X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 292157 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ HAZARD MATER
ISSN0304-3894
h-index235
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
13.102.0102.159
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Engineering
Q13 / 132
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
Q15 / 128
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Environmental Chemistry
Q16 / 115
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Waste Management and Disposal
Q13 / 100
Category: Environmental Science
Subcategory: Pollution
Q15 / 120

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)6.30%
Official Websitehttp://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-hazardous-materials/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/HAZMAT
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1975
Annual Article Volume1262
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0304-3894%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.1 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 8.1 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 73%
Data from Elsevier: 16%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/9)
  Reviews on JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Write a review
Author: 瞄准小灰灰


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-02-17 10:46:52
Research direction: Microbial salt tolerance mechanism, editor: Gerasimos Lyberatos, PhD. The manuscript processing efficiency is very fast. Number of reviewers: 2. The submission status is as follows: Dec 18, 2019, submitted to journal; Dec 19, 2019, with editor; Dec 19, 2019, under review; Jan 15, 2020, under editor evaluation; Jan 16, 2020, major revision; Jan 30, 2020, revision submitted to journal; Jan 31, 2020, with editor; Feb 1, 2020, under review; Feb 15, 2020, major revision; Feb 15, 2020, Accept. In fact, this JHM has been promoted to a comprehensive journal in recent years, and the content received is relatively wide. There are relatively few professional reviewers in the slightly related field, so the problem raised is not difficult. The requirement was mainly for the format. A Graphical Abstract is mandatory, so you must draw it before submitting the manuscript. The second major revision was to modify the picture, and then we returned it in the afternoon and it was accepted in the evening. Overall, it is relatively fast.

(6) Thank | 瞄准小灰灰

Author: 九品鬼差


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-09-04 08:51:08
Jul 15, 2019 Submitted to Journal. Jul 15, 2019 With editor. Jul 15, 2019 Under review. Jul 16, 2019 Under review. Jul 17, 2019 Under review. Jul 27, 2019 Under editor evaluation. Jul 27, 2019 Under review. Aug 05, 2019 Major Revision. Aug 21, 2019 Revision Submitted to Journal. Aug 21, 2019 With editor. Aug 21, 2019 Under review. Aug 28, 2019 Under review. Sep 01, 2019 Minor Revision. Sep 02, 2019 Revision Submitted to Journal. Sep 02, 2019 With editor. Sep 03, 2019 Accept. The one-month review stage was abolished. Six reviewers in total. Thank Daniel CW Tsang.

(4) Thank | 九品鬼差

Author: 天问


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-06-25 10:17:13
When searching the news today, I was shocked by the news that “The world lost Professor Joo-Hwa Tay, and the paradise add one more water expert." He was the editor of the Journal of Hazardous Materials. JHM is a great journal in the environmental field. I became familiar with Joo-Hwa Tay because of my two articles. In 2014, the first JHM article I published during my master’s degree was handled by Professor Joo-Hwa Tay. It was finally accepted after revision, so I thought JHM and Professor Tay were great and I had a good start in scientific research. During my Ph.D. in 2019, I submitted another article, which was still handled by Professor Joo-Hwa Tay. The process from with editor to under review was very fast, indicating that the professor handled the article very quickly (JHM is mainly slow in the preliminary review). I received review comments which requested minor revisions on June 9th, and returned the revised submission on June 12th. I thought it would be accepted the next day because it would not be sent for review after minor revisions. However, until June 22, the time with editor changed once. At that time, I guessed whether the professor was sick, or else it would be handled soon. The next day, June 23, my article was accepted and it was already processed by another editor (Danmong Shuai). Generally speaking, the editor would not be changed in processing revised manuscript. Today I felt so sad to see the news of the professor's death. I felt it was out of sudden and the affairs of the world are inconstant.

(44) Thank | 天问

Author: yudeyou


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-28 10:16:27
My article was finally accepted by JHM. In fact, this article had been rejected by ACB, EST, WR, JC, and CEJ. Timeline: I submitted in July, and in August the editors wrote that the article did not pass the second round of technical review because the duplication rate was too high with an overall (including references) duplication score of 36%, and the single source, 2%. I reduced it to 25%, and when the the references were excluded, it the duplication score was only 12%. I resubmitted it, and in September the reviews asked for revision. I revised it and then it was sent to different reviewers. I was asked for minor revisions. The article was accepted in December.

(7) Thank | yudeyou

Author: 会飞的


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-12 14:50:28
2018.10.01 submit to journal2018.10.23 under review date changes,2018.11.03 under review date change,2018.11.21 under review date change,2018.12.14 major revision, opinions are ok2018.01.05-08 Rework was returned to modify highlight twice2018.01.11 under review2018.01.23 under review date change,2018.02.01 under review date change,2018.02.12 still no messageReally slow.......The last one was sent for less than half a day, and I received it...好尴尬
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | 会飞的

Author: 会飞的


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-12 06:23:52
2018.10.01 submit to journal2018.10.23 under review date changes,2018.11.03 under review date change,2018.11.21 under review date change,2018.12.14 major revision, opinions are ok2018.01.05-08 Rework was returned to modify highlight twice2018.01.11 under review2018.01.23 under review date change,2018.02.01 under review date change,2018.02.12 still no messageReally slow....
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 会飞的

Author: memory


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-22 01:25:52
8.14 submitted to the journal9.4 under review12.29 minor revision, require proofread by a native English speakerSubmitted by 1.191.21 acceptIf you have confidence, don't push the draft, just wait.Don't have the confidence to hurry up and don't wait.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | memory

Author: 会飞的


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-21 22:54:23
journal of hazardous materials2018.10.01 submit to journal2018.10.23. under review2018.11.03. under review2018.11.21. under review2018.12.14 major revision, opinions are ok2018.01.08 Revised under review2018.01.23 under review date change, it should be rejected by reviewers, and re-reviewersI hope I can have good results, worry...
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 会飞的

Author: Chris


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-28 15:54:00
Help, under editor evaluation 18 days still no results, normal?Share my process2018.10.15 submitted to journal2018.11.07 with editor2018.11.18 under review2018.12.10 under editor evaluation No news so farThe front is quite smooth, waiting for the editor to decide that it is really a bit tough, can you draft?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Chris

Author: Tise


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-17 14:37:33
Submitted at the end of September,More than 20 days of format review,After more than 20 days of reviewing the draft,Overhaul opinions in mid-November,Revised at the beginning of December,Received in mid-December.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Tise

Author: lafinner


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-15 12:54:20
8.1 submit to journal9.2 There is a problem with the middle cover letter, wait a month... Submit to journal again10.4 under review12.1 minor revision12.9 revisions sent back12.15 acceptIt’s been a long time...and many of them said that there was news one month after under review... I almost waited for two months... before submit to journal for a full month... anxiously cautious, but in the middleEverything is worth it~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | lafinner

Author: 爬虫


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-13 10:41:20
The direction of the material was made. There was no news in the past. After more than a month, I edited an email and asked to modify the re-submitment.After re-submitment, I gave an opinion after reviewing the manuscript, and then submitted the offer!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 爬虫

Author: 吴妮妮


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-13 21:53:45
Speaking of it, it hurts.6.27 Submission7.29 Under review8.9 Under review8.29 I was notified that I have not found a reviewer.9.14 Recommended Reviewer, Under review10.22 Editing Evaluation11.9 RejectionAfter more than 4 months, I finally refused the manuscript, and there were only 2 reviewers. The first reviewer should be a suggestion to reject the manuscript. There are several questions. The second reviewer should be revised.4 small questions.The result was heartbreaking, and it took 17 days to make a decision in the editor's hands. The whole process was nearly five months.It is recommended that if you are rushing to graduate, you want to select for the journal.Think twice!Think twice!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 吴妮妮

Author: hiter


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-04 09:37:51
7.21 Submission8.12 under review9.17 Zhong Xiu10.04 Repair10.31 minor repair11.2 acceptEditor Joo Hwa Tay is very diligent
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | hiter

Author: yudeyou


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-31 09:19:19
The first-instance 20-day overhaul, the second trial has been 22 days and still under review, a little anxious...哎
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | yudeyou

Author: 命名烦死人


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-19 21:14:02
The contents of the energetic materials made.The manuscript was reviewed for half a month, and the review was quick, about 20 days.The two reviewers are minor repairs.However, several questions raised in the middle are still very professional, and they have also made progress by studying the problem.After the minor repair, I selectd again and accepted it the next day.I hope the journal is getting better and better!(Export an egg: Brother said that this journal should not remind editors)Submission on August 17Review on September 6thReturn to opinion on September 27 (small repair)Submission on October 15thOn October 16th accepted (accept)
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | 命名烦死人

Author: scisjh


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-18 21:41:02
It was pressed for a month in the editor's hand, and then the out of scope was rejected..Really very slow
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | scisjh

Author: 贪吃的饼饼


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-10 16:46:10
For the environmental direction, after submitting CES, two of the three reviewers gave minor repairs, and one gave the proposal to Langmuir. I don’t know why the editor refused to submit the manuscript.After the format was revised, it was submitted for the first time at the end of December 2017;After the one-month technical review, the number of positive texts was reduced, and the manuscript was resubmitted at the end of January 2018;On June 18, 2018, he received an overhaul notice, totaling 6 reviewers, one minor repair, four overhauls, and one suggestion rejection;Part of the supplementary mechanism is submitted on July 16, 2018;On August 22, 2018, the overhaul notice was received again, totaling 3 reviewers, two minor repairs, and one overhaul (recommendation to strengthen the mechanism part again);Resubmit the part of the mechanism and submit it again on September 7, 2018;Received on October 9, 2018.The result is good, but the process is too painful, some reviewers have the suspicion of deliberate martyrdom, and the review period is too long (very close to 10 months).Simply don't hurry, don't recommend scholars who are graduating to contribute.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 贪吃的饼饼

Author: 第一楼


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-27 11:43:48
2018.09.26Submission
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 第一楼

Author: troy


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-25 20:24:18
Submitted catalysis BThe deputy editor has been transferred to the journal of hazardous materials. Now it is a month, or submitted to journal, it feels really slow.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | troy

Author: 夜月嗜血猫


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-24 15:32:06
When you submitted the manuscript, did the date of Under Review change?My Under review has changed three times....What is the situation?....
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 夜月嗜血猫

Author: yudeyou


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-20 08:37:35
In addition to the slower initial review speed, the first trial speed is really fast, only 20 days, now has Under Editor Evaluation, hope good results!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | yudeyou

Author: 夜月嗜血猫


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-19 20:35:13
This journal will only assign a number after the trial..It is not assigned during the format review phase and is not the same as other journals.Moreover, if you are in a hurry, it is not recommended to select for this..Because the speed is really slow...Format review generally takes at least a month and then waits for a review or other..
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 夜月嗜血猫

Author: migrant


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-11 15:46:25
194th floorAuthor: 917836173@qq.com, landlord AC Kazakhstan.When you said the formal review, did the editor assign the number to the manuscript?Also, do you recommend reviewers when submitting articles?I did not recommend a reviewer at all when I submitted the manuscript.Now more than 10 days, the manuscript has not been assigned a number.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | migrant

Author: 917836173@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-10 22:28:50
within three weeks Overall, the time is slow...One month format review, one month later, and now under review..Wait, then...I feel that if you are in a hurry, don't consider this journal...Generally speaking, the technical review is about one month, and the first trial is about one month...wait....
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 917836173@qq.com

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/9)

Start your review of [JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service