JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY

The manuscript was submitted on October 15 this year. The reply was received on the next day, and original data was required to supply. The other party pestered me for a week on the grounds that the dyeing background was too low and the tubulin strip had no background. My boss was pissed off and wanted to withdraw the manuscript. Fortunately, associate editor assigned it on October 26, and revision was required on November 26. There were 2 reviewers, one of them positively affirmed the meaning of our work, and the other one gave many valuable comments and requested me to make major revision. However, the editor chose to reject it and did not give the reason for the rejection. Summary: The submission experience was extremely bad. The image review department was totally unprofessional. The review comments were very professional and benefitted a lot. My work will be more perfect. However, the editor rejected the manuscript without reason and I will not submit to Journal of Biological Chemistry in the future.

(9) Thank | ritsu

The review speed is relatively fast, and the review is very strict. Mechanisms required. The quality of the articles is relatively high.

(37) Thank | lodjlwhu@sina.com

This is the second article of my master's degree, and the process is quite smooth.Submitted in February, received the editor's mail within 20 days, the opinions of the two reviewers are not bad, but need to make up more experiments to improve.I made up for the second submission at the end of May, and I received an editorial email today, saying that I received it!I have to say that JBC is working very fast!In the same day, I was in Press.Although JBC's IF has been falling in recent years, it is indeed a classic journal in our hearts, which is recognized by the industry!I can't select for it, I won't select for other journals with 5 or 6 points.I hope to continue working hard in the future!More than a big article ~

(8) Thank | 豆虫

was originally submited in JBMR and HMG in our field, but the transgenic mice used were reported to be non-specific this year, and experts in the bone field said it was unacceptable.Changed to JCS, refused to draft, reason they only play cell biology.Later, he submitted to JBC under the advice of his mentor and peers.After submitting the manuscript for review, the model was re-submitted after 1 month.I thought that there was no drama. After carefully reviewing all the reviewers' requests for experiments in September, and carefully replying to them, JBC received less than 4 days to receive the test...Happiness comes too suddenly...I didn't consider those "junk journals" in the whole process, I would rather not select for them.After receiving many biochemical field friends, I would like to express my warm congratulations. They all say that this journal is absolutely suitable for the first SCI

(4) Thank | wu3248

Not as fast as I thought, I have repaired it 3 times, but I am receiving it.

(1) Thank | bio

very old journals,More beautiful research work has been published above.Our lab prefers this journal, and the adequacy of the data is very important.

(1) Thank | cell2

finally saw the same editing and reviewing efficiency of JBC God. The teacher gave under review 3 hours after submitting the manuscript, and gave the review comments in three days.But was rejected...Both reviewers said that the reaction process that has been clarified by the mechanism is not in line with the positioning of the journal, and is ready to be changed~~~

(2) Thank | Anonymous

In terms of bias mechanism, if there is no in-depth mechanism research, it will be rejected, but the journal is highly efficient. Three reviewers are given three-week review opinions, and one of them is up to 3The comments of the page, however, the other two reviewers directly pointed out the key points of the article: only the interpretation of the phenomenon, there is no research on the relevant mechanism

(2) Thank | Anonymous

Fang Zhouzi published an article journal, belonging to the top journal,Due to the large base of the article, the impact factor is not high, but the recognized status is high.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

In June of this year, I selectd for a small repair after 3 weeks, and received it immediately after the repair.Personal feeling JBC is biased towards the mechanism explanation of biological phenomena. If the article has some new ideas, it is recommended to select for this journal

(1) Thank | Anonymous

professional old journals in biochemistry, which is more difficult.The review is relatively fast, and if the quality of the manuscript is guaranteed, it usually responds within one month.The number of articles sent in the year is 3761, the weekly journal, the number of articles is really much.Although the impact factor is not too high, JBC is the mainstream journal in the American academic system.With related articles, you can first consider submitting JBC.

(0) Thank | Anonymous