X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

EPL

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Understanding Research Metrics: What Really Matters?

[EPL]Hello, you are Visitor Number 54691 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleEPL
Journal Title AbbreviationsEPL-EUROPHYS LETT
ISSN0295-5075
E-ISSN1286-4854
h-index144
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
3.600.7540.746
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: General Physics and Astronomy
Q271 / 224

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)5.40%
Official Websitehttp://epljournal.edpsciences.org/
Online Manuscript Submission
Open AccessNo
PublisherEPL ASSOCIATION, EUROPEAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 6 RUE DES FRERES LUMIERE, MULHOUSE, FRANCE, 68200
Subject AreaPhysics
Country/Area of PublicationFRANCE
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1986
Annual Article Volume359
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0295-5075%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.9 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 85%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【EPL】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on EPL: Write a review
Author: 火光


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-04-17 13:09:32
26 Feb 2019 Manuscript sent to Referee; 01 Mar 2019 Referee could not report; 05 Mar 2019 Reminded Referee; 05 Mar 2019 Referee promised a review; 01 Apr 2019 Reminded Referee who promised; 08 Apr 2019 Reminded Referee who promised; 08 Apr 2019 Referee promised a review; 12 Apr 2019 Referee sent a report; 16 Apr 2019 Message to author asking for revision.

(2) Thank | 火光

Author: zhujiakun@hust.edu.cn


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-18 12:27:38
Three reviewers. Still waiting.

(0) Thank | zhujiakun@hust.edu.cn

Author: adda


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-26 10:48:48
It is highly recommended not to choose China Co-editor, my first foreign Co-editor, the second Co-editor will be replaced the next day, but this Chinese Co-The editor has not been processed for ten days, and he chose to shoot his head at that time, regret it
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | adda

Author: zhujiakun@hust.edu.cn


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-18 12:38:46
2017-10-06[10] file sent to printer2017-10-05[20] pdf offprint sent to author2017-10-05[31] online first ready for publication2017-10-05[25] paper ready2017-10-05[38] internal editing phase 32017-10-02[38] internal editing phase 32017-09-26[33] started internal editing phase 22017-09-21[09] proofs back from author2017-09-21[08]proofs received by author2017-09-20[34] sent notice of ready proofs
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | zhujiakun@hust.edu.cn

Author: zhujiakun@hust.edu.cn


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-18 12:33:38
European service is a bit stiff. When submitting a manuscript, go to the official website for a template. It is quite troublesome to change. It is also very troublesome when proofing, or it is very original proof..The speed of review is very fast. It mainly depends on whether you can find a suitable reviewer. The level of manuscript is general, the direction is too complicated, and the situation is uneven. There are both high-level articles and big love articles of Audrey. There are APL on the PLA.CPL,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | zhujiakun@hust.edu.cn

Author: zhujiakun@hust.edu.cn


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-18 12:28:07
31 Jul 2017 Reminded Referee307 Aug 2017 Referee3 sent a report08 Aug 2017 Message to author asking for revision18 Aug 2017 The revised manuscript arrived to the Editorial Office18 Aug 2017 Revised ms was sent to the Co-editor29 Aug 2017 Manuscript Accepted30 Aug 2017 Copyright Form received
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | zhujiakun@hust.edu.cn

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-31 09:57:26
This journal is really awesome, the first paper received it, the only bad thing is that the journal's influence factor is a bit low, 1.957.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: epl


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-06 13:36:42
The optical editor of this journal is very small, and he selectd for one. He was refused to say the same day, and he also blocked the manuscript of the manuscript.It is because of implicit criticism of his academic views.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | epl

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-22 22:46:25
There was an article on January 3, 2016, and I hope to be able to submit it for review...On January 7th, co-editor is Christian Beck, asking for a big trial.On January 31st, it was rejected, one was revised, and one said no new ideas!On February 1st, the editor replied and agreed to re-submit the revised draft and return to the two reviewers.On February 23rd, the reissue was revised...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-19 10:32:00
EPL, which was selectd in early August, the editor found two reviewers.The reviewers' opinions were more positive and several suggestions for revision were made.After the revision, the reviewer second trial and finally received.What I am doing is the direction of photoelectric detection.EPL is also interested in papers on engineering direction.06 Aug 2013 Manuscript received by Editorial Office06 Aug 2013 Manuscript sent to Co-editor19 Aug 2013 Manuscript sent to Referee119 Aug 2013
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-14 16:24:00
What is the situation?When will there be results?Looking forward to...20 Aug 2013 Manuscript received by Editorial Office20 Aug 2013 Manuscript sent to Co-editor26 Aug 2013 Manuscript sent to Referee126 Aug 2013 Manuscript sent to Referee226 Aug 2013 Referee1 promised ar
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-20 16:55:00
is really fast, usually a reviewer.But it seems that the big class fell to the 3rd district http://if.easysci.com/2012/bigclass/wuli.html
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-11 15:14:00
has been almost two months, it is really anxious.Although there is a Christmas, but it is really so slow
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-01 08:08:00
I didn’t know the journal before, I just received the review request from the journal, so let’s take a look at the evaluation of it.The quality is ok, ready to review the draft by apl standard
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-21 19:42:00
submitted the results in less than 2 weeks, the speed is very fast.But at the time it was said that it could not be received because there was a reviewer who did not support the comments.We quickly added the data requested by the reviewer and resubmitted it to the editor, which is equivalent to the argue, and then received it less than 2 weeks later.Overall, I feel good about EPL journal, but this year's impact factor has dropped to 2.2, and it is still 2.7 when submiting. The main reason is that EPL journal is not very clear, it seems that there is no special feature.It is recommended to submit in a professional or a more well-known journal such as APL PRB.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-19 21:03:00
IF Total number of citations 5 years average IF 2011 2.171 17415 2.119IF Total number of citations (2010) 2.753 16962(2009)2.893 16820(2008)2.203 14421
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-29 15:35:00
good journal, the editor is very responsible, will help you to review the reviewer's comments.The reviewers were also very responsible, picking out all the problems in my article from beginning to end, and gave 8 review comments, let me quote some classic documents.The general feeling is that Europeans do things in detail.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-20 11:01:00
The review is relatively fast, and it will be 3 months from the time of posting to the publication, and it has been a good one before!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-19 14:49:00
Submitted for half a year, received after minor repairs.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-04 21:28:00
is very lucky. After the article is revised, it will be accepted directly.The overall feeling is good, especially the speed.It has now been published.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-29 22:57:00
There were many technical problems encountered during the review process, and the reviewer's opinion time difference was too large. From the submission in early August to today's acceptance, there were 4 months and a long wait.But in the end it was accepted.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-21 20:58:00
has sent an EPL article some time ago. I just received a reviewer yesterday. Is this journal a reviewer?The process is as follows: 11 Jul 2011 Manuscript received by Editorial Office 11 Jul 2011 Manuscript sent to Co-editor 04 Aug 2011 Manuscript sent to Referee1 08 Aug 2011 Referee1 could not report 09 Aug 201
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-22 12:42:00
Journal Homepage URL:Http://epljournal.edpsciences.org/
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-11 23:20:00
It is said that this journal has been reviewed and published very quickly (within two months), and this is submitted, hoping to produce results within one month.Looking forward to...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-06-14 20:50:00
is easier. I have submited 2 in a division, and it is easier than PRB, OL, OE, etc.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [EPL]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service