X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 90011 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleIEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS
Journal Title AbbreviationsIEEE SIGNAL PROC LET
ISSN1070-9908
E-ISSN1558-2361
h-index118
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.401.1452.085
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Q178 / 670
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Applied Mathematics
Q113 / 510
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Signal Processing
Q116 / 103

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)7.70%
Official Websitehttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=97
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/sps-ieee
Open AccessNo
PublisherIEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC, 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855-4141
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume371
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1070-9908%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.7 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 80%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-03 22:09:00
Must be novel, practical, and impactful. About 2 months to first review.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Yatsi


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-14 16:57:53
Reviewing is very efficient!In mid-November, the reviewer returned the results in late December, and AE gave a minor review after New Year's Day; after one week of revision, the next day.The reviewer's opinion is relatively professional, but there is still a certain gap compared to Trans in the second district.The advantage is that the review speed is very fast, and the paper can be displayed at the C class meeting of the corresponding signal processing or image processing after the paper is accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Yatsi

Author: wangchen


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-14 22:40:24
Reviewing speed is very fast,After the submission, the editor will be assigned quickly, and the result will be about one month~ The requirements for English and innovation are higher~ Two reviewers give more detailed comments~ It is a high-quality journal with good signal processing. If the article is written better,You can try ~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | wangchen

Author: Martin


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-20 15:16:16
I selectd twice for this journal. The first time was 2.22 in 2017, 5.31 was rejected, two reviewers, one minor repair, one rejection, 7.20 re-entry, and 9.15 again.Refused, three reviewers, two minor repairs, one refused.The second time was 9.11 in 2018, and the result of 10.27 first trial was AQ, that is, the necessary revisions were made, four reviewers, one directly received, two minor repairs, one rejected, 11.10 revised and re-submited, and 11.20 were acceptd..
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Martin

Author: connectyyh@126.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-16 16:04:33
The first time SPL, October 2017The result of the first trial in December, according to permission to re-submitIt was repaired and returned in January 2018 and will be accepted on May 16.A good letter in the communications field, some feelings are harder than IEEE Communications Letters, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters and Electronics LettersI wish you all good luck
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | connectyyh@126.com

Author: CVer


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-29 16:42:32
selectd in September last year and was rejected, thinking that innovation is not enough.After all, I basically rewritten it, and the method has been greatly modified. It can be said that it is basically two articles and the previous article.Rejected the manuscript, but the editor encouraged re-submitment and finally received it after the overhaul.The quality of the journal is good
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | CVer

Author: Michael


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-19 15:59:57
English is very demanding and directly rejected...The English level is not enough, and the quality of the article is not good.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Michael

Author: 行者


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-05-21 10:22:33
is a classic authoritative journal with high recognition in the field of signal processing.
Show Review in Original Language
(69) Thank | 行者

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-26 12:38:00
Let me add that my doctoral student has tossed for half a year and finally made a positive result!There is a paper that will be accepted for publication by IEEEE Signal Processing Letters!The joy of joy is beyond words!The journal is a very authoritative journal in the field of signal processing in the IEEE, and is also a very challenging IEEE journal, JCR Zone 2!The IF is as high as 1.7. The papers included in this journal require strong innovation, language organization and solid English writing skills. From the feedback of reviewers, the level and vision of reviewers are very high.Cut the key, no mercy!Judging from the submissions over the years, it is generally difficult to reflect the journal!I am going to update a little bit of information with IEEE Transaction
Show Review in Original Language
(65) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-15 12:14:00
. In the last half year, I selectd for two, one accepts one rejection, and each has three reviewers.The article I accepted, I am very confident, because there are indeed a lot of innovations, and not only theoretically deduced, but also the experimental results are well reflected.Originally prepared to select for IEEE TSP but anxious to ask for an article, the core content is here.
Show Review in Original Language
(20) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-28 23:56:00
finally recorded it for me. After the revision, the re-submitment was included. I feel that this journal is still relatively good. As long as the comments of the review are answered one by one, of course, you should reply carefully.The probability of being rejected is not too big.The only downside is that this journal is only a C-category journal in the CCF classification, but the impact factor is very high, reaching 1.674. It ranks in the engineering area of ​​the 3rd district of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and the lowest impact factor of the 3 district is about 1.2.Let's go.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-21 10:48:00
received a minor and a rej, the deputy editor found another one to review, is a rej, and then gave rej, but allowed to re-submitted after modification, has been re-submited, the result is unknown,good luck.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-12 17:00:00
The first SCI, a small algorithm for visual target tracking; 2013.5.23 contribution, 2013.7.15 first trial result with minor revision, three reviewers, 2013.7.27Submit revised version, 2013.8.8 accepted;
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-25 01:52:00
IEEE Signal Processing Letters and IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing are recognized as the top journals in the field of signal processing, the review process is very rigorous, the reviewer level is veryHigh, review comments are often directly at stake.In addition, the journal has high requirements for innovation and writing!The general review is about 3 months, it is more difficult!
Show Review in Original Language
(23) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-08 15:01:00
Review is fast.I refused for a month and a half.The review comments of the three experts made me convinced that each comment was written in great detail.Said that my paper is not innovative.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-29 14:10:00
Review comments quickly replied, about two months, directly rejected, I feel that this article is very short, but it needs some beautiful deductions, it is the kind of short and fineType.Not very good.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-05 00:04:00
A total of 4 SPLs were selectd this year.Three of them were tragedy, and one was accepted after revision.Two of them are encrypted, one is for image quality evaluation, and one is for noise reduction.Only the piece of noise reduction is accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-04 16:04:00
was directly rejected, saying that English is not well written, does it also mean that innovation is not enough?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-19 16:09:00
The first time to select for SINGAL PROCESSING This society paper, selectd on September 12, AE awaiting decision for about two weeks, directly received on November 16.A review suggests receiving, a suggestion to reject, AE gives the chance luck better.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-30 00:28:00
2 reviewers, 3 months out of results, a minor repair, a rejection, the result refused
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-30 22:41:00
my one justReceive, editing is very efficient.The first round of review, 2 months, the first reviewer gave Xiao Xiu, the second draft, edited the manuscript.I carefully studied the second reviewer's opinion. I felt that he didn't understand the article at all and raised a lot of non-professional questions, so I should argue.So, I wrote a letter to the editor alone, and told him the actual situation. The editor agreed with me and let it re-enter as soon as possible.So I made a detailed explanation and reply to each of the comments of the second reviewer, resubmitted the manuscript, and received the acceptance notice two months later. I was very happy with my first IEEE paper.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-29 03:07:00
has a preliminary review for one and a half months, and three reviewers have given minor repairs. The conclusion of the deputy editor is also minor.Modify the re-attendance after one week.Received after another month.The review speed is fast, and it is more attractive to students who are eager to send paper.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-12 22:53:00
English, innovation and result requirements are quite high.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-03 09:42:00
is very efficient.It took less than 2 months from submission to giving a response, high innovation requirements, and good experimental results, otherwise it is easy to be despised.I selectd once, was rejected, and the English was too bad. Several reviewers asked the native speaker to help go through, modify and re-enter and receive.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-19 14:29:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=97
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING LETTERS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service