X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL]Hello, you are Visitor Number 95423 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleIEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
Journal Title AbbreviationsIEEE SENS J
ISSN1530-437X
h-index100
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
6.200.7491.659
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Instrumentation
Q19 / 129
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Q1104 / 670

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)16.20%
Official Websitehttp://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=7361
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/sensors
Open AccessNo
PublisherIEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC, 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855-4141
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyBimonthly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume1361
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1530-437X%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 6.3 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL: Write a review
Author: marshall121@163.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-14 10:25:00
This journal is actually very speedy.

(4) Thank | marshall121@163.com

Author: zarathustr


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-25 15:49:05
Submitted 14-Dec-2018Accepted 17-Feb-2019
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | zarathustr

Author: luobotoudaily


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-21 10:43:23
Regarding the GMR sensor, because the new insufficiency was rejected, the reviewers four, two directly refused, and two overhauls.The two feelings of rejection may be very big, and the criticism of the article is nothing, but their comments are too watery, and they are finished without a new meaning, which is useless for the promotion of the article.There is also a reviewer's opinion that there are quite a lot of opinions. It is a comparison of experts who are relatively amateurs. Some opinions are obviously wrong.There is also a major overhaul that the article is okay, but it needs a big change.After waiting for ten days, the editor directly refused.I feel that this journal generally refuses or minor repairs, and there is no overhaul around it.This journal has a huge amount of submissions!If you have obvious new ideas, you can select for this.good luck.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | luobotoudaily

Author: sjtu_yyzh


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-25 10:36:23
First trial for 1.5 months.Both reviewers gave their opinions very carefully and were very professional.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | sjtu_yyzh

Author: yxx


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-25 17:02:58
May 1A manuscript was submitted, a minor repair on September 17th, a good re-submitment on October 1st, and an acceptance on October 12.The review was a bit slow, and it was tweeted twice.The two reviewers gave an opinion and the general feeling was OK.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | yxx

Author: zarathustr


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-28 14:06:27
The journal has been reviewed ten times in the past six months, basically all Chinese articles.I have given the opportunity to change, but the other reviewers are very ruthless and directly smashed.I can see that the volume is large and there are more speculations.
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | zarathustr

Author: KB


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-23 07:23:35
When the manuscript was submitted in July, the manuscript volume was already more than 23,000. It was difficult to accept
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | KB

Author: tsf_83


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-08-18 12:48:41
Now the volume of this journal is huge, not so easy, 2018-3-19 submission, the status has been under review, the return result will become awaiting decision, 5-28 to reject, threeThe reviewer, two major overhauls, a minor repair, and finally gave a re-submitment. In June, the re-submitment will be re-allocated, the manuscript number will be redistributed, and the manuscript will be rejected again on August 12, and the reviewer will also change the manuscript number.Look, the manuscript volume has been too large in the past few months..................
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | tsf_83

Author: zjusjtu


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-04 10:08:29
21-Aug-2017 submitted31-Oct-2017 Reject (revise and resubmit)27-Nov-2017 revised and resubmitted27-Dec-2017 Minor Revision30-Dec-2017 revised and submitted30-Dec-2017 AcceptCompared to the TED review cycle, it is a bit longer, but it is better than TED.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | zjusjtu

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-28 20:20:35
12.271.20 Modify the comments back;2.23 Re-throwing (the winter vacation time is a long time);3.29 The second revision of the comments back;4.7 re-submitment4.9 Receiving4.10 accepted and the final version uploaded;4.18 proof verification and reply;4.19 publish online;No. 5.7 has been published (volume number is 6.1)6.1 or so was retrieved
Show Review in Original Language
(15) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 碧海


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-18 10:00:43
First trial for 4 months, 2 minor repairs, after uploading the revised draft, the editor will receive the results on the same day.For a total of four months, the speed is very fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 碧海

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-08 10:50:46
journal has a small overall difficulty. In the first issue, many articles have been published, and the content is relatively new, and the level is higher than that of general electronic sci journals.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-30 20:47:00
2012.3 month submitment, acceptd in 2013.2, changed some grammar mistakes, count it as minor repair.The issue of 2013.11 is posted online at the end of September 2013.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-05 23:51:00
Minor repair after 40 days of the first trial; submission of modifications after 20 days; acceptance after 10 days of the second trial.From submission to receipt of the acceptance notice, it has been Under review
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-04 20:35:00
first trial: 6 months, Reject (revise and resubmit), revised one and a half months second trial: 2 months, Minor Revision, repaired a WednesdayTrial: 1 month, Minor Revision, completed a month and four trials: half a month, accept.There are four reviewers, each of whom has a very sharp opinion.Every question must be answered very well, otherwise it will be revised.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-22 20:27:00
Is there a difference between this journal Under review and Under Review?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-21 07:39:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-14 08:52:00
This journal generally has 3 reviewers, and the review period is relatively long, generally ranging from 3-6 months, even minor repairs.I have to wait for about 3 months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-14 08:00:00
It seems that I can ask about the manuscript after three months. I have experience to say
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-10 11:44:00
8 more than 8 months, stillUnder Review.Should I withdraw the draft?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-25 20:55:00
6 months, still Under Review
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-08 14:32:00
is generally OK, if there are better experimental results.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-23 16:39:00
Actually there are 4 reviewers, and the reviewer's choice seems to be very casual~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-17 19:27:00
is generally speed, can't be generalized, some are long, and the accept is not high
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-17 15:26:00
The review speed is fast, and the indicators of the sensor are biased.The details of the indicators are very comprehensive.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service