ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH

2019-1-14 Submitted to journal; 2019-1-16 With editor; 2019-1-25 Under review; 2019-2-10 Required reviews completed; 2019-2-15 Major revision; 2019-3-4 Revision submitted to journal; 2019-3-5 Under review; 2019-3-24 Required reviews completed; 2019-3-26 Accepted. I read other people’s submission time everywhere before acceptance, and now I share my own. I think it depends on luck. The speed of mine can be regarded as very fast. It can be seen that the reviewers dealt with it very quickly. There were 500 comments of major revision. It was a bit unexpected to be accepted without minor revision. The reviewers said the changes were made thoroughly and accurately.

(4) Thank | 红心火龙果

The initial screening was more about reference formatting. After passing that, I got minor revision. My paper was finally accepted last December. My research is about environmental pollution (heavy metals) and technology of reusing solid waste.

(7) Thank | newsfromidea@126.com

18-09-02, submitted to journal18-10-01, under review19-01-03, major revision (five reviewers)19-01-12,authored submitted to journal19-02-07, major revision (four reviewers)19-02-10,authored submitted to journal19-02-19, acceptIn the early stage, it was pressed by the editor for one month before being sent to the trial. Then, in the first round of review, only one person agreed to review the manuscript, and then the reviewer was recommended, and the review process was completed.Five review comments are really not hurt.The final result is good~

(0) Thank | wujiemc

After the submission, the under review has changed 5 times, indicating that there are 5 reviewers.This review request is too high, and is ready to be rejected....

(0) Thank | wwwww65

Jan. 30 submittedFeb. 5 with editorFeb. 7 editor invited with editor...

(0) Thank | 行万里

18-09-02, submitted to journal18-09-05, with editor18-10-01, under review (during five time periods, all under review)18-12-18, required reviews completed18-12-19, required reviews completed19-01-03, major revision (five reviewers)19-01-12,authored submitted to journal19-01-14, under review

(2) Thank | wujiemc

11.13 selectd, it is now 7 and a half weeks, still under review, heart tired.

(0) Thank | chuan1067110737@163.com

2018-11-15submitted2018-11-20with editor2018-11-28under review2018-12-15revise2018-12-23submitted2018-12-27with editor, under review2018-12-30acceptIt is the fastest speed I have learned. If the teacher didn't inform me of the review comments, I didn't plan to check it out because it was too slow. I hope that there will be no bad changes after the expansion.Only one reviewer, who made a few small comments, quickly repaired it, added an experiment and added the previous data, and quickly received it.Just the second paper is also being revised. This one can still have the first reference. I am very happy. I have a good start in 2019.

(12) Thank | joey你个大头

2018-7-11 Submitted to Journal2018-7-17 With Editor2018-7-19 With Editor2018-7-30 Under Review2018-11-8 Under Review2018-11-9 Required Reviews Completed2018-11-22 Required Reviews Completed2018-11-26 Required Reviews Completed;Major Revision2018-12-14 Revision Submitted to Journal2018-12-17 Editor Invited2018-12-18 With Editor, Under Review2018-12-24 Accept4 reviewers ~ changed tired, but the final result is good!Tired and happy!

(4) Thank | Bigstar

2018, the number of the 6.17 select has not come back to the first trial....... I rushed 2 times in the middle, 1 time is two reviewersPeople refused to review the manuscript, and they became patience for the second time. They really couldn’t afford it. Is it necessary to prepare for the manuscript???

(2) Thank | 燕子666

10 Aug 2018 submitted09 Oct 2018 major revise06 Nov 2018 proposal submitted02 Dec 2018 acceptThe time is moderate, not too fast, the reviewer 1 gave a major repair, the reviewer 2 gave the rejection, the editor gave the opportunity for the overhaul, and thanked the brother for the help in the revision. The editor was Philippe Garrigues, who was very nice.

(1) Thank | 一生伏首拜阳明

9.14 submitted to journal9.18 with editor9.24 under review10.15 aqiured review compeleted10.25 revise10.30 submitted to journal10.31 under review11.4 accpet

(5) Thank | 勿恶小

Speed ​​is OK, not fast or slow.Learning metal materials, suddenly a little interested in air pollution, chose a less than 3 points to try.20180726 Submitted20180727 with editor20180816 under review20180919 minor revision20180925 submitted to the journal20181013 accept

(7) Thank | cangture

Submitted in November 2017Return of overhaul opinion in early June 2018Submitted after the overhaul at the end of June 2018Received in July 2018, 20 days after online

(4) Thank | 女王远远

Rejected is always notified soon, the instructor told me that I was rejected for three months, actuallyThe time of rejection should be very early (I can especially drag it)The reason for rejecting the manuscript is that it is hopeless, the research is superficial, the experimental design is all wrong, the analysis is not logical, and so on...Later, I proposed more than 2,000 words of revision. I was really responsible. I was very meticulous. After I changed it all, it was equivalent to rewriting the paper.... The first submission, I still benefited.Shallow, but I will continue to work hard on a journal...

(9) Thank | 板栗

is slow, accept directly!

(3) Thank | 阿三

The direction of sludge dewatering, the first rejection of the draft, lasted for one month, revised and resubmitted one month after returning the manuscript, directly after the minor repair, lasted for three months.

(1) Thank | 1547390261@qq.com

Submitted on November 29, 2017, June 2018The review comments on the 6th will be returned, and after the return on June 16th, the 26th will be accepted.It took a total of 8 months.

(2) Thank | 女王远

15 Jun 2018 submited to journal19 Jun 2018 with editor22 Jun 2018 editor invitedWait patiently...

(0) Thank | cxw

contributed on March 13, 2018March 31 external reviewOverhaul on April 16Return on May 7Received on June 11The journal is very fast and the editor is very responsible!

(3) Thank | changda

18 The manuscript at the end of February, April 17th overhaul, 5Retired on the 16th of the month has been an under review, and I want to try the manuscript

(1) Thank | ll

review 4Month, I always wanted to send a reminder letter to the editorial department, but I couldn't find the mailbox. I couldn't withdraw the manuscript after rushing to graduate.

(1) Thank | sa

Submitted at the end of November last year, received at the end of April this year, a major overhaul in February, due to the 2 year reworked after the Chinese New Year, and a major overhaul in April, after the repair.

(2) Thank | Kerwin

After many days of with editor. Finally, from the editorial part to the editor, the result was tragedy.Said to be inconsistent with the theme.Edit Gangrong Shi

(0) Thank | Lala

An article on wastewater treatment has been submitted for 6 months, and it has been urging twice in the middle. It is to wait patiently, without words

(1) Thank | yangpeizhen1028@126.com