MATERIALS LETTERS

Received 12 November 2018, Revised 10 December 2018, Accepted 11 December 2018, Available online 19 December 2018. The one who asked me to post the title of the article before, come and see the timeline yourself, so you don’t have to say that others lie to you. Enhanced electrical conductivity of silver nanoparticles decorated fabrics with sandwich micro-structure coating layer based on "silver colloid effect"

(3) Thank | 尘封百年

Note: the reviewers can be very picky about technical wording, the key words included. The reviewers are pretty fast and friendly, though. We are pretty happy with the overall experience.

(38) Thank | 小白一枚

12.25-submit1-25- minor repair2-10-见刊

(0) Thank | 爱美丽

1.1 Arbitration, still reviewing, although stillFeeling awkward, but still praying haha.

(0) Thank | yudeyou

The three districts are still in line with the quality of their articles.The growth trend of the impact factor is not diminished. At present, the immediate impact factor is 10107/3466=2.916. When the impact factor is released in June, the over 3 should be no problem.

(39) Thank | 骨

fell to zone 3???

(4) Thank | Magnifico

12.12 Submitted12. 21 please edit your manuscript. (Required to put the experiment in the body, only to submit the trial. Before seeing ML some articles did not put the experiment in the text)12.22 Submitted2019.1.2 is still submitted....It takes a long time for the Christmas holiday.

(0) Thank | yudeyou

2018.9.25 Submit2018.10.31 First-instance opinion return2018.11.28 Submit revised draft2018.12.1 Second review opinion return2018.12.11 Submit a second revisionIn the middle of the Christmas holiday, the review is slower2019.1.1 AcceptThe first sci, the overall speed of the journal is very fast, and I lost nearly one and a half months when I returned to repair.Thanks to Editor Y.F. Zheng, the work efficiency is high. The entire review process is not delayed in the hands of Editor, and the direction of the reviewers is very consistent. The proposed review comments are very pertinent and help the article.Blessing Editor YF Zheng, blessing Materials Letters. Looking forward to returning to the second district, haha~

(4) Thank | 谁是趣多多

Oct 04, 2018 submitted to journalNov 16, 2018, the moderator, reviewer 2 raised 4 questions, the reviewer 1 is not clear, the editor did not send it to me, gave a month to reply to the question, and returned to the end at the end of the month.Dec 20, 2018 acceptDec 21, 2018 completed-acceptThe first sci, happy!

(14) Thank | 波涛学长

Contribution time: 2018/11/12Reception time: 2018/12/12For a whole month, the middle gave a medium repair, only one opinion - modify the punctuation... dragged a few days to change the language to repair, received the next day.The overall efficiency is particularly good, but the new Chinese Academy of Sciences partition has been reduced to Zone 3, a little uncomfortable, but think of Nature Communication are 2 districts, immediately balanced [捂脸].

(18) Thank | 尘封百年

Aug 16,2018 With EditorAug 18, 2018 Under ReviewAug 31,2018 Under Editor EvaluationThen this state lasts for a month...Oct 05, 2018 Moderate RevisionNov 03,2018 Revised Manuscript SubmittedNov 03,2018 With EditorNov 04,2018 Required Reviews CompletedNov 14,2018 Required Reviews CompletedNov 24,2018 AcceptThe first SCI, three months before and after, waits for a long time, but fortunately the result is good.The reviewer's comments are very professional, and the editors are also very responsible. I wish the journals better and better.

(6) Thank | 花花君

Received Date: 26 September 2018Revised Date: 25 October 2018Accepted Date: 27 October 2018The speed is very fast, just one month, not bad.

(4) Thank | 性感的面条

7-22 submitted to journal7-25 with editor, modify the format, the format is particularly important, can not exceed 8 pages, 2000 words.Must write paper according to guild for author8-2 under review9-26 simplified layout9-28 revised manuscript submitted10-7 with editor10-8 under review10-13 accept10-15 available onlineSpecial thanks to the editor Y.F. Zheng for finding a reviewer who is basically the same as my research, so minor repair.It may be that the editor has too many manuscripts and the time is a little longer.But very good, the first article.

(4) Thank | AirCR7

7.24 contributed8.18 Rework9.6 repaired back9.20 AcceptThis journal is still relatively rigorous.This submission, the review comments are very good, two minor repairs, almost no changes are required, but even so, after the return of the submission, the editor still asks one of the reviewers to review it.Sometimes some journals with an impact factor of 5.0 are accepted by direct editing.

(1) Thank | organomaterials Yu

August 28 with editorThe status has not changed so far..

(3) Thank | yinghappy

Received 1 July 2018,Revised 7 August 2018,
 Accepted 26 August 2018,Available online 27 August 2018.

(2) Thank | 小牛

July 23With editorAugust 11 Under ReviewAugust 21 Under Editor EvluationAugust 25 Under Editor EvluationLife and death are not...

(2) Thank | 科学贫农

July 23rdSo far with the editor, what is the situation, fierce and less?

(3) Thank | 1208257400@qq.com

Submitted on July 6thRevisited on July 14Submit revised draft on July 21Accepted on July 23

(3) Thank | manzhangxu@163.com

Submitted to the present for more than three months now, two reviewers, the editor gave the first revision to the middle, and the second review returned to the review after two days.The editor asked for minor repairs. After the minor repair, he was under review again for a month. The result is unknown.

(0) Thank | 1486674919@qq.com

mad, and gave a mid-repair on July 2, but did not give review comments;Send an email to the editor, saying that it is to inform the editor, but the editor has not given any advice; after waiting for 5 days, I asked, let me wait patiently;On July 13th, it became an editorial evaluation;On July 14th, the paper was rejected, and the English was too bad.

(9) Thank | feiaifei

The review period is relatively long, which may be a direction problem. Both articles were received after about 6 months.

(0) Thank | 1039722130@qq.com

From submission to receipt for 22 days.A reviewer with a more professional opinion.Back to edit direct reception

(5) Thank | qingdaolzw@163.com

I was rejected by the editor after less than a week, saying that my manuscript is too professional, not suitable for the journal, and it is recommended to submit in other majors.I can't think of a letter that is so high?It took me a lot of time to change the requirements of the journal. The result was changed. I have not submitted it for trial, and I refused it directly. I am speechless.(I think that the paper is OK, at least for review and then refused.) The results are not sent to me, pitted.

(0) Thank | 最近连续被拒郁闷

Someone was accepted for 18 days, some were accepted for three months, some were rejected for two months, only I was rejected after 7 months.True tragedy, play with me暧昧

(0) Thank | 1779873865@qq.com