X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE]Hello, you are Visitor Number 76551 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Journal Title AbbreviationsINT J ENG SCI
ISSN0020-7225
h-index94
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
15.203.7641.865
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Materials Science
Q121 / 460
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Mechanical Engineering
Q110 / 585
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: General Engineering
Q13 / 299
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Mechanics of Materials
Q19 / 367

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)21.60%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/278/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/JENS
Open AccessNo
PublisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1963
Annual Article Volume106
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0020-7225%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 4.5 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 3.3 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Data from Elsevier: 9%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 4.7 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)
  Reviews on INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE: Write a review
Author: 邹博


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-04-23 13:02:30
Completely agree with the view on the 75th floor! Just look at J N Reddy, Fellow of the National Academy of Engineering, who had published 18 articles in this journal in 45 years from 1974 to the present, and you must know how awesome this journal is. This is the publication record of J N Reddy: 2018 (2), 2016 (2), 2015 (1), 2014 (1), 2013 (1), 2011 (1), 2010 (1), 2007 (1), 2004 (1), 1994 (1), 1989 (2), 1985 (1), 1978 (1), 1976 (1), 1974 (1)

(7) Thank | 邹博

Author: Cai B.


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-04-09 22:18:55
After “with editor” for 82 days, I received comments from 4 reviewers. The reviewers are very responsible and the questions are very detailed. The first reviewer asked 13 questions. Many of the questions hit the nail on the head of the manuscript without mentioning rejection and acceptance. The second one asked 9 questions. The questions are very professional and detailed, but the overall opinions are relatively optimistic. The third one recommended a rejection, saying that the manuscript was not innovative enough and there was no essential innovation! The fourth one said that the manuscript is flawed, but it can be modified! But unfortunately, it was still rejected. The quality of the journal is very good, but the volume of publications is very low (105 articles). Sometimes it really depends on the luck. This was not the case in previous years!

(4) Thank | Cai B.

Author: 幽灵


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-03-09 19:28:29
Journal is of good quality and focus on innovation. I majored in multi-scale material optimization design; the editor-in-chief was very interested. The writing was not good at the beginning, the editor-in-chief asked me to revise it carefully. I supplemented my stimulation for nearly a month. It was accepted in the second review. Received 20 October 2018, Revised 23 December 2018, Accepted 20 January 2019, Available online 6 March 2019. The editor-in-chief was outsourced in India, and the review was very slow. Only status of with editor was available, no under editor. I browsed many comments on this journal, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering (CMAME) and Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids (JMPS), or International Journal of Pharmaceutics (IJP), International Journal of Solids and Structures (IJSS). I don’t think there is good or bad. Those can be published on JMPS, are not surely suitable for IJES or CMAME, everyone focuses on different points. There is no need to say which one is better, which one is inferior. These journals are all good, as long as the content is innovative. But the acceptance rate of this journal is very low. It is very good that all are double-blinded. As I know, many other journals of mechanics are mutually reviewed. It is easy for insiders’ articles to be accepted, but it is not for sure of this journal.

(54) Thank | 幽灵

Author: byzlai


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-25 21:04:21
The deputy editor directly rejected the manuscript. I saw that they were doing nano, basically no experiment.I was full of confidence, I didn’t expect to edit this level.I regret to inform you that after careful consideration of your manuscript and the views of the handling editors have advised against which publication. I must therefore reject it. I know you will be disappointed by this outcome but I should nevertheless like to thank you for consideringInternational journal of engineering science as a location for your work.Associate Editor:Due to the lack of experimental verification, it must be rejected.

(0) Thank | byzlai

Author: Xuting


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-24 10:50:45
Powerful journal!The real-time impact factor broke through 8.6, and the breakthrough 10 is just around the corner.Unfortunately, the team has selectd three times, all three shots and three rejections.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Xuting

Author: 独自去偷欢


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-22 15:28:05
On January 10, 2019,With editor 12 days,Directly rejected,Ref: IJES_2019_101Title: On...........Journal: International Journal of Engineering ScienceDear Dr...,I have looked through your paper, and I have to decline it. This particular problem is of too narrow an interest for a general engineering journal such as IJES. I suggest you submit it to a more specialized publication,
 Respectfully,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 独自去偷欢

Author: SQ


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-22 09:22:10
It was quite smooth.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | SQ

Author: shu


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-06 13:57:59
Take a look at the American Academy of Engineering academician j.n. reddy from 1974 to the present,After publishing 18 articles in this journal for 45 years, I know how popular this journal is.This is the publication record of j.n. reddy:2018 (2)2016 (2)2015 (1)2014 (1)2013 (1)2011 (1)2010 (1)2007 (1)2004 (1)1994 (1)1989 (2)1985 (1)1978 (1)1976 (1)1974 (1)
Show Review in Original Language
(23) Thank | shu

Author: shu


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-06 13:55:37
Many big cows in the world are submitted on it, but because of the novelty of the content, it is easy to be commented. Since 1974, a total of 753 comments have been published.2018 (8)2017 (10)2016 (12)2015 (16)2014 (15)2013 (9)2012 (25)2011 (12)2010 (17)2009 (13)2008 (4)2007 (4)2006 (10)2005 (5)2004 (9)2003 (12)2002 (4)2001 (7)2000 (9)1999 (7)1998 (14)1997 (9)1996 (15)1995 (16)1994 (17)In the past 45 years, a total of 6,567 articles have been published, and 753 articles have been commented.In other words, the probability of the paper being commented is 11.4%.It is enough to explain the advancement and newness of this journal!!!
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | shu

Author: shu


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-06 13:55:01
Look at the American Academy of Engineering academician JN Reddy. Since 1974, he has published 18 articles in this journal for 45 years, and he knows how popular this journal is.This is the release record of J.N. Reddy:2018 (2)2016 (2)2015 (1)2014 (1)2013 (1)2011 (1)2010 (1)2007 (1)2004 (1)1994 (1)1989 (2)1985 (1)1978 (1)1976 (1)1974 (1)
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | shu

Author: jrw


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-28 13:46:52
I am from Top 10 colleges and universities, doing micro-nano machinery manufacturing.,Editor-in-chief, I want to limit the amount of micro-nano machinery published.With editor 32 days, rejected, generic template,Dear prof.. ....,i have looked through your paper, and i have to decline it. this particular problem is of too narrow an interest for the general audience of the journal (plus, i have to limit the proportion of papers on nano- topics).Submit it to a more professional publication where it would have larger readership,Respectfully,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | jrw

Author: luhang


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-04 00:14:07
Reviewers are more demanding, at least after review by more than three reviewers, the editor is very rigorous and too slow!It is recommended that people who do not lack articles can select!
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | luhang

Author: luhang


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-04 00:10:12
Do collision optimization design, first trial for five months, come back four comments: all recognize the article's innovation,However, one reviewer believes that the theoretical derivation, simulation and experimentation are flawed.Responded to more than 20 pages of reviewers, but the reviewer is holding on to this point, and the final article was rejected.Later, this article selectd for a journal with an impact factor of IF=5 points.I feel that this journal is now a macroscopic mechanical field. The traditional machinery is not easy to make. It is easy to do micro-nano machinery. This is also the reason why this journal is now rising. The recruitment rate is less than 4%. It is a good journal. The reviewer asks a bit.Too harsh.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | luhang

Author: Chaos mechanics


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-17 19:29:33
Do chaotic mechanics, three reviewers, two of whom recognize the innovation of the article.However, another reviewer thought that the innovation was not enough, and asked for additional experiments. After two months of revision, he euphemistically refused the opinions of the third reviewer. After uploading, the editor directly rejected the draft.The editor said that our journal is now more and more popular, and we currently only accept less than 3% of the recruitment rate.Papers that may have been accepted a few years ago are now facing more intense space competition in the journal, so we have to reject your paper.The overall feeling is that the reviewers are very sharp and difficult, and they are top experts.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Chaos mechanics

Author: piaoyi


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-04 17:26:32
Agree to the downstairs, ijes will definitely be a cow journal in the future, and the impact factor has not broken through 10 and hurry to submit!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | piaoyi

Author: liqs


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-24 11:03:56
Has anyone recently selectd for this journal?With editor 40 days, how still still not moving?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | liqs

Author: 北大湍流


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-20 20:46:40
Agree to the downstairs, ijes will definitely be a cow journal in the future, and the impact factor has not broken through 10 and hurry to submit.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 北大湍流

Author: 上海交大


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-09 11:12:25
Rest assured, ijes will definitely be a cow in the future.Journal, 趁Impact factor has not broken through 10 hurry to submit ah
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 上海交大

Author: 生物狗


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-08 09:43:15
Since I think it is well written, the idea is very new and the result is very important.With editor 97 days rejection, universal templatei have looked through your paper, and i have to decline it. this particular problem is of too narrow an interest for the general audience of the journal. i suggest you submit it to a more professional publication where it would have larger readership.If this is the reason, the editor can reject the draft early, why bother everyone's time?
Show Review in Original Language
(13) Thank | 生物狗

Author: 焦点


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-06 16:56:40
It is estimated that more than 3,100 submissions will be made in the year, and only 105 articles will be published.The journal has only two states, with editor and reject. If you do something new, the speed of reception will be very fast.I saw that there was a personal submission for a year after receiving
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 焦点

Author: 焦点


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-06 16:39:07
with editor In fact, it is also submitted for review, this journal does not underReview This state, previously recorded an article, has been with the editor this state, waited for more than three months, three reviewers expert opinion
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 焦点

Author: 焦点


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-06 16:38:55
with editor In fact, it is also submitted for review, this journal is not under reviewThis state, previously recorded an article, has been with the editor this state, waited for more than three months, three reviewers expert opinion
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 焦点

Author: 剑荡四方


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-06 15:01:06
with editor 60 days, there is no news at all, too pit.After reading the papers published in the journal, it was received within two months. It is estimated that the editors will selectively submit the articles of the related households for review, and the remaining manuscripts will be processed once a month.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 剑荡四方

Author: 双一流高校


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-28 11:34:28
Just started to make changes, because there is no supplementary experiment, the editor-in-chief is not sent for review, directly refused, I feel that the reviewer is very sharp, the editor is very strict
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 双一流高校

Author: 数学物理爱好者


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-25 21:26:15
The above articles in IJES are more ideological and novel.At the same time, because its content is the most avant-garde, some articles of view, theory, and pictures are easy to be commented.The probability that the above article is almost a comment is one tenth, and you are cautiously contributing.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 数学物理爱好者

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)

Start your review of [INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service