Nanoscale Research Letters

Received review comments at the end of March. All three reviewers suggested minor revisions. We took two weeks to supplement experiments, analyze data, and complete the response letter. All three reviewers gave comments for acceptance yesterday, and we got the letter of acceptance. Thank you!

(5) Thank | 饼师

It was submitted on February 20. It was under review on February 27. Reviewers completed it on March 13. Reviewers were assigned on March 30. Do you mean the third reviewer was assigned as the two reviewers have different opinions? How are you on the 11th floor?

(0) Thank | 彩虹

Our paper is on crystal silicon solar battery. After submission the manuscript was sent to peer review within 3 days. The result of the first- review came back in half a month. Four reviewers. I revised the paper and resubmitted.  The paper was accepted three weeks later. Not counting the month I was on vacation, this article was accepted in one month, which is quite good. If you need a paper soon, you can try this journal. The efficiency is high when publication is not free.

(0) Thank | llyaomo@163.com

It took only a month from submission to acceptance. The review was fast but also serious. The reviewers provided very helpful feedback. My many grammar and vocabulary problems had to be modified. And some content had to be modified. For example, if you add experimental equipment, you will be able to list the changes in the revised draft.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

has been submitted for 10 days, and is still inviting reviewers, and it feels very slow.Is there any news on the 12th floor article?

(0) Thank | 皮皮同学

More than two months, or under review, I have recently selectd in this journal

(0) Thank | 博士僧

selectd for nearly a month, has been the Reviewers Assigned state, the middle time has changed twice

(0) Thank | SCITOP

2 05 Submission3 10 2 are given to minor repairs3.25 Modifying the return5.28 1 reviewer disappeared, and there was no reply~~ Editor-in-Chief invited 2 reviewers~~1 to accept 1 overhaul (this overhaul is obviously a layman)6.15 Revised and returned, politely introduced the relevant theories in this field6.24 Reviewer of overhaul to minor repair7.12 minor repair return8.10 AcceptThere are fast and slow, look at luck.

(1) Thank | mazzyeagle

first English article, first half month, 10 days after minor repairRecruitment, the middle of the reply to the comments delayed for a month, the review speed is very fast.The only insufficient page fee is too high: $1,450.The article focuses on the ion exchange of inorganic perovskites.

(2) Thank | 还可以

Generally, there is news in the first instance in one month. Now even if the impact factor has reached 2.8, it will be officially expected to break through 3 in June!

(0) Thank | hahaxiao

The second article was rejected.Two reviewers, one refused, one gave some comments, and finally refused

(0) Thank | 第一帅

is very fast, the editor is responsible.NARL is SCIE?Is it SCI?

(0) Thank | 1064664751@qq.com

review is still very fast, selectd out on October 30, returned to minor repairs at the end of November, received on December 1st, need a layout fee of 940 pounds, I heard thatIt is necessary to drop from Zone 2 to Zone 3, but after reading the new partition in November, it still writes Zone 2.

(0) Thank | yiukk

money-saving tools, a teacher editor of the school, huh, huh!

(20) Thank | 3321

journal is still very fast, and the layout fee is required. After two weeks after the submitment, it is under review. The two reviewers are still very responsible and gave many review comments.And two months of overhaul time, saying that my reply review comments are enough for an article...After the change is accepted, the influence factor will continue to rise

(19) Thank | zzsad

9Submission No. 5,Major revision on September 27, and revised draft on November 7th.November 7th, second trial, minor repair, submitted out four days laterAccepted on November 15th.Very fast, two reviewers.

(14) Thank | zhffriend

Magazine review is quite fast, Received: 7 January 2013Accepted: 14 February 2013Published: 2 March 2013 is the back page fee is too expensive, or hit the pound, must go to the big bank foreign exchange

(3) Thank | Anonymous

Please select for Nanoscale Research Letters review status changed to Editorial decision making, how is it

(0) Thank | Anonymous

modified 2 times acceptance, it is easier.The layout fee is too expensive, £750. It is recommended to pay by credit card.It seems that the relevant institutions of the Chinese Academy of Sciences will be cheaper to contribute.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Feel that this journal is not kind, has selectd two, and the situation is exactly the same: after submitting the manuscript for more than a month, he received the rejection letter from the editor, and there is no external audit at all.If your editor thinks that the manuscript level is low within 1-2 weeks, it is completely acceptable to withdraw the manuscript. It will take a long time to make a draft. How long does it take for the editor to review the first trial for more than a month?However, fortunately, two pieces of rejected ones have been published, and one has been selectd for a journal of more than 2 points. At present, the review comments have been returned, minor repairs.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

How can this journal submission go to the contact details section every time, and then go down and go on?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.springer.com/materials/nanotechnology/journal/11671

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Have studied this journal carefully.It is a journal belonging to SCI-E.SCI-E is often classified within the scope of SCI in China, and the real SCI-E is actually a network version of SCI.In other words, if the SCI is not good, it may be classified into SCI-E. If SCI-E is good, it may rise to SCI.The last article, from submission, revision, to acceptance, was shared for 2 months.Feeling efficiency is OK, there are 2 reviewers, the problem is not difficult to answer, but more.There is also a high charge after acceptance.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The review speed is very slow, and the editing is very draggy.Finally, the reviewers were found to be uneven, and some comments were very layman!

(0) Thank | Anonymous