EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY

An article of mine has just got accepted recently, and the specific process is as follows: Submitted on December 22, 2019, and major revision made on February 8, 2020. One reviewer gave a lot of comments, another one basically had no comment. Revision submitted on February 12, 2020. Accepted on February 15, 2020. I don’t know when it will be published. Is there anyone knows?

(4) Thank | 千与千寻123

December 2018, submission; February 2019, first review comments---major revisions required. (Under review 2 times during this period. We didn’t know if the reviewer were changes.) April 2019, revision submitted. (It took 2 months to make a lot of revisions.) May 2019, second review comments---minor revisions required. May 2019, accepted. The overall speed is still very fast.

(2) Thank | 玩的就是蛋

This journal is legendary, but my first review length was three and a half months, and the total to acceptance is 7 months. It doesn't feel very fast.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Article content and journal range not convinced

(3) Thank | @@

The article is not suitable for the journal, change the select, hehe.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Hello everyone, who can help to provide the format requirements of the journal?Thank you, thank you!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Invested an article, the number has reached more than 1,300, it can be seen that the journal has a very large amount of manuscripts, but the amount of publication is limited, so I feel that the rejection isThe probability is still high!One week was rejected by the editor for the following reasons: Unfortunately, your manuscript is only descriptive and does not seem to present state-of-the-art food research of more general and international interest., I have to regre

(0) Thank | Anonymous

My direction is the separation and purification of traditional Chinese medicine polysaccharides and structural analysis. Because the article is not innovative, I did not expect to select for this journal.The format of the article is easy to solve, and the journal's review is very fast, and the notice is revised within 2 weeks.2 people reviewing the manuscript, the revised opinions are very detailed, one question is very professional, and the other one is the student review, all of which are comments on grammar and punctuation.After the revision, the editing work is very efficient.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Magazine is not too fast, two and a half months in the first trial, minor repair.This cycle has been very fast in the food journal. The small repairs were received within three days after returning. The middle also included a weekend. In general, the journal is not difficult to select. You can select for it and try it out..

(0) Thank | Anonymous

7There is no review by the editor and will be sent to the trial.2 - 3 months review time.Minor repair, 15 days later, and received the next day.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The journal URL should be this http://www.springer.com/food+science/journal/217

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Three and a half months in the first trial, then refused to re-submit the manuscript, and then gave a major repair, just rehabilitated, praying will have good results!Pointing at it and graduating!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

just waited for 3 months, and there was a Christmas in the middle. Then the reply given in January was Xiao Xiu, and it was recorded after the repair.quite fast.Some articles are still innovative.It is faster in the impact factor of 1 point.My first SCI!Still a little excited!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is very fast, first waited for a month and a half after reviewing the awaiting decision and then under review. It is estimated that the editor and reviewer can discuss whether it can be acceptd during this period, then it is anotherMonth and then let me minor repair, I accepted it within a week after the revision, really very fast

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I have been UNDRER review for 7 weeks, how long do you say the message?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Holiday holiday, selectd for half a month or submitted to journal.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

can select, the journal review speed is very fast

(0) Thank | Anonymous

can select

(0) Thank | Anonymous

review speed is fast, innovative in general.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The emulsion is not innovative, but the workload is relatively large. The journal has been highly efficient and has been revised for more than a month.After a small repair, I received it.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

has been more than three months!Still under review!!Who is the same situation as me?

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Submitted an article about 5 months, it seems that after two rounds of review, now the state is waiting for the editor to decide.This state occurred once two months ago.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal has always been very fast. If it is not suitable, it may be rejected in 2 days.Review draft for 1-3 months.But this time it has been 10 days since it was submitted, no one has dealt with it.Want to withdraw, tangled in

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal Homepage URL: http://www.springerlink.com/content/100491/

(0) Thank | Anonymous