X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 101728 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleEXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Journal Title AbbreviationsEXPERT SYST APPL
ISSN0957-4174
h-index162
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
11.001.4943.139
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Computer Science
Subcategory: Artificial Intelligence
Q116 / 202
Category: Computer Science
Subcategory: General Engineering
Q16 / 299
Category: Computer Science
Subcategory: Computer Science Applications
Q128 / 636

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)11.80%
Official Websitehttps://www.journals.elsevier.com/expert-systems-with-applications/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/ESWA
Open AccessNo
PublisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyBimonthly
Year Publication Started1990
Annual Article Volume710
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0957-4174%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 13.8 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 16%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-16 09:54:00
Because this journal is ranked Q2, countless people who want to advance their career submit their papers here. I see some people submit their PAKDD or APWEB papers and got accepted, so I took an article I published in ICDM and added new content before submitting here. It was rejected within a month! The second time I used an SIGIR article with some modification to submit.

(4) Thank | Anonymous

Author: dhyaniabhishek13@gmail.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 9.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-04-10 03:18:32
I submitted a manuscript in july18 and the first review came almost after 7 months. The review was useful and detailed and I went ahead to answer all the queries and made some changes. 2 months since then but no response has been communicated to me. So a total of 9 months but it still says "under review". It seems like a long time for minor revisions and gives a sense that the reviewers are  too busy to reply or the editor has forgotten about it. Not really a fast journal in my opinion.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | dhyaniabhishek13@gmail.com

Author: 有志者事竟成


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-01 16:26:30
Upstairs should be NUDT University, very weighty, I have to read it well, study well
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 有志者事竟成

Author: 风雪星月夜


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-29 08:40:06
2018.12.6 Submission, 2019.1.29 acceptd, the results of the first trial in the middle of a month, modified 10 days ~ ~ the whole less than two months ~ ~ so fast, it should be only an example,For reference ~~
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 风雪星月夜

Author: jdh


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-18 10:18:09
My first sci, after I had a master's degree, I had the idea of ​​going abroad to read Bo, so I worked hard in the first year, and finally got a good quality journal one year later.Should be able to add weight to the application phd.The process of this article is very rough. The first version selectd for the IEEE TBME. It was rejected on the third day of the select, so I rethink some of the more novel methods.The second edition selectd for IEEE's JBHI. This time, it was better. After returning to the overhaul in two months, I received a total of five reviewers' comments, and the second trial was still rejected.However, after the revision and reply of the past six months, the quality of the article has been greatly improved.So I changed the switch to ESWA again. This time it went a lot. The processing speed of ESWA is also amazingly fast. I don't know if I am lucky.2018.9.3 Submission2018.10.12 Return to the first-instance opinion, a total of three reviewers (one of them and their shameless, asked me to quote him a lot of watering articles)2018.11.10 Submit the revised version again2018.12.3 Returning to the second-instance opinion, only the opinions of the two reviewers were returned this time (it is estimated that the editor of the shameless reviewer could not stand it, so he was not sent to him)2018.12.6 Submit again2018.12.16 Notification acceptOverall, the process of submiting in ESWA is still relatively smooth. I have been very grateful for the three months from the initial submitment to the recruitment.
Show Review in Original Language
(14) Thank | jdh

Author: 1397468184@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-16 20:38:59
Hope to be one of the articles, I hope more exchanges, thank you, thank you very much for providingValuable advice.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 1397468184@qq.com

Author: 仗剑走天涯


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-08 02:34:25
The difficulty of these two years has increased significantly, and I feel that I attach great importance to the solution method.Medium difficulty in the second districtThere were two people in the lab this year. One person was rejected in the first instance, and a lot of opinions were put forward. It just happened to poke the weakness of the article; the other two were revised and acceptd, and a lot of experiments were done during the period.Recently selectd for an article, has been ranked to six or seven thousand, I hope that I am lucky.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 仗剑走天涯

Author: code_maker


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-24 16:27:18
Recently acceptd an article, after two revisions.It may be that the journal belongs to the computer category (a journal recognized by the CCF Computer Association), with particular emphasis on the analysis of algorithm performance and algorithm comparison.So a lot of experimental and performance analysis was added to the revision.In addition, the preliminary examination of this journal has higher requirements on the submission format, and it is likely to be called back if it does not meet the format requirements.In general, the journals are not bad. You can check that Peking University’s Tsinghua University’s Zhejiang University has published articles on it this year.
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | code_maker

Author: CMC


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-20 19:23:15
The first month of the first trial results revise a total of 12 comments, a month to modify and then select.In the third month, the second trial results revise a total of 2 comments, all of which were not modified in the first-instance opinion. They were re-submited after one month's revision, and the second day after the submitment, from the time of submitteding to the recruitment for four months.In general, there are still a lot of experimental supplements.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | CMC

Author: tod


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-08 00:31:38
Three times and five times were invited to review the manuscript, directly ignore
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | tod

Author: 707145297@qq.com


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-11 15:59:27
Overall, it is relatively smooth, exchange group 725554986, discuss and share the submission experience and problems.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 707145297@qq.com

Author: gdsyt


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-29 19:58:42
Overall speaking a good journal, the processing speed is faster, it can be externally audited in a week or so, and the comments are received in more than one month. The result is also very fast after the revision.The level of the reviewer can be, the editor-in-chief is strict, and the person who does not enter the editorial when submitting the manuscript will be immediately quit, and the chance of being able to make an external audit is relatively large.Although the IF has dropped a little this year, the overall level is still in the middle of the 2nd district. The TOP is a bit reluctant. If you speak the TOP according to the small subject, it is still quite good.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | gdsyt

Author: 李小平


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-21 11:46:30
letPub wrote it yourself, Top Journal: Yes, review journal: No.Have you said so bad?I said that I dare not contribute?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 李小平

Author: ORer


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-30 00:13:36
The review of the journal is quite strict, the opinions of the experts are relatively fair, and the level of publication is not bad.If you give a retreat, you need to take seriously
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | ORer

Author: Sunny


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-17 16:28:43
This journal is the top journal in the field. The experts' review opinions are very professional, the requirements for the paper are also very strict, and the impact factors increase year by year.As long as you write carefully, there are certain innovations, and the opportunities are still relatively large.I found that many of them were deliberately discredited after the rejection.This journal is still good.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Sunny

Author: ffjin


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-20 17:46:01
was played by the famous bellsouth professor. This LLM played
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | ffjin

Author: Forrest


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-18 10:11:43
The posting link of the webpage is wrong. This is the posting link of AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION.Speaking out, I am not afraid of your jokes. I submitted an article to ESA to the AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION. The editor sent me a message and I reacted. So!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Forrest

Author: dwh


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-26 11:17:20
Taiwan relations household manipulation, reputation is not very good, cautious
Show Review in Original Language
(27) Thank | dwh

Author: dfds


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-04 11:38:08
a bit of slag ~~~ quoting your own paper, relationship household, 唉, play bad
Show Review in Original Language
(17) Thank | dfds

Author: 小清新Dr.Yao


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-07-14 14:02:43
2014 December 16 select.January 1, 2016 notice to modify the writing of Introduction, Related Work, Conclusion, etc., requesting a month to return.On February 24, 2016, the notice revised the request to resolve a bigger affirmation in the text, requesting a month to return.On April 15, 2016, the notice was accepted.The first trial was slow, but looking at the latest acceptd articles seems to be a lot faster.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 小清新Dr.Yao

Author: Blessedman


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-11-27 11:22:46
sad reminder, the latest Chinese Academy of Sciences SCI partition in the journal fell from the second district to the third district.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Blessedman

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-24 10:10:00
Submission 4 and a half monthsAfter giving the review comments, two reviewers, Xiao Xiu.The review comments mainly require the revision of the introduction and the containment section, and no reference to the journal article is required.However, in the time of revision, in order to be on the safe side, I actively quoted the journal's literature.On the day of the repair, I will reply to accept
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-13 09:29:00
. Children don’t select for this journal. It’s too pitted. Just look at the citations, there are wood, grass
Show Review in Original Language
(20) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-22 15:59:00
2013.1.12Submit;2013.7.16 accept; Yes, there is no intermediate link, the comments from the two reviewers are directly acceptd, without any comments, without any modifications.This journal is becoming more and more interesting.My qq: 360715119, often communicate.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-07 13:14:00
I submitted the manuscript on April 13th, under review on April 17th, and returned the review on June 4th. The two reviews, the first review has 14 comments, but basicallyThe opinions of introduction and related work have only one opinion in the second review, and the evaluation is good. After the revision, I re-submitted the revised manuscript on July 4, and notified me that the paper was accepted at 10 o'clock in the evening.The period is less than three months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service