X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 54119 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ SOIL SEDIMENT
ISSN1439-0108
E-ISSN1614-7480
h-index59
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
4.800.8441.062
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Earth and Planetary Sciences
Subcategory: Earth-Surface Processes
Q123 / 142
Category: Earth and Planetary Sciences
Subcategory: Stratigraphy
Q19 / 39

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)9.40%
Official Websitehttps://www.springer.com/journal/11368
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/JSSS
Open AccessNo
PublisherSPRINGER HEIDELBERG, TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, HEIDELBERG, GERMANY, D-69121
Subject AreaEnvironmental Science
Country/Area of PublicationGERMANY
Publication FrequencyQuarterly
Year Publication Started2001
Annual Article Volume343
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1439-0108%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.7 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 66%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS: Write a review
Author: YongYuan


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-08-12 21:48:05
The second JSS paper in this year. It took 5 months from submission to acceptance. Now I share the specific timeline for your reference: 18 Mar 2020 Submitted to Journal; 01 Apr 2020 With Editor; 26 Apr 2020 Under Review; 12 Jun 2020 Required Reviews Completed; 15 Jun 2020 Revise (Minor Revision); 30 Jun 2020 Revision Submitted to Journal; 02 Jul 2020 With Editor; 24 Jul 2020 Under Review; 08 Aug 2020 Required Reviews Completed; 11 Aug 2020 Decision in Process; 12 Aug 2020 Accept.

(3) Thank | YongYuan

Author: 寒江独钓


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-04-29 08:37:33
“submitted to journal” lasted for one month, so I urged once and was told that it would be processed soon. It was “with editor” three days later, and then the status lasted for a little more than a month. I wrote another letter to remind the manuscript. It was rejected that night: As we have had trouble moving this manuscript through the review process, we feel that the best thing is to release the manuscript back to you and suggest that you try another journal. Thank Professor Philip N. Owens, who let me feel relief. I won’t submit to this journal again, and I’m tired.

(1) Thank | 寒江独钓

Author: 土水土


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-03-10 15:36:00
I have some articles published in this journal, but it has never been so slow. The manuscript was submitted in July last year, and major revision was required in one month and a half. The comments of the reviewers were relatively professional, and it was resubmitted after a careful revision. After major revision, and then 2 months after being sent for review, the comments were received, and minor revision was required. There were a few comments, and it was resubmitted after minor revisions. A week after being submitted to journal, it took 2 weeks for “with editor”. And then, it was sent for review again; I urged twice by email. It took 2 months for the review; it took a long time for “required reviews complete”. Finally, the review comments were received, and the reviewers agreed to accept it. The editor asked to revise the format of references and polish the language (I feel that it would be more reasonable to raise these comments of such many revisions in the previous stage, which would also save everyone’s time). The revision was submitted in a week after polishing the language, and it took a long time for “revision submitted to journal”, and there was no more news… Judging from the previous submissions and review of this journal, I feel that the manuscript processing speed of this journal is pretty high. But in the past half a year, the efficiency of processing the manuscripts has dropped significantly. I hope the journal can improve it in time.

(5) Thank | 土水土

Author: jiangyf0308@163.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-25 09:57:47
I submitted my manuscript to the journal in January. It was with an editor three days later and under review the following day. My paper required major revisions (I had three reviewers; editor Moira Ledger is very nice) and it was revised and back to the journal by late April. After further revisions, it was sent back a third time in late May. It was accepted two days later. This journal cares about the quality of the language, title pages need to be separated, and the abstract also needs to follow the template of the journal.

(1) Thank | jiangyf0308@163.com

Author: 因为不变


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-10 10:15:31
2018-10-29 submitted to journal2018-10-30 with editor2018-11-09 under review2018-11-29 under review2018-11-30 Required Reviews Completed2018-11-31 decision in process2018-12-1 major revision2018-12-3 revision submitted to journal2018-12-3 with editor2018-12-4 under review2018-12-5 Required Reviews Completed2018-12-6 decision in process2018-12-9 acceptThe second JSSS, 40 days from review to accept, should be considered very fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 因为不变

Author: 朱小抗113


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-20 21:44:51
2018-8-30 Submission2018-9-1 External audit (in the middle of 9.14 changed state, it should be a comment back)2018-10-30 Overhaul (two reviewers, a total of 15 comments, overall positive, let add some description of the study area and method, then find a foreigner touch)2018-11-15 Rework2018-11-20 receivingBecause the reform was serious, and they were all in accordance with the opinions, the editor-in-chief did not send it again and received it directly.This journal is not bad in soil science, the key efficiency is very high, and it is highly recommended for graduation!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 朱小抗113

Author: 三十二画生


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-08 23:35:34
The journal is highly efficient, 2017-5-25 contribution, 2017-7-26 overhaul, 2017-8-12 repair, 2017-8-16 direct reception.Two reviewers, editor Zucong Cai, are very efficient and responsible.From submission to reception for less than three months, it is recommended that students who are eager to make an article can try it. The impact factor of the journal has been relatively stable, and it is hoped that it can be transferred to the agriculture and forestry science area. This is basically a journal in the 2nd district.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 三十二画生

Author: 渤海一粟


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-29 19:23:18
2018-2-18 submitted to journal2018-04-23 major revision2018-8-2 minor revision2018-8-26 accept
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 渤海一粟

Author: Windy


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-21 18:43:59
The first submission on March 25, the major revision of about two months, the revision on June 25, and the reception on July 17.The submission experience is very good, the editing is very fast, and the comments are also very pertinent. Individuals suggest that students who are anxious to submit articles can select for this journal. As a factor of 3, the impact factor is good, and the price is very high.Not high, my experimental design is general, but also the first time to submit articles, want to try water, did not expect so smooth).
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Windy

Author: bb


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-20 20:07:15
Just published in the SCI journal, JSS has not been searched, is it being delisted?Just published an article online, I want to cry...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | bb

Author: qqqqqqqq


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-15 06:47:17
Very good submission experience, four weeks in the first trial, overhaul, revised three weeks later, accepted within two weeks.Overall, the efficiency is very high, there is a problem consultation, and the editor's reply is timely.In the field of soil science, it is okay to see the impact factor. Unfortunately, it is only in the three districts. I don't know if there is any hope to transfer back to the agriculture and forestry science in the future. This will enable the second district, mainly because the domestic area is too heavy.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | qqqqqqqq

Author: wwwj


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-29 07:16:02
can definitely be regarded as a mainstream journal in soil science. The manuscript processing is very efficient, it has certain requirements for the innovation of the article, and the language requirements are higher.After submitting the manuscript for one month, I will return to the reviewer's opinion, refuse to re-submit the manuscript, and now I have completed the re-submitment. I am anxiously waiting for it. I hope I can!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | wwwj

Author: ff


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-28 15:44:40
A very efficient journal, selectd twice, was rejected last time, but the reviewers gave advice very professional and helped quite big.The submission was submitted for one month for two months, overhauled, and it took one month to receive it after the repair.In general, the journal handles manuscripts very quickly. It is expected that the impact factor will be around 2.7 this year and should be able to go up to 3 next year.Recommend everyone to contribute, especially suitable for graduates and other articles.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | ff

Author: liebe


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-23 10:08:17
A little more than a month in the first trial, and received another month or so after the revision, the speed is still very fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | liebe

Author: 爬行的飞鱼


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-19 16:02:53
2016-12-15Submission2017-1-18 Overhaul2017-2-11 repaired backReceived on 2017-3-18
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 爬行的飞鱼

Author: QSWG520


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-02-20 09:14:09
first trial for two months, overhaul, revisionUploaded 5 days to be received.The soil sector feels good journals.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | QSWG520

Author: yudi


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-09-22 10:59:25
Others agree, especially the Korean professor said that he is very professional, but it seems to be somewhat selfish and asks to quote their articles.Another reviewer (I guess it is the editor-in-chief) has few professional opinions, saying that the manuscript has a lot of English grammar and spelling mistakes.This is very confusing, because this manuscript, the professional company that often cooperates with the company has been proofread twice.And the drafter is a European.The Chinese editor in Australia seems to be overconfident in his English.
Show Review in Original Language
(100) Thank | yudi

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-15 19:41:00
Why is my first draft for so long?In 3 months, after the modification, I returned the editor for 17 days. I have not changed the state and I am in a hurry...After 1 month, I am currently directly hiring, and it’s a good thing!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-22 09:36:00
is now Decision in Process, I feel that the first review is still relatively fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-01 22:06:00
3 Submitted at the beginning of the month, returned to minor repairs in early April, and acceptd at the beginning of May. It should be said that the efficiency of this journal is still very good.The editor is also very serious.In particular, the abstract of this journal is required to be written in a format, and several sections may differ from most journals.2012 IF What do you think is the interval? Can you pass 2.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-28 14:58:00
Journal is very professional and very standardized, the editor is very dedicated, and the review speed is OK 2012.7.4 Submission 2012.10.21 Overhaul 2012.12.10 Submit the revised draft 2013.2.23 Minor repair 2013.3.13 Submit the revised draft 2013.4.15 Accept 2013.4.25 Submit proof one week after the online
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-29 00:55:00
I feel that this journal is not TOP.The overall feeling is OK, more standard, but not enough TOP
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-15 16:37:00
Just submitted an article, pray here!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-18 17:05:00
Personal feeling is a very good quality journal. According to an associate editor, this year's draft rate is 70%, which is quite difficult and demanding.But this year IF actually fell to 2, as one of the top journals in the soil category, it really should not be.I feel that the journal should make some adjustments in its business strategy. After all, IF will directly affect the amount of articles submitted, and the amount of submissions will fall, and the quality will naturally decline.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-29 16:44:00
2012The latest impact factor 1.863
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service