My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 117616 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ PHYS D APPL PHYS
ISSN0022-3727
E-ISSN1361-6463
h-index172
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.300.8991.144
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Acoustics and Ultrasonics
Q17 / 43
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Condensed Matter Physics
Q179 / 403
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Surfaces, Coatings and Films
Q121 / 120
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Q151 / 234

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)9.40%
Official Websitehttp://iopscience.iop.org/0022-3727
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://atom.iop.org/atom/usermgmt.nsf/EGWebSubmissionWelcome?OpenForm&ISSN=0022-3727
Open AccessNo
PublisherIOP PUBLISHING LTD, DIRAC HOUSE, TEMPLE BACK, BRISTOL, ENGLAND, BS1 6BE
Subject AreaPhysics
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyWeekly
Year Publication Started1970
Annual Article Volume960
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0022-3727%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.9 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 85%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS: Write a review
Author: 你点赞东哥很喜欢,你要踩,东哥不高兴


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-06-02 12:16:24
After APL did not accept for the article, I transferred it here. The article is all about calculation and simulation, without experimental verification; 4/12/2018 submitted to journal; 24/12/2018 major revision (due date: 21/01/2019). Two reviewers asked a few questions of medium difficulty. Reviewer 1 thought it was a general article; Reviewer 2 thought it was with good opinion, but experiment was strongly required. There would be a high probability of failure if just to find a similar reference as evidence to support if there is no way to do experiment. During the revision, they would notify me to submit the paper one week earlier. I emailed to the journal that the paper delayed to 04/02/2019. 04/02/2019 R1 submitted to journal; 19/02/2019 minor revision. The reviewer requested me to add his literature. But this version was not accepted by editor after adding. 21/02/2019 R2 submitted to journal; 21/02/2019 Accept; 28/02/2019 check and proof; 17/03/2019 published

(6) Thank | 你点赞东哥很喜欢,你要踩,东哥不高兴

Author: 907390036@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-15 15:06:57
After being rejected, the letter was changed to a paper.  After the comments were addressed, the editorial department returned to the original reviewer but they only said that the topic was not suitable for publication in the journal, that it was more suitable for journals of materials. It can be said that the journal is very responsible, and overall, I feel the process is very efficient. The initial review was 15 days, and the subsequent review was within 5 days.

(7) Thank | 907390036@qq.com

Author: Aarron


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-29 19:50:59
Journals are very efficient.The systematic requirements for the article are not so high, but if the innovation is relatively high, it is easier.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Aarron

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-07 16:36:49
June 1st submission, now August 7th, still no news.The efficiency of this journal is not as high as it is legendary.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 15620525267@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-28 15:08:58
Received 8 April 2018Accepted 31 May 2018Accepted Manuscript online 31 May 2018Published 20 June 2018The first day of the first day of submission is in the hands of the reviewer. One month later, the reviewer's opinion is accepted, and the other is accepted after the minor repair.high efficiency.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 15620525267@163.com

Author: dingery@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-22 10:25:39
2018-3-22 Submission, start reviewing after one week2018-5-31 First-instance opinion returned, two reviewers, one did not ask any questions, the other let Xiao Xiu, modify the chart2018-6-5 Review of the manuscript2018-06-11 The initial reception will be sent by email within one week, and the first draft can be found on Google.Summary: The first trial time is about 2 months, and if it is successful, it will be quite fast to receive it in about 3 months.I am doing the direction of the total shape memory, welcome to learn from each other and talk about it.Http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6463/aaccbc/pdfI have already made 2 papers and reviewed them once. At present, there are 2 districts in the big category. I wish you better and better.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | dingery@163.com

Author: xz0003@surrey.ac.uk


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-02 03:40:03
The peak loop, my Boss later wrote appeal, the editor found a board inside the journal to be an arbitrator again, gave the moderation revision, the time was Sep 14, given two weeks.After that:Sep22 resubmitSep26 acceptSep27 onlineOct 27 publishedPersonally feel that this journal is very efficient, but JCR has only 2 districts: PHYSICS, APPLIED 44/148 Q2Deaf people are doing micro-nano adhesion contact mechanics, welcome to discuss the same direction or the same!
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | xz0003@surrey.ac.uk

Author: lol


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-14 09:23:56
5Submission No.9,On June 28th, the revision of the comments, the two reviewers, the moderation revision.Return to the revised draft on July 6th.Received on July 13th.Real-time impact factor if=2.588.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | lol

Author: xz0003@surrey.ac.uk


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-08 01:26:53
June 13 submittedJune 16 referee asignedJune 17 awaiting referee reportJuly 25 awaiting decisionJuly 28 awaiting referee report This is the case where the editor is looking for an arbitrator.Aug 6 awaiting decision Estimated arbitrator completed arbitrationAug 7 rejectedAfter reading the feedback, I found that referee 1 suggested that it was accepted after minor repairs. Refere 2 felt that this article is very interesting, but I hope to have experimental support. (This article is purely theoretical derivation plus finite element verification. It is estimated that this reviewer is focused on the experimental direction.The arbitrator's feedback is that the article is very interesting, but it is not recommended to select for JPD.Then he was shot.The overall feeling is that the editor is not very fond of this article, because the first two reviewers I feel is a positive and a flat.Very depressed, can only modify the other submitted.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | xz0003@surrey.ac.uk

Author: wangshuai20040217@126.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-17 14:11:54
Received 7 April 2017Revised 23 June 2017Accepted 28 June 2017Accepted Manuscript online 28 June 2017The review speed is slightly slower than expected, and may be in the hands of the reviewers, but the opinions of the two reviewers are very pertinent, and the quality of the article is helpful! Very good!This year's impact factor has risen a little bit, and there is a chance to select again!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | wangshuai20040217@126.com

Author: liuminghuan13@mails.ucas.ac.cn


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-26 11:09:15
The quality of the article is quite good, and the editing communication is very efficient.I don't know why, this review is a bit slow, the review is a total of 3 rounds, the first round of review is 40 days, the second round is 30 days, and the third round is 36 days.Anyway, the article was received.Thanks to the editorial department.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | liuminghuan13@mails.ucas.ac.cn

Author: 及其


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-20 21:42:47
journal influence shadow drop.This journal has a feature, the more strange the structure is, the easier it is to see a lot of such articles.Submit the results to the results for two months!Efficiency is not high!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 及其

Author: aa


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-15 16:49:24
The first submission was rejected, but gave a chance to re-submit after the revision. The two reviewers gave me some suggestions for improving the article, according to the requirements.Make up the experiment and modify the article, re-submit; give advice within one week, one agrees to accept, and the other raises some questions (my substrate is not RhB, all questions raised say how RhB is... once suspectedIs it my draft?), the overall minor repair, seems to receive a greater chance; return to the revised draft again, one week to comment, refused to engage!It can be said that it can be transferred to a 4-zone journal with a factor of 0.9. I don’t want to say anything, it’s just inexplicable!Two months before and after, the review time is faster
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | aa

Author: 625073579@qq.com


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-25 17:48:26
50 days to review the results, half a month after the overhaul.The editor is very nice and the journal editor is very efficient.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 625073579@qq.com

Author: 月夜枫


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-27 13:49:16
In my research direction, JPD has been a lot of JAP, the editing efficiency is very fast, and the reviewers are also very professional.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 月夜枫

Author: INSA


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-13 18:42:09
This journal is very efficient, and it gives a good evaluation of the new experimental content. There are two reviewers, and several of them have received no comments.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | INSA

Author: 953349274@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-30 17:59:49
7月2#Submission, No. 4 transfer of copyright,Immediately entered the review, returning opinions on August 19, moderate revise, returning on the 23rd, waiting for the ruling on the 26th, and provisionally accepted on the 30th.I feel that the quality of the article is not worse than JAP, it may be better, the same grade.The editing efficiency is very high and it is worth a shot.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 953349274@qq.com

Author: 347067803@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-02-20 11:22:03
The journal is very efficient. After three days, it will be sent to the external audit. The result will be given one month, and the repair will be accepted for one week.Not bad.
Show Review in Original Language
(36) Thank | 347067803@qq.com

Author: qingp206@163.com


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-11-24 11:17:40
don't know now The article accepts no, how is the progress?Thank you!Similar to your situation
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | qingp206@163.com

Author: qingp206@163.com


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-11-24 11:17:05
Don't know Now The article accepts no, how is the progress?Thank you!Almost like your situation
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | qingp206@163.com

Author: xubingzheng@nuaa.edu.cn


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-09-25 16:10:47
Overall rating: Very good journalThis work is considered to be more innovative, selectd for OSA's OE, two reviewers, one accepts a rejection, feels that there is no new contribution, and one select veto, after submiting in the journal, I found three reviewers.The opinion is still two acceptances, one rejection (thinking that the same review is with the OSA reviewer, the words and tone are similar), the journal did not directly refuse, and found a big cow for arbitration, the big cow said that the rejection was false.The goods are very "ignorant" and "arrogant", so I only answer the opinions of the other two people. After the answer, I am very happy to receive it. The things are very tortuous, the ending is very good, not a one-select veto is not necessarily a good journal!
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | xubingzheng@nuaa.edu.cn

Author: JPD


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-03-31 14:38:04
article submitted, a month or so rejectTo resubmitt, and gave the link, but also attached a response letter, the two reviewers raised almost ten questions, more professional, carefully revised after a month to re-upload, directly accepted after two and a half months, I am doing precious metal surfacePlasma, FDTD
Show Review in Original Language
(15) Thank | JPD

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-10 12:54:00
editing department processing speed is very fast, review speedAlso very quickly, the questions raised are very professional and difficult to answer.After the paper was overhauled, it will be accepted within three days after the submission.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-05 08:26:00
August on August 29, I received a file to transfer the copyright, and I always show that Manuscript Received really does not know when.Submitted for review, all week, slow! Manuscript Received
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-03 10:44:00
Date Task description Deadline date/Status 03/07/2013 Original manuscript to referee Report received 25/06/2013 Original manuscript to referee In progress 21/06/2013 Original manuscript to referee Unable to report21/06/2013 Origi
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service