X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 33272 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleEUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsEUR FOOD RES TECHNOL
ISSN1438-2377
E-ISSN1438-2385
h-index89
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
3.800.6540.976
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Food Science
Q172 / 299
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
Q177 / 340
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Biochemistry
Q3226 / 407
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: Biotechnology
Q2107 / 275
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: General Chemistry
Q2119 / 398

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)7.50%
Official Websitehttps://www.springer.com/journal/217
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/efrt
Open AccessNo
PublisherSPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10013
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationGERMANY
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1898
Annual Article Volume238
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1438-2377%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: About 58.33%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY: Write a review
Author: 千与千寻123


Subject Area: Agriculture Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2020-02-18 14:59:12
An article of mine has just got accepted recently, and the specific process is as follows: Submitted on December 22, 2019, and major revision made on February 8, 2020. One reviewer gave a lot of comments, another one basically had no comment. Revision submitted on February 12, 2020. Accepted on February 15, 2020. I don’t know when it will be published. Is there anyone knows?

(4) Thank | 千与千寻123

Author: 玩的就是蛋


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-05-27 09:20:25
December 2018, submission; February 2019, first review comments---major revisions required. (Under review 2 times during this period. We didn’t know if the reviewer were changes.) April 2019, revision submitted. (It took 2 months to make a lot of revisions.) May 2019, second review comments---minor revisions required. May 2019, accepted. The overall speed is still very fast.

(2) Thank | 玩的就是蛋

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-09 19:59:00
This journal is legendary, but my first review length was three and a half months, and the total to acceptance is 7 months. It doesn't feel very fast.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: @@


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-11 15:58:48
Article content and journal range not convinced
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | @@

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-09-14 10:07:08
The article is not suitable for the journal, change the select, hehe.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-13 10:05:00
Hello everyone, who can help to provide the format requirements of the journal?Thank you, thank you!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-17 14:28:00
Invested an article, the number has reached more than 1,300, it can be seen that the journal has a very large amount of manuscripts, but the amount of publication is limited, so I feel that the rejection isThe probability is still high!One week was rejected by the editor for the following reasons: Unfortunately, your manuscript is only descriptive and does not seem to present state-of-the-art food research of more general and international interest., I have to regre
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-13 11:43:00
My direction is the separation and purification of traditional Chinese medicine polysaccharides and structural analysis. Because the article is not innovative, I did not expect to select for this journal.The format of the article is easy to solve, and the journal's review is very fast, and the notice is revised within 2 weeks.2 people reviewing the manuscript, the revised opinions are very detailed, one question is very professional, and the other one is the student review, all of which are comments on grammar and punctuation.After the revision, the editing work is very efficient.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-27 17:08:00
Magazine is not too fast, two and a half months in the first trial, minor repair.This cycle has been very fast in the food journal. The small repairs were received within three days after returning. The middle also included a weekend. In general, the journal is not difficult to select. You can select for it and try it out..
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-04 10:10:00
7There is no review by the editor and will be sent to the trial.2 - 3 months review time.Minor repair, 15 days later, and received the next day.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-30 17:32:00
The journal URL should be this http://www.springer.com/food+science/journal/217
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-12 18:35:00
Three and a half months in the first trial, then refused to re-submit the manuscript, and then gave a major repair, just rehabilitated, praying will have good results!Pointing at it and graduating!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-10 19:32:00
just waited for 3 months, and there was a Christmas in the middle. Then the reply given in January was Xiao Xiu, and it was recorded after the repair.quite fast.Some articles are still innovative.It is faster in the impact factor of 1 point.My first SCI!Still a little excited!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-19 10:47:00
is very fast, first waited for a month and a half after reviewing the awaiting decision and then under review. It is estimated that the editor and reviewer can discuss whether it can be acceptd during this period, then it is anotherMonth and then let me minor repair, I accepted it within a week after the revision, really very fast
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-17 09:33:00
I have been UNDRER review for 7 weeks, how long do you say the message?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-16 08:37:00
Holiday holiday, selectd for half a month or submitted to journal.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-15 09:31:00
can select, the journal review speed is very fast
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-06 09:48:00
can select
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-28 17:01:00
review speed is fast, innovative in general.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-09 10:35:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-01 19:21:00
The emulsion is not innovative, but the workload is relatively large. The journal has been highly efficient and has been revised for more than a month.After a small repair, I received it.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-08 15:01:00
has been more than three months!Still under review!!Who is the same situation as me?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-16 08:37:00
Submitted an article about 5 months, it seems that after two rounds of review, now the state is waiting for the editor to decide.This state occurred once two months ago.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-21 22:58:00
This journal has always been very fast. If it is not suitable, it may be rejected in 2 days.Review draft for 1-3 months.But this time it has been 10 days since it was submitted, no one has dealt with it.Want to withdraw, tangled in
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-21 09:20:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://www.springerlink.com/content/100491/
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service