ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY

2019.12.06, submission; 2020.01.18, revision comments were received, and major revision was required (2 reviewers, the first one raised 2 comments, the second one raised 28 comments); 2020.03.02, the article was submitted after revision (it was delayed during the period, the second was too careful and too responsible to point out the punctuation of the references); 2020.03.07, accept. P.S.: Overall, the work is meticulous, and the requirements for innovation is not high. Be careful when replying to reviewers' comments, and the articles would not be difficult to be accepted. Finally: I wish the journal gets better and better!!!

(4) Thank | 康师傅脑残酸菜面

2018-12-14, submission; 2019-01-24, review comments returned (minor revision); 2019-02-21, first revised manuscript submission; 2019-03-27, review comments (major revision); 2019-04-03, second revised manuscript submission; 2019-05-22, review comments returned (minor revision); 2019-05-26, third revised manuscript submission and no review comments haven’t been given still now.

(5) Thank | Terminal

1 month review. 5 reviewers. Used an editing service to avoid language and formatting issues. This journal prioritizes practical applications.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Very good journal, editor and reviewer is still very responsible, replying to minor repairs after more than one month, directly accepted the next day after the revision, the speed is very fast, optimistic about this journal.

(3) Thank | F243

This journal is a journal with a relatively high impact factor in the district. It will return the review comments within two months. The editors and reviewers have strict control, basically 3-4Reviewer, is a very good journal.

(2) Thank | ssscci

Good journal, from submission to recruitment for 5 and a half months, editors and reviewers are strict!

(3) Thank | niming

has submited in a desulfurization article, the first trial for two months, the reviewer is very professionalThe question raised is very much at the point.The attitude is also very mild.

(2) Thank | yushulinfeng

submitted an article about desulfurization and denitrification,Casted on October 20, 2014,Reworked around February 15, 2015, first trial for 4 months;Returned on March 20, 2015,Yesterday, I said that there was no news. I was notified to accept this morning. It was a smooth one, but it took a long time.

(0) Thank | andyyiyin

has submitted an article about desulfurization and denitrification.Casted on October 20, 2014,Reworked around February 15, 2015, first trial for 4 months;Returned on March 20, 2015,One month after the repair, there is no news until now

(2) Thank | andyyiyin

submitted an article about desulfurization and denitrification,Casted on October 20, 2014,Reworked around February 15, 2015, first trial for 4 months;Returned on March 20, 2015,One month after the repair, there is no news yet

(1) Thank | andyyiyin

Very responsible journal, sent twice in the external trial, acceptd after minor repairs, online publication 10 days later

(1) Thank | wu41831@163.com

03-Mar-2013 Submission 02-Jun-2013 return opinion, overhaul 17-Jul-2013 revised manuscript submission 14-Oct-2013 before and after the recruitment of more than 7 months, very tiring

(0) Thank | Anonymous

18-Jul-2013 Submit

(0) Thank | Anonymous

02-Jun-2013 Submission 29-Jul-2013 Overhaul 13-Aug-2013 Reworked 14-Oct-2013 Received fromAfter submitting the manuscript to receive a total of 4 months of overhaul, the editor will find the reviewer and review it for a while, no matter how hard it is!Serious treatment will have good results

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2013-5-1Submissions enter under review status; 2013-7-29 overhaul; 2013-8-12 overhaul return; 2013-8-14 receive

(1) Thank | Anonymous

4 After submitting the manuscript on the 17th, directly under review, waited for more than three months, urging once, giving some suggestions, being rejected, feeling that the reviewer's opinion has long been returned, the editor is a little irresponsible, personal opinion, still very good journal

(0) Thank | Anonymous

24. Dec, 2012 submitted19. May, 2013 major revision04. Jul, 2013 minor revision08. Jul, 2013 accepted lasted 6 and a half months, 3 months laterE-mail reminder once, personal guess may be the reviewer in the middle, and finally there is only one reviewer, the editing efficiency is very high.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The insect friends who selectd, I selectd for ET for 5 months, still under review, do you want to draft?

(2) Thank | Anonymous

I wonder if anyone knows how often it is necessary to enter the SCI database after the journal is accepted.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

just one, the editor's request is very strict, 2 reviewers, a major repair, a minor repair, about 3 months to accept.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Do you have to use the email address of the correspondent author for registration?

(1) Thank | Anonymous

After the overhaul, 5 months, gave 5 minor repairs!Accepted after a week of minor repair!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Now ET has a new supplement, called Environmental Technology Reviews, and it is possible that the review of ET will be returned to this journal.One issue per year.But now the journal seems to be unable to be retrieved by the web.

(2) Thank | Anonymous