ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA

I studied in the direction of the analysis of new material combining harmful substances in food. The paper was submitted on September 18, 2019. I received notification of major revisions on October 21, and were given 42 days to revise. Then on December 1, the revised manuscript and response letter to review comments were resubmitted to the system. On December 7th, completed-accept. I thought that the editor was very responsible and also interested in the research content of my article. But one of the reviewers has a harsh opinion and I responded to him with more than 10,000 words, trying to explain as detailed as possible. I felt very lucky that I didn’t expect to the acceptance within a week after returning the major revision version. It took two and a half months from submission to acceptance~ The review speed was normal, and the editor processed very fast. You can choose to submit to this journal, if in a hurry.

(0) Thank | xiangshout

For the sake of other authors, I want to review my submission experience. I submitted my first draft in September and received constructive reviews about a month or so later. The reviewer’s all had constructive comments and some new ideas, but many of the comments focused on the writing. Long story short – rejection. However, a new editor-in-chief thought there was something to my research, so my manuscript went through four iterations of reviews/reviewers (!!!). The fourth draft was finally accepted. Overall, the reviewers were very serious, and any small problems in the language, study, etc. will be tirelessly pointed out. However, I must admit that I did learn from these reviews and experience.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Encounter a noResponsible editors, manuscripts were submitted for review and invited to multiple reviewers (>3), one of whom was an acquaintance, so the comments were more positive, another overhaul, one reason was vague and no constructive comments were made,Rejected the draft, the final editor decided to reject the draft, and the final review comments only two people!!One is overhaul, the other is rejection, and the opinions of acquaintances are hidden??

(15) Thank | 11

The reviewer is very responsible, the review is quick, overhauled, and directly acceptd after minor repairs.Still very lucky to submitted the first draft.Ha ha...Go ahead, come on!Share it together: 725554986

(0) Thank | 707145297

The reviewer is very responsible and the review is coming to an end.Overhaul once, minor repairs, it is directly acceptd.Ha ha..Let's share it!725554986

(0) Thank | 707145297@qq.com

requires a certain degree of innovation, both reviewers are very nice, a minor repair, a direct acceptance.I was the journal that was selectd after CC was rejected. I feel that this journal is still very good.

(1) Thank | cxz

Magazine reviewers and editors are very rigorous, and the initial review time is 1 month. Both reviewers affirmed the significance of the study, but because the English is too bad, the reviewerIt is recommended to overhaul and also make up a bunch of data.After repairing the manuscript, the editor still feels that the language needs to be further polished, and there are many places that do not conform to the English habits.After submitting again, I received it less than two days later.The first SCI in life, although bumpy, is also lucky enough.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Magazine reviewers and editors are very rigorous, and the initial review time is 1 month. Both reviewers affirmed the significance of the study, but because the English is too bad, the reviewerIt is recommended to overhaul and also make up a bunch of data.After repairing the manuscript, the editor still feels that the language needs to be further polished, and there are many places that do not conform to the English habits.After submitting again, I received it less than two days later.The first SCI in life, although bumpy, is also lucky enough.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The first SCI in life, the process is really roughHowever, I learned a lot and gained a lot.The specific contribution log is as follows:2017 11 27, contribution; 2017 12 25, not submitted for review, because the language problem was rejected, the editor suggested re-run after retouching.2018 01 17, re-injection after retouching; 2018 03 23, two reviewers, one minor repair, one overhaul, the editor gave 42 days of modification time; 2018 04 09, modified and then selectd.2018 05 03, direct reception.

(1) Thank | DZ1424040@smail.nju.edu.cn

2017.9.23 Submission, review for one month, it took two weeks to modify, and I will receive it soon, from submission to receiving more than two months

(1) Thank | jiacky

The review speed is very fast. Before I selectd for two articles, it is about one month's review time.

(0) Thank | haler

2017.4.20 Submission2017.7.26 First-instance reply2017.9.5 After the overhaul2017.10.10 Second-instance reply2017.10.18 Post-review2017.10.24 Receive

(4) Thank | 1013838495@qq.com

Self-assembled structures of N-alkylated bisbenzimidazolyl naphthalene in aqueous media for highly sensitive detection of picric acid. Anal Chim Acta, 976, 74-83, 2017, modified twice in the middle, followed byRequires change of grammar, grammatical requirements are very strict, but also innovative

(0) Thank | 小城

submitted a week was rejected, the editor suggested to select for the drug journal

(0) Thank | 西域老人

One month a week, overhaul; take a month to return, half a month to accept

(0) Thank | wangde

Magazine is indeed more rigorous, value method novelty!

(1) Thank | 325

has an articleI feel that the ACA journal is really strict, both in terms of grammar and novelty.Also took me a lot of time to modifyMarch 5 submitApril 2 accept after major reviewSubmitted on April 17April 19th completely accept

(0) Thank | 了尘

Usually everyone likes to compare JCA with ACAACA is a comprehensive chemistry with a wide range of acceptances, so there are many articles on nanomaterials that are innovative.However, JCA was irrigated by quantitative articles. In China, regardless of scientific research or testing institutions, the amount of arbitrarily irrigated water, and because the quantitative research population is large, the citation rate will be high.As a result, the impact factor of JCA is higher, but the level of integration is not necessarily.Relative preference for some ACA

(0) Thank | wtf

Innovation requirements are higher than JCA, but JCA's workload is generally larger!JCA is now flooding a lot of articles, and the volume of manuscripts is large, so IF can't catch up with ACA, and this trend may still be in the future!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

ACA has a high requirement for the novelty of the analytical method, which is also the main reason why its IF is rising rapidly. Of course, there are also factors that summarize the article.The journal itself is very good, and the manuscript is very professional and fast.I originally changed the article ACA rejected by JCA, and the result was accepted after minor repairs.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Impact Factor: 4.555

(0) Thank | Anonymous

just received an article, I feel quite lucky. When I submitted it for one month, I changed the reviewer and the result was reviewed.One month, two months later, I came back to review the comments, one agreed, one disagreed, and the result was overhauled.After half a month of overhaul, I will return for one month and receive it directly!From submission to reception for a total of three months, I feel that the quality of the journal is still good, although the impact factor is indeed outrageous!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Reject and resubmit after the first submitment for three months, carefully revised according to the review comments and marked in the original text, resubmit after 7 months, after one and a half months is accept after minor revision,The review comments for the two days were very simple. I returned them in a few days, with the editor two days later accept.Although the first rejection and resubmit is very painful, it is indeed worthwhile. After the change, the article grades have really improved. I really appreciate the opportunity given by the editor and the reviewer's opinion

(0) Thank | Anonymous

天啦, thisWhat kind of journal is it, it takes 10 days for this long review time, or with the editor, if it is still in this state for 20 days, then it will be rejected, and it will not be hurt!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

1 On the 25th of the month, under review on February 9th, there is no news for four months, that slow...So I chose for 6 months.It was even worse before the manuscript was submitted. After more than half a year of major repairs, the editors were rejected on the grounds that the methodology was not good enough. It was suggested to modify the re-submitment. After the re-submitment, they were given different review experts. The results were rejected again.More than a year...Hematemesis...

(0) Thank | Anonymous