Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | IEEE T IND ELECTRON | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0278-0046 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 236 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 9.80% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://tie.ieee-ies.org/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tie-ieee | ||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC, 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855-4141 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Engineering | ||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Bimonthly | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 952 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0278-0046%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 9.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: Very difficult | ||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS: | Write a review |
Author: 快迷失的科研人 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 9.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-03-06 05:35:35 I don’t know if my character was too bad or IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics had reformed. I consult experts: 1. The first review lasted 2 months, and finally there were 7 reviewers. According to the comments, I analysis that one reviewer rejected it, six reviewers gave comments on major revision, and the editor gave comments on major revision. 2. I carefully answer the questions and resubmitted it, after that, the results of the second review changed into minor revision, only one review asked two simple questions, and the rest passed. 3. After submitting again, the style of painting suddenly changed, three comments changed into major revision, and three reviewers were added, which was 10 reviewers in total. The newly added comments seemed to be two major revisions and one rejection required. Is there any hope for this article in this case? I wasted nearly a year of serious revisions, but I did not expect in exchange for such outcome. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-10-28 15:25:00 Long process and numerous reviewers. At present, in order to increase the citation rate, TIE likes to collect large and comprehensive papers. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 论文大虾 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 11.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-02-19 10:41:58 Journal review is too slow!2018 0221 submission2018 0908 First trial results, three overhauls, 2 rejections, rejection of results2018 1021 Modify re-attendance2019 0101 second trial results 3 rejections, 3 overhauls, rejection of results2019 0129 Modify re-attendance2019 0219 Editor's reply, please switch to other journalsCompletely speechless! ![]() ![]() |
Author: ahjwd Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-10-08 21:37:05 It's not that hard, we have five in a year. ![]() ![]() |
Author: darksword@aliyun.com Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-06-28 22:08:09 Special professional, reading very carefully, the problem is very comprehensive, without any weaknesses, it is indeed a very good top journal. ![]() ![]() |
Author: lixp Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-06-25 18:44:20 Awaiting EIC Decision is more than two weeks. What is the situation? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-06-14 19:54:49 Seriously agree with the 48th floor, the most difficult thing about submiting in this journal is that you have to let the reviewers understand what you are doing on 8 pages.If a paper is relatively new, it is easy to be rejected.Because the most comments in the review comments are: .... I don't understand here, ..... You didn't make it clear here, ..... I am confused, and so on. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 神风特 Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-01-25 16:54:08 difficult to understand the reviewer, the impact factor is high, the difficulty is not as good as other low if journals. ![]() ![]() |
Author: xkj2006xkj@126.com Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-10-11 08:38:32 September 21 submission, the status begins with Assigned to AE, Under Review, after 10 days, it becomes Assigned to AE, then becomes Under Review, and now becomes Assigned to AE, noKnow what is the situation?Do you know?Thank you! ![]() ![]() |
Author: xkj2006xkj@126.com Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-10-11 08:37:56 September 21 submission, the status begins with Assigned to AE, Under Review, after 10 days, it becomes Assigned to AE, then becomes Under Review, and now becomes Assigned to AE, noKnow what is the situation?Do you know?Thank you! ![]() ![]() |
Author: hujin_boy@163.com Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-08-25 19:32:41 1 early submission, intermediate overhaul twoIt was announced at the beginning of August.Feeling review is quick, professional advice is serious, a good submission experience ![]() ![]() |
Author: lwqangle Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-08-16 22:45:57 The first submission, after three months, the overhaul was notified, the deadline was 6 weeks, the point to point was changed after one month, and it was accepted after 2 months, which took six months. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-05-05 09:33:53 Although it was rejected, but benefited a lot, I have to admit that it isThe control of the big cow can make a long article in this publication, the annual contribution is too amazing ![]() ![]() |
Author: panjian Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-04-19 14:31:46 Absolute ace journals rank first in automation control and electronics.After submitting for 4 months, the comments came back, 5 reviewers, nearly 100 comments, and the results were rejected.I hope I can have an article in the future and give myself a long face. ![]() ![]() |
Author: gtl75008810@126.com Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-04-08 12:42:46 16 in June, and returned to the overhaul in September, and 5 reviewers; in December, the second trial was rejected, and 4 reviewers, 3 of which were the firstThe reviewer of the round, two no comments, one wrote a lot of revision opinions, the new one reviewer did not catch the result, and finally the editor-in-chief refused...However, the instructor insisted on re-submitment, so he re-entered tie in March of 17 years, I hope this time has a good result!This journal is undoubtedly the top publication recognized by the school. The recognition degree is still relatively high. Generally, the review comments are reviewed in 3 months, and the expert's reply is also very specific. ![]() ![]() |
Author: futurefly@sina.com Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-01-03 21:27:15 Journal editing is very efficient, reviewers are very professional and high.I am happy that I have accepted this article. It is a representative.Haha ![]() ![]() |
Author: 304456513@qq.com Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-07-30 10:01:08 Please everyone clear the situation, now is IEEE Transactions on power electronics requires self-referencing, not industrial electronics! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2014-05-01 03:27:10 was recorded two articles.The first time I refused to re-submit the manuscript, and then re-submited in three or four months, the first major overhaul, the second minor repair, and the third recruitment took more than a year.The second post was overhauled two months later, and then acceptd one month later, taking more than three months. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-09-25 15:06:00 4 Reviewers, one accepted, two minor repairs, one rejected, and finally rejected.The letter of rejection sent to me on the New Year's Eve, but fortunately, I didn't have access to the Internet.The impact factor is very high, the submission system has a guide and self-citing, and the overall is a very good journal. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-09-06 08:02:00 has been in trial for three months and is still in Under View.The TIE review is too slow, and it is the slowest of the IEEE T I have submitted.Three months of TPEL have been received.If you submit a paper at the same time, priority is given to TPEL.If you submitted two papers in the same period of time, consider a TPEL, a TIE. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-09-05 20:11:00 For this dear friend downstairs, I just want to say a word!! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-07-10 16:53:00 TIE is definitely the top journal, and more accurately it is definitely the top journal of electrical engineering.After reading everyone's comments, I feel that the xapple008's dear friend should have been rejected and miserable, so it seems to be complaining.In fact, it is not necessary. Anyway, it is all American imperialism. How can it compare with our great motherland?Right? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-04-07 19:44:00 As far as the motor profession is concerned, it is really a journal with a high impact factor!Counting cows! ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-02-26 20:04:00 TIE is a top publication, OK ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-02-26 20:03:00 ...Ok - - Just talk about it, don't be really wrong. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last (To Page |