X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

NEUROSCIENCE

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[NEUROSCIENCE]Hello, you are Visitor Number 31044 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleNEUROSCIENCE
Journal Title AbbreviationsNEUROSCIENCE
ISSN0306-4522
E-ISSN1873-7544
h-index204
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
6.001.3640.961
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Neuroscience
Subcategory: General Neuroscience
Q234 / 111

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)3.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.journals.elsevier.com/neuroscience/#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/NSC
Open AccessNo
PublisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaMedicine
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1976
Annual Article Volume593
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0306-4522%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 50%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【NEUROSCIENCE】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on NEUROSCIENCE: Write a review
Author: vitaszzshine


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-02-23 22:13:12
I don’t know why my submission this time is not as efficient as the previous people said. It may be mainly because reviewers are harder to find. It took 1–2 months to find reviewers. After waiting for another two months, the review comments were received. There was no major problem. It took a week to process the review opinions. And then it took nearly two months after resubmission. If you are anxious to publish a paper for graduation, you may need to be cautious. If the direction is relatively biased, it may be difficult to find reviewers; of course, if the quality of your work is relatively good, you can have a try.

(1) Thank | vitaszzshine

Author: 被科研吊打的医学狗


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-12-08 19:31:05
Slowly, slowly, and slowly. No editor had been invited for two weeks. After sending a reminder letter, the manuscript was under review. Then there was no news for more than a month. Then I sent a reminder letter again. He said that he can’t find the corresponding reviewer. He added that he found the second reviewer for whose reply he was waiting for. Again, he said that he was still looking for reviewers now. I was speechless that it has been three months. He withdrew the manuscript without a result three months later. I am really speechless. Wasted me three months.

(1) Thank | 被科研吊打的医学狗

Author: 小雪雪


Subject Area: Medicine
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-07-08 09:10:41
The efficiency of this journal is relatively high. The response of first submission was given in a month, with comments from two reviewers. The first one pointed out a lot of problems, including language issues, and the second one raised relatively few problems. The time given for revision is 2 months, and then the experiment is completed and the language was modified. After the resubmission, the response was given again one month later. The time given for revision is still 2 months. This time the first reviewer had basically no comments, but was very careful, and helped to revise it word by word. The second person pointed out a lot of problems. The editor of the journal said that this was the last chance, and then we revised it carefully. Thanks to LetPub's help, whose editor was still very responsible. I asked them to fix it for me several times, and finally returned the article within the time required. This time they gave response very soon, saying that there was no problem any more. In fact, it is much better to polish the language first, and in this way, others can read it clearly. It is more convincing to indicate who helped polishing the language when it had been polished.

(0) Thank | 小雪雪

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-13 10:06:00
The research focuses on neurodegenerative diseases, neurodevelopment, and drug treatment. The review time is about one month. And the reception rate is about 50%. Although the impact factor is not very high, it is still a good old-fashioned journal. If the work is okay, there are some innovations, and the data is detailed and full, it is not difficult to get published!

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 1183917977@qq.com


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-13 12:16:45
The article was retired after one month of trial, and it was revised for 2 months. It took one and a half months to repair the article and gave it to the second after 20 days.After revising the comments, I gave it another two months. I took the article back in 10 days and received it directly after three days. The review of the journal was very efficient. The reviewers’ comments were very pertinent. The editor of the journal wrote the article.The requirements for grammar, logic, and images are strict.Overall, the journal is still quite good.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1183917977@qq.com

Author: 1183917977@qq.com


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-03 12:09:15
article was submitted for 20 days. The authors and the authors did not receive an email from the journal. Instead, other authors received it. Have you encountered this situation?I used the 163 mailbox with my boss. Is this mailbox blocked by journals?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 1183917977@qq.com

Author: xy


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-18 10:37:36
one month out of the first trial, the revised second half of the second trial, the second week after the second change.Work efficiently.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | xy

Author: mopianqian


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-24 08:37:45
Submitted comments within 1 month, the opinions are relatively pertinent, and after being revised again, they will be accepted within one week, and the review draft is very efficient.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | mopianqian

Author: shixiaozhuce@126.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-20 09:31:31
The journal is very efficient. After submitting the manuscript for one month, it was repaired. It was given a two-month repair period. After the revision, the second half of the manuscript was revised and twoDuring the revision period of the month, I spent ten days uploading the second revision, and received the journal with high efficiency three days later.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | shixiaozhuce@126.com

Author: blue


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-01-20 10:12:27
Published a paper describing the scientific research of any aspect of the results of the original research.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | blue

Author: leee


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-29 16:41:44
repaired back and forth 3 times, lasted four months
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | leee

Author: Aaron


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-31 10:59:52
is strictly reviewed and has high requirements for pictures and languages.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Aaron

Author: doctorli113@163.com


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-12-11 21:44:59
Review is still relatively fast, the opinions of REVIEW are very pertinent, received after minor repairs.Nice journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | doctorli113@163.com

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [NEUROSCIENCE]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service