My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service


   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title

Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[FUNGAL GENETICS AND BIOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 17161 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal Title AbbreviationsFUNGAL GENET BIOL
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Genetics
Q290 / 324
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Microbiology
Q238 / 147

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)9.90%
Official Websitehttp://www.journals.elsevier.com/fungal-genetics-and-biology/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/FGB
Open AccessNo
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1996
Annual Article Volume111
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1087-1845%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: Average 1.3 Month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 8.4 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 41.66%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 4.1 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【FUNGAL GENETICS AND BIOLOGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
  Reviews on FUNGAL GENETICS AND BIOLOGY: Write a review
Author: changwen2000@sina.com

Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision

Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-22 17:26:50
The speed of review is very fast. The first review, major revision, and I was given 90. I found a editing company to polish the language, revised the paper and submitted. Two weeks later, minor revision. I again revised, submitted one month later and it was accepted. In short, the journal has high standards for experimental data and research significance. The comments given by the reviewers are critical and suggested adding new experiments. I refused to do this and responded that the data in the paper are sufficient. The additional experiments should be the content of another article. This is a study of methodology, not the accumulation of experimental data. Sometimes we need to state our reasons, but when we need to be polite and provide the rationale. Journals usually like methodological papers because they may increase the citation rate of the journal. In the results of the first major revision, one reviewer is more affirmative about the article, saying that it is of great significance; the other criticized the article a lot, which made me feel depressed. When replying to the reviewer's comments, the reason should be clearly stated. Make you meaning clear, and the reply must not be rude. It takes a year from the beginning of writing to get this paper published, so start early. The revision and repeated modification of the language are very important, because it will be a pity if the paper I rejected because of the language.

(1) Thank | changwen2000@sina.com

Author: Anonymous

Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)

Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-11 11:22:00
Finally got 50 gold coins, huh, huh.My first article, written at the end of last year, was very poor and took a long time.The article was submitted in 6.12 this year, revised back to 7.18, and needs to be supplemented with experiments and language modifications.9.03 submitted after modification, 9.06 accepted, 9.18 online.I think the journal is still a good candidate for microbiology.If the amount of data in the experiment is large and the results are more rigorous and can explain the problem, even if the innovation is not enough, it is still possible to publish it.The journal is quick to review, and it's free, which is great.My tutor is directed at this point, let me select, huh, huh, I originally wanted to select for IF higher.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page

Start your review of [FUNGAL GENETICS AND BIOLOGY]:

Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service