Landslides

I had 3 overhauls in the review process, which lasted from October 2011 until February 2013, which my article was published. The journal was reasonable and professional. The reviewers were also very professional. They kept discussing the issues, reviewing comments and reviewing the responses.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted at the end of July, first-instance overhaul.After the revision at the end of November, the reviewer directly passed, accept.

(3) Thank | gang3217

5 Submitted at the end of the month, Under initial review in early June, then Under in depth review, 8 initial overhaul, overhaul at the end of August, minor repair at the end of October, revisited on November 10, tenRecruited on February 3.The external review experts have put forward a lot of revision opinions, which is very useful for improving the quality of the papers.The review process for journals is very strict, and the top journal in engineering geological field, IF has risen to 3.657, and it is still on the rise.

(1) Thank | 015010910026@sjtu.edu.cn

From submission to recruitment for more than 2 months, during the process of handling the handling editor dissatisfied the external review expert review is too slow to directly review the manuscript expert, review the week to minor repair, greatSubmission experience.

(0) Thank | Goodman

Submitted in February 2013, has been waiting for the status, Editor Assigned. After the draft, the Under Review will be started at the end of March. At the end of May, after receiving the overhaul notice in early June, after returning the amendment, after receiving the minor repair notice in August,At the end of September, the prompt Required Reviews Completed today became Under Initial Review

(0) Thank | Anonymous