X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces]Hello, you are Visitor Number 655019 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Journal Title AbbreviationsACS APPL MATER INTER
ISSN1944-8244
E-ISSN1944-8252
h-index169
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
13.602.5681.568
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Materials Science
Q123 / 460

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)7.80%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.acs.org/journal/aamick
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://acs.manuscriptcentral.com/acs
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER CHEMICAL SOC, 1155 16TH ST, NW, WASHINGTON, USA, DC, 20036
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started2009
Annual Article Volume5181
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1944-8244%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.9 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 78%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/9)
  Reviews on ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces: Write a review
Author: 13哥


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-25 08:23:57
Submitted on May 18th23rd to editReturn to overhaul on June 21, one direct reception, one minor repair, one recommended overhaulJuly 10th, supplement experimental data backOn August 7th, the second reviewer agreed to receive, and the third reviewer still seized a previous question and the editor asked to continue the repair.On August 15th, a large number of documents were cited to illustrate the problem.On August 21st, the editor wrote a letter saying that he was satisfied with the reply and estimated that he did not return to the reviewer.Change the titleReceived on August 24th.Throughout the three months, reviewers also have their own understanding and patience.In particular, under the premise of a large amount of literature support, my position should be firm and believe in one's own things.Thank you very much for editing, very nice, the rhythm is right.Thanks again.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 13哥

Author: 9300698601


Subject Area: Multidisciplinary
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-21 09:20:30
Speed ​​is pretty fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 9300698601

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-08 09:45:09
No good submitment in previous years
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: phd candidate


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-02 16:38:37
Feel very efficient,Very professional.Submitted on the third day after submission, review comments after about 25 days; receive directly after 10 days of repair, receive onlie on the same day; proof again, very fast.It feels good.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | phd candidate

Author: Holmes


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-30 20:59:55
2018.5.13Submission5.18 Assignment Editor6.27 Review comments, two reviewers gave praise to minor repairs, edited to overhaul, 21 days7.13 repair7.26 Technical review, modification of format7.27 Resubmit the copyright agreementAccepted on 7.30I wish AMI is getting better and better!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Holmes

Author: 小果丁


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-24 17:12:17
5.23 Submission5.28 Deputy Editor-in-Chief7.6 Review comments are returned, two major one minor repairs, 20 revision time,7.20 Super serious revision, and make up a lot of data, submit a revised draft,7.24 Direct acceptanceWaiting for proof
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 小果丁

Author: tomorrow


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-23 13:59:25
After being rejected by AM on May 23, I submitted amiThe day was returned (there is a problem with the format), and resubmitted after the change.On May 27th, the article was distributed to the editor.On July 3, I received the review comments (two major revisions, one minor repair. The three reviewers rated the article very high).Submit again on July 13thOn July 15th, the editor directly received (no 2 external trials)
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | tomorrow

Author: 小果丁


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-23 09:06:26
Is there a second external audit on the upper floor?
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 小果丁

Author: 602729204@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-16 16:20:55
2018-04-26 Submission2018-04-28 Assignment Editor2018-05-22 Received review comments (two big and one small, given 20 days to modify)2018-06-14 Return to the revised draft2018-07-09 receivingIn general, it is still relatively fast, the editor is very helpful, and the questions raised by the reviewers are also very pertinent. I wish the journals will be better and better.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 602729204@qq.com

Author: 剑天涯


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-11 23:00:29
6.22 Submission. 6.25 to the deputy editor, 7.10 reply to the review comments, two reviewers, a major repair, a rejection, the editor gave the rejection, the review speed is still very fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 剑天涯

Author: 707145297@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-11 19:40:45
Submitted at the end of February, submitted for review in mid-MarchAt the beginning of June, the editor has been under editor evaluation. At the end of June, he was informed of the minor repair. After the change, he was directly received after one week with the editor.In general, the speed of review is ok, and the time for the journal to reviewers is about one month.My first SCI, although I don't understand it, but I finally acceptd it. You need to analyze the experience and add 725,554,986 to learn from each other, discuss and share the submission experience and problems.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 707145297@qq.com

Author: 707145297@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-11 17:56:53
The reviewer is very responsible, reviewing the draft quickly, overhauling it, and directly hiring it after minor repairs.Still very lucky to submitted the first draft.Ha ha...Go ahead, come on!Share it together: 725554986
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 707145297@qq.com

Author: 707145297@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-11 16:29:50
Submitted at the end of February, submitted for review in mid-March, and reviewed in early June. Under the end of June, I told Xiaoxiu to change it back to the editor for a week.In general, the speed of review is ok, and the time for the journal to reviewers is about one month.My first SCI, experienced bumps, countless jumps, plus group 725,554,986, discuss and share the submission experience and problems.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 707145297@qq.com

Author: 行者


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-11 15:34:46
2017/7/20, the first submission.2017/10/15, one for overhaul, two for minor repair, ecstatic slowly change.2017/11/7, revised.2017/11/13 Hire.The first time the submission was rough, I didn't understand it. I took a lot of detours and built a group of 725,554,986.Communicate with each other and make progress together.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 行者

Author: vivid1224


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-08 14:54:59
3.22 Submission3.28 allocation editing4.24. Overhaul, three reviewers5.14 Submitting a revised draft5.17 Direct rejection of the draft, check the weight has not passed.5.23 submitted revised to re-submit with new draft5.276.27 revision requested overhaul, two reviewers7.1 revision submitted7.6 acceptedReview comments need to be answered carefully, which is very helpful for improving the quality of the article. The editorial evaluation is indeed very important.Finally, I sincerely thank the editors and the reviewers for their help.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | vivid1224

Author: wx-song@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-07 14:02:21
5.8 submitted5.11 assigned to Editor6.13 Revision Requested Two major revise, one reject.The editor gave major revise, 21 days to modify the time6.30 Submit a large number of experiments and mechanisms and submit again7.3 Received a message to modify technical issues7.5 acceptThe efficiency of editing is very high and the recognition of the editor is very important
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | wx-song@qq.com

Author: 183wyg


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-06 11:24:12
April 27 contributionMay 1 reviewMay 29 return comments, two major repairs, a minor repair, edit to overhaul, 20 days returnReturned on June 19thReady to receive on June 26, need to change the formatReturned to June 28Received on June 29Now wait for proof
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 183wyg

Author: ypfeng14b@imr.ac.cn


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-04 12:52:51
2018.05.08 Submission.2018.06.06 returned the review comments, a minor repair, a rejection (the opinion is very negative, very worried), the editor gave a major repair, pending a second round of external review.2018.06.22 Answer each question carefully, then return to the revised draft, did not complete the experiment.Accepted by 2018.07.04To sum up, the editor's opinion is very important, and the revision can be made.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ypfeng14b@imr.ac.cn

Author: 2386695115@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-29 11:04:59
4.1 submission5.7 Three reviewers, two minor repairs received directly, did not require experimental data, but only the details were modified.5.17 Uploading a revised draft6.7 Receiving6.20 proof
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 2386695115@qq.com

Author: 2386695115@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-29 11:04:35
4.15.7 Three reviewers, two minor repairs received directly, did not require experimental data, but only the details were modified.5.17 Uploading a revised draft6.7 Receiving6.20 proof
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 2386695115@qq.com

Author: MLY


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-16 14:44:36
4.13 Submission4.21 Assignment Editing Yu-Guoguo5.15 Two reviewers, one overhauled a minor repair, edited to overhaul, returned within 21 days5.30 Returning a manuscript6.07 Modifying the technical problem is the format problem6.08 Return to manuscript6.14 Receiving
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | MLY

Author: MLY


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-16 14:44:29
4.13 Submission4.21 Assignment Editing Yu-Guoguo5.15 Two reviewers, one overhauled a minor repair, edited to overhaul, returned within 21 days5.30 Returning a manuscript6.07 Modifying the technical problem is the format problem6.08 Return to manuscript6.14 Receiving
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | MLY

Author: jkl


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-13 12:13:35
January 25 contributionOn the evening of April 10, three reviewers received a small repair and one suggestion was not published. But seven questions were raised and the editor gave a major overhaul.On April 25th, the supplementary experiment (the third reviewer's opinion) returned to the revised draft.On May 28th, I received the review comments. Minor repairs and disapproval of consent, as well as a reviewer Xiao Xiu suggested supplementing the experiment.Submitted for revision on June 7On June 11th, I received the review comments. Technically minor issues, I will return the revised draft on the same day.Received on June 12
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | jkl

Author: none


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-13 09:47:47
Edit direct rejection, the reason is not enough innovation
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | none

Author: ypfeng14b@imr.ac.cn


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-07 08:51:49
I would like to ask, is it a three-week modification time for minor repairs or overhauls?What is the probability of the final overhaul?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ypfeng14b@imr.ac.cn

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/9)

Start your review of [ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service