My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 162453 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ APPL PHYS
ISSN0021-8979
E-ISSN1089-7550
h-index294
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
4.200.7280.984
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: General Physics and Astronomy
Q152 / 224

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)8.40%
Official Websitehttp://jap.aip.org
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://jap.peerx-press.org/cgi-bin/main.plex
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER INST PHYSICS, CIRCULATION & FULFILLMENT DIV, 2 HUNTINGTON QUADRANGLE, STE 1 N O 1, MELVILLE, USA, NY, 11747-4501
Subject AreaPhysics
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1937
Annual Article Volume2028
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0021-8979%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 3.2 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 38%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-18 23:14:00
In relation to the field of explosive mechanics, JAP is still a fairly high-level journal. 260 day cycle. 4 reviewers. They gave a review opinion of about 5 pages, which greatly improved the paper.

(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 慢慢


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-08 23:57:06
Made of elastic wave metamaterials, submitted on 2018-07-23, received on October 8, for a total of 77 days.The editor was more serious and changed three times before receiving it.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 慢慢

Author: 流沙


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-08 13:43:36
The requirements of the journal are very strict, mainly to review the reviewers.However, the efficiency of the journal processing manuscript is very high. The result of the first two-week select is the result. After the revision, it is accepted. It is a very good journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 流沙

Author: 1073938894@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-21 09:04:52
submitted on June 5, 2018, received first-instance opinion on July 13, two reviewers, the main time spent on reviewers, the first reviewer finished 8 days, the secondThe reviewer completed the review in 10 days, and the overall comments were more. The editor gave the overhaul, submitted the revised manuscript on August 5, acceptd on August 13, and the August 15th notice was selected as the editor's pick, the efficiency lever.Drop, follow-up consideration to re-submit in the journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | 1073938894@qq.com

Author: 469599697@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-28 10:32:25
The first one of the select in June 2017, overhauled one month later, and then minorly repaired once., receiving, speed is OK.However, the second submission has not been so smooth recently. The reviewers who were looking for the previous review did not submit the review comments, and then the editors found the reviewers, and they are still in the review.I hope there will be good results.A good physics journal, if this time, the next time you want to rush a higher journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 469599697@qq.com

Author: 588


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-22 18:29:37
Days Since Original Submission: 123
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 588

Author: 584


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-22 14:28:57
From submission to the present, 62 days, and still looking for reviewers, the reason is that only one of the two reviewers found before completed the review, and another one month has arrived.The trial was later re-discovered by the editor until now.The reviewer is uneasy to complete the review, which is also a kind of untrustworthy behavior, harming people!
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 584

Author: edchen


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-12-28 16:54:43
Published on August 22, 2015, returned the revised opinion on September 10, the speed is fast enough, two reviewers, one said the picture format changed to minor repair, the other should be the same fieldI have raised a few very pertinent questions and asked for references.It took two weeks to reply, and received it directly on October 11 and online on October 22.Issue Date: 28-OCT-15The editing speed is extremely fast, and it is somewhat doubtful that the second reviewer is the editor.
 The page fee is voluntary and may not be paid.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | edchen

Author: h1061717965


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-09-16 20:33:50
This journal is becoming more and more strict. The papers must be innovative, and the publications can be faster. In physics, the journals with higher quality are expected to have higher impact factors!
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | h1061717965

Author: 无


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-08-08 23:36:54
I feel very fortunate, the first article published, I did not expect to directly accept after the minor repair, only one month before and after, it is worth a select!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 无

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-17 20:32:00
ask: 18 days selectdJAP.The current status is All Reviewers Secured.Does this mean that it has been submitted to reviewers for review?
Show Review in Original Language
(21) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-27 02:49:00
After the first trial, the overhaul, the reviewer gave a lot of good comments and suggestions.After two weeks, it was revised and uploaded to the website according to the reviewer's comments. After a week, it was accepted directly for a total of 76 days.The editors and reviewers encountered this time are very fast, saving a lot of time
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-06 21:34:00
hanging a US university or research institute, directly receiving
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-06 14:45:00
The reviewer, overhauled in the first instance, but the evaluation was very high. After the revision, the
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-22 09:51:00
was directly rejected by other journals. After two months of careful revision, the journal was selectd.Although the waiting time was a bit long, the result was lucky to receive it.Manuscript Sent to Production20-Jul-2013 19:05:15Manuscript Ready for Production18-Jul-2013 12:37:37Decision Sent to Author18-Jul-2013 12:37:37Decision Letter Being Prepared17-Jul-20
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-17 20:41:00
Stage Start Date Manuscript Ready for Production 15-Jul-2013 08:59:48 Decision Sent to Author 15-Jul-2013 08:59:48 Decision Letter Being Prepared 12-Jul-2013 21:50:55 AssociateEditor Decision Completed 12-Jul-2013 21:50:55
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-16 23:44:00
APL was rejected, reviewers and editors were recommended to submit in JAP, so they were overhauled according to the reviewer's comments, thenI selectd for JAP and didn't expect to receive it directly after 5 days!I hope to send an APL in the future.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-03 19:24:00
I waited for 2 months in the first trial, and the reviewer gave a major overhaul, but the questions actually raised were not many and easier to answer. After 2 weeks of revision, I returned and continued to wait for 2 weeks.accept!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-30 13:24:00
Very good journal, but sometimes...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-29 08:01:00
StageStart DateManuscript Ready for Production28-May-2013 12:28:01Decision Sent to Author28-May-2013 12:28:01Decision Letter Being Prepared28-May-2013 11:52:41Associate Editor Decision Completed28-May-2013 11:52:41Associate
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-17 13:50:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-01 11:49:00
Delivery for 23 days, the status is still all reviewers secured. I don't know how long it will take to under review.!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-14 22:03:00
A reviewer, the speed is very fast, as long as the first time the reviewer is found, the result will be within 15 days, and the revised draft will be returned to the reviewer, but I don’t know if it is stillFor the same person, the corresponding review time for the revised manuscript is faster, and I changed it twice.For the first time in the reviewer for ten days, the second revision for four days gave an opinion.A total of two months down, now waiting for the schedule
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-06 16:59:00
2013.1.6 Submitted a month after the overhaul of a reviewer said that I organized, language and presentation problems, the other yes to the yes, overhaul gave a month to return to find a reviewThe person refused to review the manuscript. The boss said that the reviewer was dissatisfied and found the reviewer and refused to review the draft. The third reviewer refused to submit the paper after one week, but they also added some dissatisfaction with the content of the article.I am very pertinent. I wrote a discussion on a certain issue. He said that I did not write a plan to change to Chinese physics or Chinese science. Many people said that if they are rejected, they can directly change to select for me.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-03 19:13:00
The first time I selectd for JAP, I went to see the article status today and found that it has been processed.Because yesterday's state was in the editor's hands to prepare the decision, thinking that it was directly rejected, the result was not directly accepted without modification.It should be said that it is too lucky.It is less than one month from submission to acceptance.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service