X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 80047 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleINDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Journal Title AbbreviationsIND CROP PROD
ISSN0926-6690
h-index103
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
6.900.9611.678
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Agronomy and Crop Science
Q120 / 334

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)15.60%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/522825/description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/INDCRO
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaAgriculture and Forestry
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencyBimonthly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume987
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0926-6690%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.3 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 66%
Data from Elsevier: 16%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 4.7 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS: Write a review
Author: zhaohuajun1210@126.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-01 09:44:44
A little long, but the editor and reviewers were very sincere, patient and fair.

(10) Thank | zhaohuajun1210@126.com

Author: HHHH


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-28 14:08:24
Oct 02, 2018 Submitted to JournalOct 03, 2018 with editorOct 12, 2018 with editorOct 13, 2018 under reviewNov 30, 2018 Major revision and reconsiderationDec 13, 2018 submit the revisionDec 15, 2018 with editorDec 17, 2018 under reviewDec 27, 2018 AccepteLook at the speed of review, look good luck, I wish you good luck
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | HHHH

Author: 2420151318@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-07 17:29:02
Submitted on December 12, 17th, with the editor for almost half a month, the first trial cycle is too long, the middle has changed once, and later the draft, the early April repair, repaired after the minor repair twoTimes, June receiving
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 2420151318@qq.com

Author: sqy


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-13 09:36:10
From submission to returnOpinion 5 months, two or three days after the change, I received the acceptance notice
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | sqy

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-19 10:10:28
Rejection is not fast, refused to submit, submitted on April 2nd, with editor on the 9th, under review on June 16th, rejected on July 16.Oh, it wasted more than three months.Students who are not in a hurry can try it. It is better to take a detour in time.The first time I selectd for this journal, I was very impressed.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: fan


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-22 12:22:23
Slow and slow to dieEach modification must be returned for two months, a total of two modifications, plus before and after the piecemeal time, more than ten monthsReviewers are two at a time, one seriously and one not seriousBut it is also a district.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | fan

Author: Vivian


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-17 23:41:01
1.31 submit3.20 major revision4.9 submit R15.9 minor revision5.14 submit R25.17 accepted
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Vivian

Author: 626068904@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-03 11:07:11
Review speedAlso, one month for review, three months later,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 626068904@qq.com

Author: yhk159357@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-02 16:34:11
This journal is very slow and is very, very, very kindSubmitted for five months, still reviewing the manuscript, no newsBut disgusting, let me give them a review of the journal for only 15 days.Nothing is more disgusting than this.There are no more disgusting journals than this.If you are eager to graduate, don't select for this journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | yhk159357@163.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-03-04 12:10:12
Reviewing speed is simply slow into a dog, more than 2 months or with editor, seriously affecting the novelty of the publication of the paper, will not select this journal again
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 1020509833@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-26 14:41:50
2016.06.18 submit2016.06.23 witheditor2016.08.012016.08.20 is given to another editor, it is estimated that the first editor is busy and has not been processed.2016.09.01 reminder (because the article is urgent) still with editor2016.09.06 Retraction (I really don't want to wait) Editor-in-Chief directly under review2016.09.13 There is only one reviewer's opinion on the opinion revision.2016.09.19submit the revision2016.09.20 with editor2016.09.23 Reminder (it is too urgent)2016.09.24 acceptIn short, it is still smooth, luck is very good, the appropriate reason for the draft is still quite useful
Show Review in Original Language
(23) Thank | 1020509833@qq.com

Author: catty5082003@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-01 13:06:45
to do fermentation, more partial application, accept after overhaul.I feel that the speed is OK, I don’t want everyone to say so slowly.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | catty5082003@163.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-02-07 16:37:36
is relatively fast, do anti-oxidation antibacterial test of crude extracts of medicine and food plants, no analysis components, and soon notify that it is not in the receiving range,
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: allan


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-28 16:30:52
direction-vegetable oil modified synthetic degradable lubricating base oil, focusing on tribological testing and lubrication mechanism discussion, submitted in May, With editor statusFor one and a half months, the Under review status was maintained for two and a half months. There was only one reviewer's opinion. The editor's opinion was more pertinent, requiring a minor change, and it took a week to modify the second day after the revised draft was accepted.The whole process is still smooth, the first Sci is not easy, and there are still requirements for innovation.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | allan

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-07 06:32:00
The quality of this journal is very good, editor and reviewerAlso very professional.Processing speed is also ok.Personal comparison recommended.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-01 00:22:00
Submission: Apr 17, 2013 Acceptance: Jul 31, 2013 modified in the middle, returned after acceptance.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-26 19:51:00
has been submitted for one month, and is still reviewing the manuscript. I have submitted
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-16 11:01:00
7 on the 6th, and I have experienced two major overhauls in the middle.It is accepted on November 21.The time is a bit long, but I am still very pleased to receive it.Three manuscripts were urging in the middle, mainly because the reviewers did not give force.The editor-in-chief is more objective and fair!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-20 19:05:00
2013 IF = 2.468 basically keep unchanged
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-03 17:09:00
2 on February 28th submitted on March 4th wiht editor March 6th under review March 21st required review completed March24th minor revision March 29th deadline revised manuscript March 30 with editor April 13th reminder April 15 accept speed quickly do biomass energy students can consider
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-22 16:55:00
contribution more than ten daysThe editor is Elisabete Frollini, which seems to be slow.Nor does it review or reject.Have you ever encountered this editor?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-18 21:20:00
Under The review status changed on October 21, and the status date changed again on November 4th and 18th.Can't find the reviewer? Tangle!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-08 16:43:00
The speed is very fast, less than one month gave a revised opinion, minor repair.The editor requested that the revised draft be submitted within 15 days, because there are other things, so the revised draft will not be submitted until the last day.One day later, the editor wrote a letter and the article was accepted.The whole thing is actually completed in one month.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-05 21:39:00
is the extraction and functional evaluation of the active ingredients. After two months of reviewing, it is overhauled and directly accepted after overhaul.The journal is quite good.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-26 22:27:00
feels very slow, selectd on September 2nd, the author is only entedited after one week, and only one week after technical check, 2 days later, with editor, the result with editor for a month, thenFrom October 18th, UNDER REVIEW, the result is today December 13th, still in UNDER REVIEW, the article that was submitted at the beginning of the school, one semester is coming to an end, the shadow is not
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service