X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 60759 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleAGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsAGR FOREST METEOROL
ISSN0168-1923
h-index144
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.201.8361.783
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Agronomy and Crop Science
Q117 / 334
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Global and Planetary Change
Q113 / 83
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Atmospheric Science
Q113 / 115
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Forestry
Q13 / 140

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)12.10%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/503295/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/AGRFORMET
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaAgriculture and Forestry
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume378
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0168-1923%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 4.5 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 12.3 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 50%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 1.8 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY: Write a review
Author: 胡一菲


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-11-23 12:34:50
I have submitted two meteorological-related articles in two years, both of which were accepted after major revision and then minor revision. The first one: Initial date submitted: Oct 30 2018; Sep 11 2019, completed-accept. Five months after the submission of the first article, major revision was informed (two reviewers, one minor revision, one major revision). Three or four months after the review of the major revision, minor revision was informed (three reviewers in the third review, two minor revisions and one without any questions). It was accepted a month later. There were three reviewers who made many key suggestions. The article was revised greatly, and the method was changed as well. The second one: Initial date submitted: Mar 06 2019; Sep 15 2019, completed-accept. Three months after the submission of the second article, major revision was informed (two reviewers, one minor revision, one major revision). Two months after the review of major revision, minor revision was informed (two reviewers, two minor revisions). It was accepted a month later. There were three reviewers who made many key writing suggestions, which is helpful for improving the article. The two papers were published in the same issue of the same journal, with consecutive numbers. In short, the level of the reviewers is very high. The quality of the paper will be greatly improved after review.

(22) Thank | 胡一菲

Author: 至死不渝


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-07-03 22:02:18
Submitted on June 21, sent to the editor on June 22, and rejected on June 24. The opinions are as follows: and have decided that it is not suitable for our journal. Matching a paper to a journal is important because papers in the wrong journal will neither make the impact nor develop the science as they deserve to. I hope you agree that it is better to make a rapid editorial decision now, rather than delaying publication of your paper elsewhere by sending it out for a lengthy review.

(0) Thank | 至死不渝

Author: 天才少女


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-06-15 21:33:57
Submitted on May 17th, and then under review on May 19th. On June 15th, I was told that it was not suitable for their journal. Shame on you! Not suitable for you? What on earth was it under review! It took me a long time! “and have decided that it is not suitable for our journal. Matching a paper to a journal is important because papers in the wrong journal will neither make the impact nor develop the science as they deserve to. I hope you agree that it is better to make a rapid editorial decision now, rather than delaying publication of your paper elsewhere by sending it out for a lengthy review. Ying-Ping Wang, PhD Editor-in-Chief”

(3) Thank | 天才少女

Author: yzw子非鱼


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-27 18:06:13
My colleagues and I submitted a paper about the study of urban heat island effects. Specifically, how we can cool hot-humid (Asian) cities with urban trees. We submitted our manuscript in April this year, and I got the first review in September. It was recommended for major revision, and we made all the edits according to the reviewer’s comments. After we returned our revised draft to the reviewers, they said that we basically answered their doubts. Overall, one reviewer had significant opinions while the other two reviewers only pointed out some small things Our manuscript was finally accepted on November 20th.The reviewer's opinions were very pertinent. In general, this process was neither efficient or super slow. Because the journal is very influential, it’s worth it wait a little bit longer.

(0) Thank | yzw子非鱼

Author: 梦幻岛


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-01 09:59:29
2018.03.13Submission;2018.03.19 entered the external audit;2018.06.12 overhaul ended overhaul;Return after the modification of 2018.08.10;2018.09.12 notification accepted accepted;2018.09.19 online publishing online.The external review experts are very responsible and have a lot of constructive comments.It is not just an opinion, but an exchange.The last revised comments were 5,300 words, 16 pages.The originality of the work should have great advantages for the publication of the article.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 梦幻岛

Author: 科研民工


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-01 23:30:32
The top-level publication of the agricultural and forestry category is difficult to publish.Once the draft is rejected, it will not be accepted for re-review.However, the review and publication efficiency is extremely high. The articles submitted in the first half of 18 years are directly submitted to the three reviewers, and the review is completed in about 40 days. Minor Revision. After half a month of repair, the publication is accepted, and the direct online for half a month..An excellent publication in the field of forestry and ecology.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 科研民工

Author: EP


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-21 05:04:06
Vote for a 7-point journal.Both reviewers said: very important article, but not in line with this journal, go to AFM.Cast to AFM, twice. - Encourage re-attacks, then overhaul, then minor repairs, then receive.Toss more than a year.This process has about 5 reviewers involved.In fact, there is only one initial evaluation that is not positive (but it is also the person who reads the most carefully and gives the most earnest advice).It’s really a very serious journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | EP

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-07 12:59:00
Top journals in the field of agroecology, first-month 3 months overhaul, second-month 2 months overhaul, first trial after 1 month minor repair
Show Review in Original Language
(18) Thank | Anonymous

Author: ELES


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-07 12:30:08
Nonglin meteorological top publication, ranking first.The editorial requirements were very strict. Two minor revisions were made in the first instance, and the editor gave the overhaul.After the overhaul, the two reviewers agreed to publish and accept.The speed of review is ok.
Show Review in Original Language
(20) Thank | ELES

Author: 大懒猫


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-02 12:00:14
Top Journal of Agricultural Meteorology and Ecology ResearchVery good journal, the above article is very level.Directly acceptd 25 days after the overhaul.There is also an article in the external review to discuss the carbon flux and a climate change driving mechanism of agro-ecosystems.
Show Review in Original Language
(13) Thank | 大懒猫

Author: cau


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 11.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-02-09 11:30:29
The quality of the article is the key. The first trial took 11 months, and the review comments were very professional. After the big change was submitted, it was accepted directly for 20 days.
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | cau

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-22 10:04:00
was very quick in the first trial, and it took two months; because the reviewers had the same opinion, the second trial took three months.Estimated to be a pass, a rejection.The final editor is still very fair.The person who refused did not mention specific reasons at all.Refer to the comments of Review 2.Hired.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-19 10:20:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... ription#description
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-02-14 15:53:00
This journal has to say the direction, tooBig and small, from agriculture to forestry, but the core is meteorology, so overall it is more specialized.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-10-22 16:49:00
The first journal in the College of Forestry, the above article is really good.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service