Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | J APPL PHYCOL | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0921-8971 | ||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1573-5176 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 93 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 21.60% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://www.springer.com/journal/10811 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/JAPH | ||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS, 3311 GZ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Biology | ||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | NETHERLANDS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Bimonthly | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1989 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 353 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0921-8971%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: Average 2 Month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 50% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY: | Write a review |
Author: 阿宝 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-02-20 19:22:20 Submitted on December 9th, first revision submitted on February 11th, and after the second revision submitted on February 19th, it was accepted on the same evening. The editor-in-chief and editors were very friendly. It was about Microalgae Nutrition and Lipid Metabolism. This is my first article in Journal of Applied Phycology, and the second article is being reviewed. I hope there will be good news! ![]() ![]() |
Author: snooker Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-10-07 00:36:33 March 22, submitted; March 27, resubmitted (format question); April 6, Under review; April 15, Under review; August 12, Reviews Completed. (During July 28, I wrote to ask why the under review took so long. The editor-in-chief was nice and replied that he also felt that one of the reviewers was too slow. He helped me urging it and let me wait patiently.) August 13, major revision (6 weeks given for major revisions). September 26, revision submitted; September 26 Editor Assigned; September 27, Accepted. To sum up, the journal is average, but the editor is fast, but the reviewers are a bit slow. One of them delayed us for at least more than three months without reviewing the manuscript. After being urged by the editor, the manuscript was successfully reviewed. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 769306713@qq.com Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-10-09 09:12:16 Several months for review. Overall, the speed of review is very fast, the editor and the two reviewers were very nice, and the opinions given were also very objective. Highly efficient. ![]() ![]() |
Author: thfn Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-03-23 09:59:30 is almost three months old, still in the hands of the editor, what is the situation? ![]() ![]() |
Author: thfn Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-03-23 09:59:27 almost three months, stillWhat is the situation in the editor? ![]() ![]() |
Author: xusss01 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-09-03 13:45:39 Reviewing is very fast, it took a month, but regret tragedy.Two reviewers, one comment is very detailed, the other one does not understand how to understand the article, just a random comment. ![]() ![]() |
Author: hyjzy Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-09-18 20:16:01 5 Month, overhaul in July, rehabilitated on September 8th, accepted on September 15. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-07-03 18:47:15 Reviewing is still very fast, the first overhaul, made a lot of comments, after a reply, the first is Reviewer Invited, but received directly after one week.Maybe it’s luck.But this journal is very application-oriented. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 喵 Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-05-21 09:38:52 The first trial is not fast, submitted in January, minor notice in May, but soon after the revisionI received it, and I feel quite lucky.The main activity is the biological activity of a component in algae, from isolation and purification to animal experiments. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-10-11 22:16:00 is very fast, 2 weeks to review the comments, and then raised some small questions, let the English strengthen, gave 4 weeks of minor repair time!Based on the advice received, I have decided that your manuscript can be accepted for publication after you have carried out the corrections as suggested by the reviewer(s). ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-12-06 17:42:00 The review speed of the journal is still relatively fast. After the first trial, it may be that the two reviewers have different opinions. Once again, the review is rejected, but the editor only gave a review.People's opinions, avoiding the main contribution of the article, and mentioning some unrelated issues. In general, their articles have certain flaws. I hope that next time good luck ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-12-06 17:07:00 thisThe speed of the journal is quite strong, but the editors who helped me find the reviewer too, and raised a lot of completely irrelevant questions. Some of them are really common sense. He still asks, it is speechless.And the English level is really invincible than I am, but the speed may be my luck. Now I have already selectd for a higher number of journals. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-11-13 12:25:00 In addition to commercial applications, related to algaeBasic research will also be received.The reviewer is very objective and the editing efficiency is also very high. I gave advice for two months, and the overhaul was returned one month later.The overall feel is good, the format requirements are still relatively strict. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-03-30 07:01:00 is mainly focused on research with commercial value algae, with higher language requirements, and the first-instance cycle is about 6 weeks. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |