Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | J BIOL CHEM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0021-9258 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1083-351X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 477 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 4.80% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://www.jbc.org/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://submit.jbc.org/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC, 9650 ROCKVILLE PIKE, BETHESDA, USA, MD, 20814-3996 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Biology | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Weekly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 1566 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0021-9258%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 1.7 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 38.82% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY: | Write a review |
Author: lodjlwhu@sina.com Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-08-06 16:01:52 The review speed is relatively fast, and the review is very strict. Mechanisms required. The quality of the articles is relatively high. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 豆虫 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-06-06 15:48:33 This is the second article of my master's degree, and the process is quite smooth.Submitted in February, received the editor's mail within 20 days, the opinions of the two reviewers are not bad, but need to make up more experiments to improve.I made up for the second submission at the end of May, and I received an editorial email today, saying that I received it!I have to say that JBC is working very fast!In the same day, I was in Press.Although JBC's IF has been falling in recent years, it is indeed a classic journal in our hearts, which is recognized by the industry!I can't select for it, I won't select for other journals with 5 or 6 points.I hope to continue working hard in the future!More than a big article ~ ![]() ![]() |
Author: wu3248 Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-10-08 03:32:16 was originally submited in JBMR and HMG in our field, but the transgenic mice used were reported to be non-specific this year, and experts in the bone field said it was unacceptable.Changed to JCS, refused to draft, reason they only play cell biology.Later, he submitted to JBC under the advice of his mentor and peers.After submitting the manuscript for review, the model was re-submitted after 1 month.I thought that there was no drama. After carefully reviewing all the reviewers' requests for experiments in September, and carefully replying to them, JBC received less than 4 days to receive the test...Happiness comes too suddenly...I didn't consider those "junk journals" in the whole process, I would rather not select for them.After receiving many biochemical field friends, I would like to express my warm congratulations. They all say that this journal is absolutely suitable for the first SCI ![]() ![]() |
Author: bio Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-07-26 10:41:30 Not as fast as I thought, I have repaired it 3 times, but I am receiving it. ![]() ![]() |
Author: cell2 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2014-05-29 10:22:13 very old journals,More beautiful research work has been published above.Our lab prefers this journal, and the adequacy of the data is very important. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-01-12 16:15:00 finally saw the same editing and reviewing efficiency of JBC God. The teacher gave under review 3 hours after submitting the manuscript, and gave the review comments in three days.But was rejected...Both reviewers said that the reaction process that has been clarified by the mechanism is not in line with the positioning of the journal, and is ready to be changed~~~ ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-10-21 15:17:00 In terms of bias mechanism, if there is no in-depth mechanism research, it will be rejected, but the journal is highly efficient. Three reviewers are given three-week review opinions, and one of them is up to 3The comments of the page, however, the other two reviewers directly pointed out the key points of the article: only the interpretation of the phenomenon, there is no research on the relevant mechanism ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-08-09 00:06:00 Fang Zhouzi published an article journal, belonging to the top journal,Due to the large base of the article, the impact factor is not high, but the recognized status is high. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-11-06 05:18:00 In June of this year, I selectd for a small repair after 3 weeks, and received it immediately after the repair.Personal feeling JBC is biased towards the mechanism explanation of biological phenomena. If the article has some new ideas, it is recommended to select for this journal ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-07-17 11:42:00 professional old journals in biochemistry, which is more difficult.The review is relatively fast, and if the quality of the manuscript is guaranteed, it usually responds within one month.The number of articles sent in the year is 3761, the weekly journal, the number of articles is really much.Although the impact factor is not too high, JBC is the mainstream journal in the American academic system.With related articles, you can first consider submitting JBC. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |