JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B

Three weeks after submitting to JPCC, I received a minor repair notice. What I did is about a polymer porous material. Polymers should be submitted to JPCB, while porous materials can be submitted to JPCC. At that time, I felt that JPCC had a higher impact factor and then I submitted it to JPCC. As a result, the editor still felt that the direction  of the paper was more suitable for JPCB and then it was transferred to JPCB.

(1) Thank | yyfdemajia

The specific submission process was as follows: On October 5, the editor sent a reply regarding the manuscript. It was necessary to confirm the authorship. After a major revision, requiring re-examination, three questions were asked. A minor change was made so there was no need to re-examine the paper. We submitted the revised draft on December 17, and we received the deputy editor’s opinion on December 18.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

really good, old-fashioned journals.The editor is very serious and the reviewer is very professional.Received after three modifications.The journal proofreading is also very careful.

(3) Thank | Anonymous

Actually, JPCB is still very good. Although the article was first introduced to Chemistry of Materials, we accepted it and waited for two months to directly accept it. But the impact factor dropped by 5Point

(4) Thank | fhhbnu@gmail.com

Make changes after two months, return after one week, receive the next day, how much can IF be next year?

(1) Thank | Anonymous

4 selectd in the month, returned to review comments one month.Three reviewers, one receiving directly, one giving a change, and one rejecting the manuscript, were rejected by an Indian editor.JPCB has dropped very quickly in the past few years. The latest IF is 3.7. Now editing is more and more critical, and it is very important to theoretical calculations.I selectd for a thermodynamic experiment and a fitting article that was reviewed by the reviewers without exploring them at the molecular structure level.Later changed to AICHE to understand.It is recommended that the JPCB be tied to the theoretical calculations, which is more likely.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Online submission URL: https://acs.manuscriptcentral.com/acs

(0) Thank | Anonymous

IF:2006=4.115;2007=4.086;2008=4.189;2009=3.471;2010=3.603

(0) Thank | Anonymous

recently submitted an article, made up some experiments, received.The reviewer is very responsible, and the comments are very professional and helpful. The deputy is a Chinese. It feels good, although there is no direct contact.I hope that the next modification time can be given a little longer: on the 13th, I received a modification letter, I have to fill in the experiment, and I asked for a return draft before the 30th of the same month.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

recently received an article, the first time to select for 2 reviewers, one said no problem, one may be doing this, questioning the rejection, but the questions areVery pertinent, well-founded and convincing.I feel that the reviewer is very responsible.According to the review comments, the amendments were made. In particular, the questions raised by the reviewers who refused to submit the papers were answered with other literature support, and then received and accepted.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

18 Days said to be overhauled, changed after 30 days of submitment, accepted after 18 days.The proof is especially serious.It is a good journal.I feel that the last year is better, because the emergence of jpcc has diverted a lot of articles.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The first SCI, minor repair, reviewer did not put forward any professional advice, just the format and grammar errors, but the ACS correction work is very detailed, a lot of grammatical errors changed throughout

(0) Thank | Anonymous

JPCB Mainly look at the research group, some of the research groups themselves are JPCB professional households, because the consistency of natural rejection rate is relatively low.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

50 days to the message, return a review opinion that the article is inappropriate, no other substantive comments.It is recommended to change the colloid interface journal

(0) Thank | Anonymous

recently selectd one, returning one and a half months, one of the two reviewers' opinions was overhaul, and returned to retrial one month later, accepted after twenty days.Feeling speed is relatively fast

(0) Thank | Anonymous

JPCB The impact factor is obviously normal. The reason why the rapid increase in the past few years is to put on the side of materials and bio-heat, that is, relatively more people pay attention to it.Or directly related to the follow-up of chemical research.Nowadays, the material field needs not only synthesis, but also the reason why it is so structured and useful, which greatly reduces the number of follow-up researchers.It’s not so easy to get through the problem.These two directions turn back to rationality and increase requirements. Naturally, the era of rapid growth of related journal impact factors is over, and some will fall.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

is still a very good journal, and the previous influence factor is very high, and it is inseparable from its relationship.Many computational chemistry related to biomolecules such as P450 will consider this journal, of course, of course, jacs and angew can also be good.JPCB's direction in JPC is very clear, so it is easy to choose when you submit the manuscript, but as the upstairs said, acceptance becomes difficult. This is related to the journal's intention, and it is still changing, but it can't stop like this.The people of this journal are working hard, and there are also volumes out of difficulty. It is also a lot of articles, come on.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Impact factor explosion, this year's mad rejection.I want to contribute this year to be cautious ah

(0) Thank | Anonymous

old-fashioned journal, but the impact factor of 2009 talked so much, I really did not expect.However, the quality of recent articles is indeed not as good as in previous years. Many people have sent communication in other journals, and then come here to send the full text. The weight of the article is naturally lighter.

(1) Thank | Anonymous