X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B]Hello, you are Visitor Number 74193 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ PHYS CHEM B
ISSN1520-6106
E-ISSN1520-5207
h-index363
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.200.9430.962
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Surfaces, Coatings and Films
Q123 / 120
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Q242 / 162
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Materials Chemistry
Q144 / 287

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)9.70%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.acs.org/journal/jpcbfk
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://acs.manuscriptcentral.com/acs
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER CHEMICAL SOC, 1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20036
Subject AreaChemistry
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyWeekly
Year Publication Started1997
Annual Article Volume1088
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1520-6106%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.9 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 75%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B: Write a review
Author: yyfdemajia


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-01-14 15:14:35
Three weeks after submitting to JPCC, I received a minor repair notice. What I did is about a polymer porous material. Polymers should be submitted to JPCB, while porous materials can be submitted to JPCC. At that time, I felt that JPCC had a higher impact factor and then I submitted it to JPCC. As a result, the editor still felt that the direction  of the paper was more suitable for JPCB and then it was transferred to JPCB.

(1) Thank | yyfdemajia

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-27 12:42:00
The specific submission process was as follows: On October 5, the editor sent a reply regarding the manuscript. It was necessary to confirm the authorship. After a major revision, requiring re-examination, three questions were asked. A minor change was made so there was no need to re-examine the paper. We submitted the revised draft on December 17, and we received the deputy editor’s opinion on December 18.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-11 10:29:13
really good, old-fashioned journals.The editor is very serious and the reviewer is very professional.Received after three modifications.The journal proofreading is also very careful.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: fhhbnu@gmail.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-09-21 18:26:18
Actually, JPCB is still very good. Although the article was first introduced to Chemistry of Materials, we accepted it and waited for two months to directly accept it. But the impact factor dropped by 5Point
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | fhhbnu@gmail.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-22 09:36:00
Make changes after two months, return after one week, receive the next day, how much can IF be next year?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-09 17:08:00
4 selectd in the month, returned to review comments one month.Three reviewers, one receiving directly, one giving a change, and one rejecting the manuscript, were rejected by an Indian editor.JPCB has dropped very quickly in the past few years. The latest IF is 3.7. Now editing is more and more critical, and it is very important to theoretical calculations.I selectd for a thermodynamic experiment and a fitting article that was reviewed by the reviewers without exploring them at the molecular structure level.Later changed to AICHE to understand.It is recommended that the JPCB be tied to the theoretical calculations, which is more likely.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-19 20:19:00
Online submission URL: https://acs.manuscriptcentral.com/acs
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-05 11:38:00
IF:2006=4.115;2007=4.086;2008=4.189;2009=3.471;2010=3.603
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-31 15:08:00
recently submitted an article, made up some experiments, received.The reviewer is very responsible, and the comments are very professional and helpful. The deputy is a Chinese. It feels good, although there is no direct contact.I hope that the next modification time can be given a little longer: on the 13th, I received a modification letter, I have to fill in the experiment, and I asked for a return draft before the 30th of the same month.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-10 17:31:00
recently received an article, the first time to select for 2 reviewers, one said no problem, one may be doing this, questioning the rejection, but the questions areVery pertinent, well-founded and convincing.I feel that the reviewer is very responsible.According to the review comments, the amendments were made. In particular, the questions raised by the reviewers who refused to submit the papers were answered with other literature support, and then received and accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-22 22:20:00
18 Days said to be overhauled, changed after 30 days of submitment, accepted after 18 days.The proof is especially serious.It is a good journal.I feel that the last year is better, because the emergence of jpcc has diverted a lot of articles.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-17 18:11:00
The first SCI, minor repair, reviewer did not put forward any professional advice, just the format and grammar errors, but the ACS correction work is very detailed, a lot of grammatical errors changed throughout
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-28 16:12:00
JPCB Mainly look at the research group, some of the research groups themselves are JPCB professional households, because the consistency of natural rejection rate is relatively low.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-22 23:04:00
50 days to the message, return a review opinion that the article is inappropriate, no other substantive comments.It is recommended to change the colloid interface journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-04-27 15:16:00
recently selectd one, returning one and a half months, one of the two reviewers' opinions was overhaul, and returned to retrial one month later, accepted after twenty days.Feeling speed is relatively fast
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-03-20 17:13:00
JPCB The impact factor is obviously normal. The reason why the rapid increase in the past few years is to put on the side of materials and bio-heat, that is, relatively more people pay attention to it.Or directly related to the follow-up of chemical research.Nowadays, the material field needs not only synthesis, but also the reason why it is so structured and useful, which greatly reduces the number of follow-up researchers.It’s not so easy to get through the problem.These two directions turn back to rationality and increase requirements. Naturally, the era of rapid growth of related journal impact factors is over, and some will fall.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-01-08 10:08:00
is still a very good journal, and the previous influence factor is very high, and it is inseparable from its relationship.Many computational chemistry related to biomolecules such as P450 will consider this journal, of course, of course, jacs and angew can also be good.JPCB's direction in JPC is very clear, so it is easy to choose when you submit the manuscript, but as the upstairs said, acceptance becomes difficult. This is related to the journal's intention, and it is still changing, but it can't stop like this.The people of this journal are working hard, and there are also volumes out of difficulty. It is also a lot of articles, come on.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-10-07 11:07:00
Impact factor explosion, this year's mad rejection.I want to contribute this year to be cautious ah
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 自组装
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-26 18:40:00
old-fashioned journal, but the impact factor of 2009 talked so much, I really did not expect.However, the quality of recent articles is indeed not as good as in previous years. Many people have sent communication in other journals, and then come here to send the full text. The weight of the article is naturally lighter.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 软物质
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-16 14:00:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service