewers. The new ideas must beThere are two or three points.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 小二哥

Author: 59845


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-04-23 10:42:12
The editor of this journal is very special. It is normal to submit a letter of rejection for a ten-and-a-half-month period.The journal has a rate of 80%, and it is best not to select for this journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 59845

Author: nn


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-28 15:05:33
was invited to write a manuscript, the article could have selectd for a better journal, but the potential of njp was fancy, so he selectd.The speed is very fast, I hope njp is getting better and better!
Show Review in Original Language
(256) Thank | nn

Author: runningwater


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-12-11 12:26:51
The journal refused to review and mainstream, especially academic papers with different views from members of the editorial board.Really innovative papers are hard to publish in this journal unless you have a relationship.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | runningwater

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-25 20:07:00
article was selectd back from the PRL rejection, and then turned to njp.The two reviewers, who disagreed, found a senior judge and then gave them a chance to overhaul.It has been accepted.I have selectd many times before and basically did not submit for trial.The theory of this article is relatively deep, and prl is also submitted for review.It is not difficult to lose the PRB.Definitely higher than apl.Requirements theory depth
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-15 19:46:00
Open Access Journal,Recently, the impact factor has risen very fast, and it should be the best journal of the current IOP.The impact is slightly less than the PR series.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-06 23:22:00
This journal of physical synthesis is getting more and more attention from international authorities, and the impact factor has also reached a new level.A European physicist said that the journal is very good.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-30 13:34:00
NJP2011 impact factor breakthrough 4, 4.117
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service