ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

solid polymer electrolyte, reviewing for one month,One reviewer agreed that the two disagreed and was rejected.The editor is good.

(1) Thank | fjfshu@shu.edu.cn

3.21Submission3.24 Deputy Editor4.19 review review comments, three minor repairs, a major repairRepair No. 5.5In principle, No. 5.6 is received, and the reference format needs to be modified.Reviewers and editors are very good!

(169) Thank | lishuangjian114@163.com

3.213.24 Deputy Editor4.19 review review comments, three minor repairs, a major repairRepair No. 5.5In principle, No. 5.6 is received, and the reference format needs to be modified.Reviewers and editors are very good!

(1) Thank | lishuangjian114@163.com

is quickly rejected, I don't know how everyone is...

(2) Thank | 乐乐

returns to a major repair for the first time, a minor repair, edit willing to consider a revised version pending a second round of external review; the results of the second revision select, the editor did not give reviewWhen people look at it, they refuse to do so. Chinese editors feel very keng because the language is rejected.

(3) Thank | cutewangzehong@163.com

1.5 Monthly results, one minor repair, two overhaulsRevised back in two weeksThree weeks later,

(6) Thank | xxl

12 on the 20th,The review comments were received on February 7 of the following year, and two major reforms were made to the revised version pending a second round of external review.On February 20th, the revised draft was submitted, and a large picture was added.On April 4th, the revised second draft was submitted.On April 7th, I received

(0) Thank | xiaolang

12No. 20 submission,The review comments were received on February 7 of the following year, and two major reforms were made to the revised version pending a second round of external review.On February 20th, the revised draft was submitted, and a large picture was added.On April 4th, the revised second draft was submitted.On April 7th, I received

(1) Thank | yangshan1223@msn.cn

May I ask the students on the fifth floor, can you ask a few questions?Can you leave a contact method?

(0) Thank | 472256060@qq.com

See acs applied materials

(2) Thank | cjd

1.20 at night.2.14 Return to the review comments, two small repairs, edit to overhaul, three weeks to modify the timeNo. 3.8 submitted the revised draft, 3.9 check the weight of 31% for modification (the Tucao under the Taobao check the weight... the result is a little bit worse)3.13 Return comments After receiving the format picture, you do not need to modify the direct reply mail.3.14 submission Received at night3.15 onlineThe efficiency is amazing

(3) Thank | allenyan

1月19日稿Return to revised version on February 26Received on March 2March 9 PROOF

(3) Thank | wangbin_01@yeah.net

1.11 submission.Return to 2.14, overhaulNo. 3.6, received.The editor was very good. In less than two months, the first article was successfully received.I hope the journal is getting better and better.

(3) Thank | 1083044060@qq.com

This article has been selectd on jacs and cs, respectively, tragedy, transferred to AMI, 40 days in the first trial, four experts, three minor repairs, one rejection (can be seen, this expert is usThe work negated the conclusions of his previous article published on NC), the editor fahar gave the revised re-submitment, revised and then selectd, the second trial for 35 days, only one expert opinion, rejected the draft (or the last rejected expert)Mainly said that our work is not innovative.I wrote a letter of appeal to the editor. The editor was very good. I agreed to let us re-submit in it. So I re-submited again. The third trial was 20 days and I accepted it directly.I feel that the editor of AIM is responsible, I hope that the AMI will be better and better.

(3) Thank | cjd

20161121 Submission20161229 Received comments on review, three reviewers, one overhaul, one minor repair, one direct accept20170118 Modified return, no supplementary experiment, mainly modified the format error, and improved the quality of the map20170214 Accepted, it may be a Chinese New Year, the efficiency of returning the modification is relatively low, the only fly in the ointmentFeeling: The editor is awesome. I even misunderstood the AMI abbreviation. I patiently pointed out many small errors in my format and felt very tolerant to the author.Personally feel that AMI's article workload must be large enough, can not be general, it is best to be able to copy your point of view, in contrast, the innovative requirements for work is not as high as JMCA.As the first paper in the graduate study phase, AMI, you deserve it!

(5) Thank | thisistrue@126.com

after submissionAbout 28 days to get the review news, the review speed is very fast, 4 reviewers have a total of 20 questions, 3 minor repairs and overhauls, edits to minor repairs, the problems are more savvy.I didn't make up the experiment. I returned it 5 days after I received it. I received it in two days. In total, it took about 35 days from submission to reception. I feel that the editors and reviewers are very good.

(2) Thank | cocoa518

September 19 submission, returning review comments on November 8th, almost 50 days.Two reviewers, one minor repair and one rejection, the editorial opinions were more positive, and the opinions were overhauled.Give the 20-day period, repair it back on November 18, check the return and change it on the 23rd, and return to the place where the change is clearly indicated on the 30th, and receive it on December 8.Generally, if the check is heavy, it will be basically received.

(0) Thank | Gan

September 30th contribution;Assign an editor on October 3;Return to the review comments around November 10 and change the time in two weeks.Two minor repairs, the editor hopes to reply to the revised version soon;Return to reply on November 13th.Only answered some questions and did not complete the experiment;Received on November 16;Overall, the efficiency is very high, share it for your reference.

(0) Thank | hz

18 Received two minor repair opinions, and checked back 32% after the return, and returned to the 5 days for the modification!

(13) Thank | flute

2016/08/31 Submission2016/09/01 Go to the Associate Editor2016/10/05 Reply, 3 reviewers, two major repairs, a minor repair.2016/10/12 RevisedIt has been a month since I returned to the present. I have no news yet, I hope I can have good news.

(3) Thank | jeffrey

7.18Submission8.30 first trial, four reviewers, editor to overhaul9.14 upload overhaulSecond trial of No. 10.4, minor repair10.14 minor repair againAccepted on No. 10.28The overall situation was fairly smooth, and the reviewers and editors were very professional and serious, and they helped the article.I sincerely hope that ACSAMI will be better and better!

(3) Thank | 331

Very good potential journals, submitted for one month, two major repairs, changed to 20 days, returned to the next day to receive and access the Internet, high efficiency, more comprehensive review, conscience journal, worth atest!

(0) Thank | handiniupai

Submitted for one month, two reviewers, one minor repair, one rejected, the reviewer gave a rejection, said that the novelty is not enough, depressed

(0) Thank | 1373377972@qq.com

Overhaul returned more than a month, still no news, how has this journal changed so slowly?

(2) Thank | 位

7月28#SubmissionDeputy Editor-in-Chief, August 3Returning comments on September 19, two minor repairsSubmit a reply on September 25thOctober 3 acceptOctober 6 proofThe overall situation is very smooth.Editors and reviewers are very helpful.I hope this journal will be better and better!

(12) Thank | Todd