JOURNAL OF ASIAN EARTH SCIENCES

1. It was returned in a week for the format issues after submission. It was resubmitted after revision. 2. It was submitted, and sent for review after a-week with editor. And the review comments returned in two weeks, major revision was required. The comments of editor returned in a week after submitting the revision, minor revision was required. Only highlight issues were left in this step, and there was no need to edit the text. It was accepted in 2 hours after submitting the minor revision.

(4) Thank | Rlockeri

1. It was returned in a week for the format issues after submission. It was resubmitted after revision. 2. It was submitted, and sent for review after a-week with editor. And the review comments returned in two weeks, major revision was required. The comments of editor returned in a week after submitting the revision, minor revision was required. Only highlight issues were left in this step, and there was no need to edit the text. It was accepted in 2 hours after submitting the minor revision.

(0) Thank | Rlockeri

After being rejected once, I revised according to the reviewer's opinion. The second submission was made, and the review speed was very fast. It came back one month later. It was relatively smooth.

(3) Thank | 我就喜欢

My with editor is 10 days, has not changed

(0) Thank | zhchang

The first SCI, rock geochemical, review cycle is fast, submitted on January 8th, the review result given on February 18th, major revision, requires one monthAfter the revision, return

(0) Thank | 浪尖飞石

withEditor 20 days, it really is very slow...

(2) Thank | ii423

Do you know about the journal friends?My with editor is almost 10 days, has not changed

(0) Thank | xia

The review cycle is not as fast as the upstairs said.

(1) Thank | xia

Still have to consider resubmission.I submitted the manuscript on December 16th. On the 20th, I returned the manuscript and said that the line number was not correct. I changed the manuscript on the same day. It has been submitted to journal status for 5 days.

(0) Thank | xia

sad

(0) Thank | xia

The review speed is very fast, probably because I submitted a manuscript just missing a special issue, and the editor-in-chief suggested to switch to a special issue of the ocean.The two reviewers are Nice, a major overhaul, and a minor repair.Two months out of the results.After the revision, it was quickly acceptd.

(0) Thank | 1028890156@qq.com

First trial, three months, overhaul, revised one month, second trial for four months, no news, very speechless, I know soSlow, definitely not select for this journal!!!!!!!1

(7) Thank | 8889

has been submitted, the editor is not dragging, the time is faster, if the reviewer has a better opinion, the speed is ultra-fast, and the influence factor is gradually rising

(0) Thank | 723348335@qq.com

Can't hang, it is estimated that the manuscript is more than

(2) Thank | 阿发

The review speed is faster, and the impact factor is increased.Can you break 3 next year?

(0) Thank | 鱼肉马虎

review speed is fast, easy to publish

(0) Thank | qsf

is too pitted!The person downstairs said that the review manuscript was fast, and then I was submitted with a feverish mind. As a result, I haven’t received the manuscript for 8 days now!!I also encountered the slow receipt for the first time!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Reviewing speed is fast and easy to send.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

The first trial was three and a half months, overhauled, and the second trial was accepted for half a month.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

Boyfriend's manuscript, 8.16 overhaul manuscript decision in progress, 8.22 overhaul manuscript directly accept.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

2012 Impact Factor: 2.152 5-Year Impact Factor: 2.301 Issues per year: 18

(1) Thank | Anonymous