Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | IEEE ELECTR DEVICE L | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0741-3106 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 135 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 12.90% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=55 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/edl | ||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC, 445 HOES LANE, PISCATAWAY, USA, NJ, 08855-4141 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Engineering | ||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Monthly | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1980 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 459 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0741-3106%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 1.3 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 25% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS: | Write a review |
Author: IEEE Member 那个人lei了 Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-03-03 11:13:39 Reviewers' opinions are very professionalsts, to systems, etc. The IEEE will organize standards for each field at regular intervals. The article has strict requirements on professional terms and expressions. ![]() ![]() |
Author: ahmdyosif_1991@hotmail.com Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2019-04-30 10:45:45 IEEE EDL is by far the best journal I have submitted my work to. The comments of the reviewers were on point and very informative and I was very satisfied with the editor's decisions. The review time was unbelievably fast. I highly recommend this journal! 24-March-2019 Submitted 10-Apr-2019 Major Revision 14-Apr-2019 Resubmitted 25-Apr-2019 Minor Revision 27-Apr-2019 Resubmitted 29-Apr-2019 Accept As Is ![]() ![]() |
Author: zjusjtu Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-05-04 10:00:50 11-Apr-2018 submitted23-Apr-2018 Minor Revision27-Apr-2018 revised and submitted01-May-2018 Minor Revision02-May-2018 revised and submitted02-May-2018 Accept As IsThe EDL review was very fast, from the first submission to the reception for only twenty days, and two minor repairs.This is my fourth SCI, and I can finally graduate. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Jia Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-04-02 09:41:52 the first scientific paper writing and submission, two major revision.It took a total of 6 months.The first four reviewers, finally gave reject ![]() ![]() |
Author: Jia Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-04-02 09:41:37 The first scientific paper writing and submission, two major revision.It took a total of 6 months.The first four reviewers, finally gave reject ![]() ![]() |
Author: zhangxizhen01@sina.com Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-09-06 19:17:48 IEEE EDL The first submission has been received.I was worried about it for the first time, but I was finally accepted, exchanged, and encouraged everyone to submit a manuscript.20160712 contributed, the editor said that no additional materials are allowed in the submission stage.A review comment will be given in about two weeks.The review comments are very good, and the opinions put forward by the two experts are very constructive.Edited to Major Revison.20160813 Reply to the reviewer's opinion and received it within about 1 week.Both reviewers agreed to accept, and believed that the scientific and technical issues were basically no problem, a little bit of advice, and that English needs to be changed.Edited to Minor Revison.20160827 again submitted the final version, received. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-08-30 21:25:44 Summary: EDL should be regarded as the best journal in the field of microelectronic devices, and it is harder to select than TED and APL. The mainland has published less on it. I heard that APL has only one reviewer.The luck has a big impact).Relatively speaking, the TED focuses on the comprehensive analysis of the system, EDL focuses on innovation, or the device performance has good experimental results, which can break through the existing level. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-06-18 13:16:00 experienced a major revison and a minor revision, which was accepted from March 12th to June 17th and lasted for 3 months.Things are new and will be better. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-05-13 15:37:00 experienced a major revison and a minor revision, accepted from March 20th to May 9th.Feeling a lot: 1. The submission system is very convenient to use; 2. The review speed is very fast, about under review time is 1 week, Awaiting ED preliminary decision is less than 2 weeks; 3. Reviewer review is very careful, opinion4. In the arrangement of the editor, select the experts in the field closest to the article content; 4. The system comes with Golden Reviewer for Authour selection, this ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-08-24 22:25:00 online submission URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/edl ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-08-19 09:33:00 Journal Homepage URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=55 ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-06-29 09:44:00 The influence is relatively large, and the review is quick. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-05-26 12:15:00 looks faster, but still has to prepare for it, from the first time to the final acceptance, the middle experienced a major overhaul, and then minor repairs, which lasted more than 4 months ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-05-08 11:03:00 Very good journal, good reputation, 09 engineering technology zone 2, the impact factor is not high, the submission process requirements are also many, especially literature citation and typesetting, but there are ready-made templates.In addition, the journal has higher requirements for innovation.The page fee is 110$/page, which is voluntary.The speed of submission is fast, and the reviewers are 2-3 people. If the manuscript is submitted, it will be sent to the review and review opinions, which will help the quality of the article.Overhaul situations sometimes lead to an additional reviewer, sometimes only the original reviewer comments.I feel that the reviewers have different personalities. After all, they are all obligated and difficult to see.In addition, when writing an article, try to quote more articles in your field, and often encounter reviewers who want to add articles. Recently, three of them have been lucky.Hope ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: 电子、光电子器件 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-11-30 11:34:00 experienced a major revision & resubmission, and the manuscript was accepted.Talk about some simple situations: 1. http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/edl The submission is best passed through its system 2. The review cycle is about 3 weeks, and soon 3. The impact factor is not very high, but the popularity should be veryGood: In 2003, the journals in this field ranked tenth (top10), and the Chinese Academy of Sciences divided them into SCI sub-category (Electrical and Electrical Engineering) Zone 1, Major Category (Engineering Technology) Zone 2. 4. Pay great attention to the novelty and importance of work 5Should be brave enough to high-level period ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: 电子及光电子器件性能理论设计及可靠性方面 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-08-13 15:26:00 in the field of electronic devices, influential journals, once selectd, sent directly to the editor, the feedback within one month, was rejected, ifThere is no very innovative thing, it is not easy to select in ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |